BigFix vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

HCLSoftware and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HCLSoftware is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.3, while Seqrite is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.5. HCLSoftware holds a 1.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

BigFix and Seqrite Endpoint Security compete in endpoint security. Seqrite appears to have the upper hand with targeted security focus, despite BigFix having better support and pricing.

Features: BigFix offers comprehensive asset management, real-time visibility, and automated patch management. Seqrite provides robust antivirus capabilities, ransomware protection, and data loss prevention features. Both offer extensive feature sets, but Seqrite’s targeted security focus may appeal more to organizations prioritizing direct threat defense.

Room for Improvement: BigFix needs a more intuitive reporting system, faster issue resolution, and refined analytics tools. Seqrite requires enhancements in system performance, more detailed documentation, and better user guidance. BigFix’s potential can be increased by refining analytics tools, while Seqrite benefits from performance optimization and better user guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BigFix is praised for its straightforward deployment process and effective customer support but can be complex initially. Seqrite is commended for easy deployment and proactive customer service. Seqrite seems to have a smoother deployment experience with supportive user feedback on customer service.

Pricing and ROI: BigFix offers flexible pricing models that are cost-effective in the long run, with satisfactory ROI due to integrated solutions. Seqrite, while perceived as pricier, provides value through extensive security features and consistent performance, resulting in favorable ROI. BigFix leads in cost management, whereas Seqrite’s value justifies its higher price for comprehensive endpoint security.

To learn more, read our detailed BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BigFix is 1.7%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.7%
BigFix	1.7%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	1.0%
Other	93.6%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Ravi Khanchandani

Founder Director at Techsa Services

Long-term partnership improves customer satisfaction and delivers efficient endpoint management

BigFix supports something known as Patch Policies, which allows users to define that whenever critical patches are released, they should get evaluated against machines and automatically deploy them. Their software distribution is very efficient because they use a pull mechanism rather than a push mechanism, allowing each machine to download from the closest repository and install themselves. The same assessment mechanism applies for real-time vulnerability remediation, allowing identification, evaluation, and automatic remediation across machines. Compliance metrics typically measure the patch percentages deployed against the number of endpoints, which could be various device types including virtual machines and mobile devices. Measurements are taken against each device type, looking into compliance percentages for browsers such as Chrome and Edge based on their versions.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The policy configuration is great, the granularity of policies that are available is very helpful, it is straightforward to set up, and it has pretty much everything we need and works well within the Palo Alto ecosystem."

"I have found the solution to be very easy in respect of the integration and configurable."

"I can highlight that we have not faced any security incidents with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, and even though our environment is quite dynamic, we have not faced any security incident with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks until now."

"The best feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it collects logs from different sections such as the endpoint, the network, and the cloud, making it easy to investigate alerts, collect some of the investigation packages related to the infected machines, and provide live response."

"It collects and caches and the knowledge of machine learning from different customers to take to the cloud, it makes it better to use for everybody, it allows for quick learning and updates and can, therefore, offer zero-day malware security, and this sharing of metadata helps make the solution very safe."

"It is a simple platform to use."

"WildFire AI is the best option for this product."

"Automation and playbooks have helped me significantly, as Cortex Xnor's playbooks predefine the workflow of the automation, such as response processes, alert triggering, and enriching the context, efficiently detecting and blocking malicious attacks with firewalls while eliminating workload and speeding responses for next-generation operations."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It allows for visibility into the OT, the industrial environments, that didn't exist before which is a big piece and has benefited my organization. Second, the speed at which people can patch is night and day versus SCCM scan or another similar solution."

"It has plugins development options, which are great."

"It is a highly effective tool if you're cross-platform."

"The tool's most valuable features are patching and integration with vulnerability scanners."

"The most valuable feature of BigFix is the reporting tool and patching Windows."

"I believe that the agent on the endpoint is very powerful."

"BigFix is easy to use."

"The product is less costly when compared to other solutions, and this is a good solid solution for what we have paid."

More BigFix pros

"We were excited about the cloud-based management features of Seqrite and were looking to use the same."

"The update process and policy control are good."

"I like Seqrite's web protection features and external device control."

"In case it works, we are looking to use features like USB blocking, file upload alerts, and other antivirus features as well, but this software has to work first."

"The solution's current features include antivirus, web filtering, file activity monitoring, PAM, firewall, IDS/IPS, and DLP. Though I'm not familiar with the whole solution, it is good."

"Endpoint Security's best features are inventory, asset management, and quick scanning."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"There are many features available in this solution, such as asset management."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks could improve its user interface, which is more complicated compared to competitors such as SentinelOne."

"Previously, the endpoint would leave the environment, not being on our VPN, essentially unable to interact with the server to upload files. It was unable to retrieve new file verdicts. It was using a thing called "local analysis" to determine if something was a malicious file or not. There was no dynamic analysis."

"They have the worst support, as a company, that I have ever worked with, as they are difficult to get a hold of and keep on the phone. They don't know what they are talking about when you get them on the phone. They don't like to respond to messages when you send them to them. They like to "research problems" for weeks on end, then pass you off to somebody else."

"The downsides of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks are that in many incidents, when I enter the causality chain, there are numerous logs."

"The solution eats memory of the computer, unlike anything I've ever seen."

"In an upcoming release, the solution could improve by proving hard disk encryption. If it could support this it would be a complete solution."

"The technical support is not very good. I find the process difficult."

"Based on our experience so far, its implementation is quite complex."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The solution should have some kind of a local caching methodology, where the patches can be taken locally into a localized relay server, and from there, the patch can be applied, so that there is not much usage of the network required."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"Dynamic messaging needs improvement because one of the things that we deal with a lot is the messaging when pushing releases out."

