SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

SentinelOne and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. SentinelOne is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.9, while Seqrite is ranked #44. SentinelOne holds a 4.4% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of SentinelOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Seqrite Endpoint Security are prominent players in the realm of endpoint security solutions. Based on a comprehensive feature set and effective automation, SentinelOne appears to have an advantage, especially for enterprises that prioritize centralized management and automation.

Features: SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers centralized endpoint management through a real-time console, enhancing visibility and reporting with AI-powered behavior detection and automated threat response. Key features include autonomous threat prioritization, asset tracking, and deep forensic analysis. Seqrite Endpoint Security, while valuable with its asset management, anti-ransomware abilities, and external device control, doesn’t match the level of AI and automation provided by SentinelOne.

Room for Improvement: SentinelOne could enhance custom reporting, policy controls, and the speed of console loading for large deployments. Additionally, improved integration with more IT and SIEM platforms would optimize operations. Seqrite needs to work on stability, macOS support, and enhancing remote management functionality. Better technical support and scalability improvements would also be beneficial for Seqrite to compete more effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers flexible deployment options, suitable for on-premises and cloud environments, and is praised for responsive customer service. Seqrite focuses more on on-premises and private cloud solutions, providing ease of management but facing scalability challenges. Customer support responses from Seqrite could be quicker.

Pricing and ROI: While SentinelOne is on the higher end price-wise, its comprehensive features offer a solid ROI through automation and reduced manual efforts. Its pricing remains competitive compared to other top-tier solutions like CrowdStrike, providing flexibility for large enterprises. Seqrite, however, appeals to smaller enterprises with its more budget-friendly pricing but lacks some of the advanced functionalities offered by SentinelOne. For those balancing cost and extensive features, SentinelOne provides better long-term value despite a higher initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint is 4.4%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 0.9%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint	4.4%
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	0.9%
Other	90.9%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Vaibhav Mahendra Kolhe

Soc Analyst at Softcell Technologies Limited

Automation has reduced alerts and freed the soc team to focus on faster incident response

Regarding mean time to respond, the improvements I see with SentinelOne Singularity Complete are that genuine files also get alerts. We are getting false positives, but we are also getting genuine true positive alerts. The improvement will be deep visibility because as I am using Splunk as a SIEM, I compare deep visibility with Splunk, but deep visibility has limited access with only a 14-day policy to retain logs. The improvement will be in overall policy management. The third point will be the complexity of policies. If we want some endpoints to use only USB or if we need to block USB on some points, the policy management is very complex. The fourth point will be that Mac OS and Linux don't have the rollback policy; that policy is only for Windows. These four points are improvements if SentinelOne Singularity Complete can address them. Data privacy and security when utilizing Purple AI is crucial for SentinelOne Singularity Complete, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete lacks in data security. Data security is very important in this world. In my organization, if we deploy SentinelOne Singularity Complete and we have integrated all the firewalls, all devices, and AWS devices to SentinelOne Singularity Complete, logs will be forwarded to SentinelOne Singularity Complete through SentinelOne Singularity Complete. However, SentinelOne Singularity Complete doesn't have data security solutions such as Forcepoint DLP or 48 layer; SentinelOne Singularity Complete doesn't have that DLP solution. From the data security point of view, SentinelOne Singularity Complete is not good.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is easy to use and does not consume a lot of hardware resources."

"On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks a nine."

"It'll not slow down your system when compared to others."

"The integrations are out-of-the-box, as are the playbooks."

"Once you become familiar with it, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a more powerful tool and I would say that I prefer it over MDE because it is a stronger tool for me."

"We can use Cortex XDR to get the entire graph of the incidents from source to destination, and we can take remedial action."

"Monitoring is most valuable."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The most valuable features are forensic investigation and ransomware prevention."

"We have had very few false positives or false negatives, which allows our analysts to focus on their work instead of dealing with noise."

"SentinelOne is preferred because of its great features and nominal cost."

"The terminating or killing remediation process that they use is top-notch. Pretty much anything that is even remotely malicious gets blocked by it within seconds. That is important for us. We have thousands of endpoints with tens of thousands of users. It is hard to do good security for that many people without some kind of automated detection and response. That is what SentinelOne does for us. It helps us automate that process."

"We moved from ESET, and we find that the licensing scheme, particularly how the licenses are attributed to clients, is pretty nice compared to what ESET offers."

"Singularity Platform's real-time personalization feature has helped our customer experience strategies by allowing us to have different workspaces where we have custom views, and depending on the use case because we have many products that use Singularity Platform, they interact with the UI in different ways, producing different elements and giving us tailored views for different products."

"Overall, the time saved, lower incident impact, and improved security confidence clearly justified the investment."

"The most valuable features are asset tracking, patching, endpoint tagging, and policy updates."

More SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint pros

"The solution effectively detects malicious files and blocks sign-ins."

"The most valuable part of the solution is its ransomware backup feature."

"Endpoint Security's best features are inventory, asset management, and quick scanning."

"I like Seqrite's web protection features and external device control."

"Seqrite Endpoint Security is a good solution."

"We found the DLP to be innovative and useful."

"The solution is stable."

"The setup process was easy for our remote clients and us as well."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"In terms of areas of improvement, we have not completed our review of the product. We're also looking at other products. So, it's a little bit hard to tell what could be different because we have not completed the review of this product, but based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

"They've been having some issues with updating their endpoint agents, and it has been quite frustrating."

"A little bit more automation would be nice."

"I would like to see improvement in the tool's user interface, particularly in the area of managing alerts and providing more reporting capabilities."

"There is also no recovery feature; if some endpoint is under attack there must be the possibility of recovering it or restoring it to a normal state."

"There are some false positives."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks could improve by adding a sandbox feature to better compete with their competitors which have it."

"To jump from the partner to Palo Alto directly was challenging."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Sometimes I get a response from them, but at times they may not have answers and defer to the engineering team, which can prolong the resolution time beyond expectations for customer satisfaction."

"It's fine. It's correcting all the EFC files with a virus. All the achievements, maximum EFC files. Many EFC files will be flagged as a virus. Some virus databases need to be updated. The model is good at finding many EFC files. The trouble is it needs to be updated."

"Singularity Complete's process stream has room for improvement."

"It primarily operates on local machines, monitoring processes, and not always providing detailed insights, relying on external information to determine the nature of a file."

"However, for complex cases—especially agent-related problems—we sometimes need remote assistance, and that level of support is not included in the basic subscription."

"Some features could be more user-friendly; for instance, setting restrictions in the explorer for what level one must be to use it is not user-friendly and it is difficult to find what we're searching for."

"SentinelOne Singularity Complete is the best EDR in the market, but it will evolve, though I have concerns about using US partners in Europe due to the geopolitical context. It is better to work with European companies."

"SentinelOne needs to improve its endpoint deployment process."

More SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint cons

"User management is not that good currently, and so we have trouble with handling user management."

"When we fire any employee connected remotely over the internet, we need a security feature that blocks the system and the device."

"I don't feel that the scalability part of Seqrite Endpoint Security is better than the other products in the market."

"User management could be improved."

"Sometimes, small and medium businesses, or even startups with just five, ten, or fifteen systems, are also keen to secure their data. There is a reluctance on the part of the technical team to extend installation support when the opportunity sizes are smaller. Seqrite Endpoint Security has a lot of value. Still, its marketing could be done much better on a larger scale, especially in India, in light of the new DPDP 2023 Act, which the Indian Parliament passed. It would be even more valuable if Seqrite could incorporate features to help companies comply with this law, it would be even more helpful."

"The solution needs to improve stability."

"Endpoint Security would be improved by adding DLP."