"I remember doing restarts a few times. So, making sure that it is rock solid from an executable perspective is important."

"Technical support is getting better. About five years ago, it was horrible."

"Technical support depends on who you get. I deal with some amazing support folks, and then I've dealt with some less-than-amazing support folks."

"Sometimes there can be a delay reporting back to the server for a variety of reasons, such as users turning their computer off when they go home."

"I would like to see different types of reporting and the ability to integrate closer with the cloud."

More BigFix cons

"We would like the solution to have integration with other security solutions so that we can have a single base for monitoring all the security incidents and concerns."

"Sometimes, small and medium businesses, or even startups with just five, ten, or fifteen systems, are also keen to secure their data. There is a reluctance on the part of the technical team to extend installation support when the opportunity sizes are smaller. Seqrite Endpoint Security has a lot of value. Still, its marketing could be done much better on a larger scale, especially in India, in light of the new DPDP 2023 Act, which the Indian Parliament passed. It would be even more valuable if Seqrite could incorporate features to help companies comply with this law, it would be even more helpful."

"The support offered by the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"When it comes to the support provided by the product, I see that Seqrite is not as mature as the other products in the market."

"The stability is zero, Seqrite doesn't work, and the company doesn't accept the problems."

"The product or service could be improved by incorporating SIEM integrations to enable the collection of logs."

"I don't feel that the scalability part of Seqrite Endpoint Security is better than the other products in the market."

"User management could be improved."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"The price of the product is not very economical."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require."

"This is an expensive solution."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice."

"The price was fine."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"It is too costly. It is one of the best tools, but because of pricing, not all clients support it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"I can estimate the reduced cost of servers maintenance to approximatively $500,000."

"You are charged per server and per workstation when using BigFix. ManageEngine is a lot cheaper than BigFix. There are some additional costs, such as support."

"The license is subscription-based."

"You get what we call the Platform Edition, which you get for free. The patch service is maybe $0.50 per workstation per month. Then there's the basic server cost, which is about $1.50 per server per month. You also get into Lifecycle which does power management, OSD remote control, and those types of things, and that might be about 10 times the price - which works out to about $13 per server and, maybe $5 per workstation per month."

"The price is very fair."

"So, the pricing is slightly more expensive than the others. I have to keep buying licenses every time I add a new device."

"Its price is very reasonable."

More BigFix pricing and cost advice

"Though I don't think that this is a cheaply priced product, I feel that it is an affordable solution."

"I give the cost of the solution a seven out of ten."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

"As per the suggestions from one of the experts we know, it is advisable to make a proper comparison with the local vendors instead of solely relying on online prices, which are often higher and quite expensive."

"There is no option to refund the money and unfortunately, we bought a three-year license, seeing that Quick Heal is a long-established player in the market."

"We pay approximately $1,500 for licenses for the solution."

"The solution has reasonable pricing. There is one pricing without any hidden charges. They have to pay once a year or three years."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis. Compared to other solutions, this solution is cheaper."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	67

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigFix?

The pricing is pretty good and now follows a subscription model similar to other major software solutions, making it ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BigFix?

I have concerns about BigFix's pricing, which I find to be slightly on the higher side. While it may not be the most ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BigFix?

I have been working at Tech Data for the last 12 plus years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's pricing is good for us, where it is neither cheap nor expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Tanium vs BigFix

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs BigFix

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs BigFix

Compared 4% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs BigFix

Compared 2% of the time

HashiCorp Terraform vs BigFix

Compared 2% of the time

More BigFix Competitors

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

June 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

BigFix

June 2026

Download BigFix product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

May 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Tivoli Endpoint Manager

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Palo Alto Networks

HCLSoftware

Demo not available

Seqrite

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

HCL BigFix offers a Unified Endpoint Management platform that enhances security, reduces costs, and simplifies IT operations across hybrid, multi-cloud environments through a centralized control structure.

BigFix streamlines enterprise IT management by integrating infrastructure security, endpoint remediation, and employee experience automation within a single platform. It enables IT Operations and Security teams to function efficiently from a unified control plane, managing over 155 million endpoints. Its robust architecture supports continuous compliance and automated vulnerability remediation, closing the gap between detection and fix. It excels in digital employee experience by ensuring proactive monitoring and utilizing agentic AI for self-healing workflows and intelligent automation, thereby reducing manual efforts and enhancing productivity.

What are BigFix's key features?

Efficient Patch Management: Automates and optimizes patch distribution across platforms.
Compliance Integration: Ensures robust adherence to compliance standards through automated processes.
Scalability: Capable of managing and securing an extensive range of endpoints.
Multi-Platform Support: Provides management for various operating systems through a single console.
Customization Options: Enables API-based customizations and versatile reporting capabilities.

What are potential benefits and ROI factors?

Enhanced Security: Swift vulnerability management reduces risk exposure.
Cost Efficiency: Centralized management minimizes operational complexities and expenses.
Operational Resilience: Maintains compliance and security across distributed environments.
Ease of Management: Simplifies diverse environment management with robust tools.
Boost in Productivity: Reduces manual IT efforts while improving employee experience.

Industries such as telecom, finance, and industrial facilities leverage BigFix for comprehensive patch management, software deployment, and inventory solutions. They benefit from its capacity to support endpoint security, compliance, and diverse operational needs, using it for vulnerability assessment and custom content creation.

HCLSoftware

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

US Foods, Penn State, St Vincent's Health US Foods, Sabadell Bank, SunTrust, Australia Sydney, Stemac, Capgemini, WNS Global Services, Jebsen & Jessen, CenterBeam, Strauss, Christian Hospital Centre, Brit Insurance, Career Education Corporation

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

June 2026

Free Report: BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.