"It should be able to detect and report any ransomware attack but currently, it doesn't detect and it doesn't report any."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has one subscription for endpoint protection and one subscription for detection and response. The two licenses combined give you the BRO version."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"It is "expensive" and flexible."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"You have to look at the kinds of problems you can end up with and the fact that you want security against them, and then SentinelOne is not expensive."

"SentinelOne Singularity Complete meets all enterprise requirements and is priced accordingly."

"Our licensing fees are about $5 USD per endpoint, per month."

"For our use case, the solution is affordable. There are not any hidden fees."

"I can pay, for my environment, between $30,000 and $40,000 a year, and that's a pretty good deal."

"The product's pricing is at par with what you see among major competitors. It's higher than McAfee, yet cheaper than CrowdStrike."

"It is comparatively cheap in the market and provides a good price point."

"The per-seat cost is low, but you have to commit to a certain number of licenses for a year."

More SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint pricing and cost advice

"You need to pay for a yearly license for Seqrite Endpoint Security, which is expensive."

"Endpoint Security is cheaper than Trend Micro."

"We get the tool for around 1200 rupees for a three-year subscription. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"My company needs to purchase a yearly subscription for the licensing costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security."

"The license isn't expensive."

"The licensing fee is 200 Bangladeshi Taka per client per year."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

"There is no option to refund the money and unfortunately, we bought a three-year license, seeing that Quick Heal is a long-established player in the market."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	139
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	98

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Which is better - SentinelOne or Darktrace?

Which solution is better depends on which is more suitable specifically for your company. Darktrace, for example, is ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Singularity?

It is neither too costly, but definitely, it is one of the advantages that SentinelOne is quite adapted towards the p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SentinelOne Singularity?

I have encountered an issue related to the alerting mechanism in SentinelOne Singularity Complete. Sometimes I need t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint

Compared 3% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint

Compared 2% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint Competitors

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

BigFix vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 3% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

October 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint

October 2026

Download SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

October 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Sentinel Labs, SentinelOne Singularity, Singularity Platform

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is an advanced endpoint security platform featuring centralized management across multiple locations. It leverages AI-driven behavior detection, threat prioritization, and ransomware rollback for enhanced protection and streamlined operations.

With a focus on endpoint protection, threat detection, and automated response, SentinelOne Singularity Complete provides comprehensive security through AI-powered behavioral analysis and real-time threat detection. The centralized console simplifies management, offering seamless integration and minimal system impact. Its robust reporting capabilities facilitate compliance with audit-ready reports. Lightweight agents operate across diverse environments, improving visibility and performance while curbing manual efforts. To optimize its utility, faster console load times and improved customizability in reports and dashboards are recommended. Users may benefit from smoother integration with IT tools and enhanced policy management flexibility, as well as upgraded agent processes and simplified endpoint deployment. Expanding built-in analytics and refining alert management can further heighten platform efficacy.

What are the key features of SentinelOne Singularity Complete?

AI-Powered Detection: Utilizes advanced AI to identify potential threats based on behavior.
Automatic Remediation: Automatically rectifies detected issues, reducing response times.
Ransomware Rollback: Restores data to previous states if affected by ransomware attacks.
Centralized Dashboards: Provides real-time insights through intuitive dashboards.
Threat Prioritization: Identifies and ranks threats based on potential impact.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Integration: Seamlessly connects with security solutions to enhance risk management.
Minimal System Impact: Operates efficiently, preserving system performance.
Enhanced Protection: Delivers robust threat defense through AI-driven technology.
Compliance Support: Offers detailed reporting for audit readiness.
User Convenience: Combines autonomous decision-making with an intuitive interface.

In various industries, SentinelOne Singularity Complete is implemented for endpoint protection and incident management. Companies rely on it for its real-time threat detection and automated response capabilities, ensuring compliance and reduced manual intervention. Its adaptive nature supports diverse environments, enhancing operational efficiency.

SentinelOne

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Havas, Flex, Estee Lauder, McKesson, Norfolk Southern, JetBlue, Norwegian airlines, TGI Friday, AVX, Fim Bank

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Free Report: SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.