BigFix vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

HCLSoftware and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HCLSoftware is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.3, while Seqrite is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.5. HCLSoftware holds a 1.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

BigFix and Seqrite Endpoint Security compete in endpoint security. Seqrite appears to have the upper hand with targeted security focus, despite BigFix having better support and pricing.

Features: BigFix offers comprehensive asset management, real-time visibility, and automated patch management. Seqrite provides robust antivirus capabilities, ransomware protection, and data loss prevention features. Both offer extensive feature sets, but Seqrite’s targeted security focus may appeal more to organizations prioritizing direct threat defense.

Room for Improvement: BigFix needs a more intuitive reporting system, faster issue resolution, and refined analytics tools. Seqrite requires enhancements in system performance, more detailed documentation, and better user guidance. BigFix’s potential can be increased by refining analytics tools, while Seqrite benefits from performance optimization and better user guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BigFix is praised for its straightforward deployment process and effective customer support but can be complex initially. Seqrite is commended for easy deployment and proactive customer service. Seqrite seems to have a smoother deployment experience with supportive user feedback on customer service.

Pricing and ROI: BigFix offers flexible pricing models that are cost-effective in the long run, with satisfactory ROI due to integrated solutions. Seqrite, while perceived as pricier, provides value through extensive security features and consistent performance, resulting in favorable ROI. BigFix leads in cost management, whereas Seqrite’s value justifies its higher price for comprehensive endpoint security.

To learn more, read our detailed BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BigFix is 1.7%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.7%
BigFix	1.7%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	1.0%
Other	93.6%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Ravi Khanchandani

Founder Director at Techsa Services

Long-term partnership improves customer satisfaction and delivers efficient endpoint management

BigFix supports something known as Patch Policies, which allows users to define that whenever critical patches are released, they should get evaluated against machines and automatically deploy them. Their software distribution is very efficient because they use a pull mechanism rather than a push mechanism, allowing each machine to download from the closest repository and install themselves. The same assessment mechanism applies for real-time vulnerability remediation, allowing identification, evaluation, and automatic remediation across machines. Compliance metrics typically measure the patch percentages deployed against the number of endpoints, which could be various device types including virtual machines and mobile devices. Measurements are taken against each device type, looking into compliance percentages for browsers such as Chrome and Edge based on their versions.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We switched because there were a lot of added features with Palo Alto that Check Point didn't have, and it was an upgrade for us."

"In one single alert, we are getting the network telemetry, endpoint telemetry, email security telemetry, and proxy telemetry all in one single ticket, making it very easy."

"The one feature of Palo Alto Networks Traps that our organization finds most valuable is the App ID service."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"The most valuable aspect of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for me is its integration with AI detection, where we get to know the behavioral detection based on users, traffic patterns, and different services that we consume."

"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."

"The product is very good, it has caught a lot of exploits that most products would not."

"The most valuable features of this product are the management capabilities, which allow an IT organization to get quite a good picture of attempted cyber attacks, and its out-of-the-box investigation capabilities."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Being able to intelligently create reports, gather data, export CSVs and give that to the leadership of some of the client groups that my team supports has been a benefit to my organization."

"BigFix has always been easier to use when managing servers, especially when you deal with so many servers. We have 7,000. That's a lot of services to manage, and it's convenient to patch them all at once."

"Due to the automation, we've been able to prevent a lot of human errors with BigFix so it's reduced our help desk calls by 50%."

"If you utilize the tool to the maximum capacity available to you, your ROI is significantly five to seven-fold over cost."

"We've been able to fully automate our TWS installs, to the point where a user requests it and we don't do anything."

"With BigFix, in 10 to 15 minutes, you're up and running."

"The solution has many useful features; its main advantage is simplicity—you can do everything from one console, regardless of the task, and it supports many operating systems and is scalable to up to 250,000 clients."

"The combination of CyFIR and BigFix has allowed one of our major customers, one of the top Fortune 50 financial firms in the world, to reduce their forensic investigator count by about 4 FTE with the combination of CyFIR and BigFix."

More BigFix pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are DLP, XDR, and EDR functionalities."

"The two valuable features are anti-ransomware and data loss protection."

"The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use."

"The solution's current features include antivirus, web filtering, file activity monitoring, PAM, firewall, IDS/IPS, and DLP. Though I'm not familiar with the whole solution, it is good."

"There are many features available in this solution, such as asset management."

"The only thing that I have found useful is that I have an overview of my systems in the networks."

"The solution is stable."

"The update process and policy control are good."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"As an improvement, I would like to see enhanced connection speeds."

"If Palo Alto reduces the pricing slightly for their products, it would make them more scalable in markets such as India and globally for cybersecurity."

"I have run into some detection issues with Cortex XDR. It needs to be better at detection of internal attacks."

"There are some limitations on the Traps agents."

"Traps doesn't work with McAfee. You need to remove McAfee to install Traps. This is very common, and its nothing that should be an issue. Some antivirus engines recognize Traps as an threat component, so maybe they need to shake hands somewhere."

"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR does not detect malicious activity like in other anti-virus solutions like Trend Micro and Windows with Cisco."

"The GUI could be improved. It's a little bit cumbersome. It could be more user-friendly."

"In an upcoming release, the solution could improve by proving hard disk encryption. If it could support this it would be a complete solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"I would like to see improvements in the Web UI program and also a BigFix console for Mac OS."

"I would like to see much better web reporting because as it is now, it's convoluted, basic, it's not modern, and there are limitations to it."

"For improvements, it would be good if BigFix supported more databases. Currently, it only supports DB2 and Microsoft SQL. Adding support for other databases like Oracle would be beneficial."

"The first setup was complex."

"The self-service application seems to need some work to replace the client UI. There are a lot of pop-ups if you use a baseline as the object that you're setting to a workstation. Unless you're using web UI, the message is not customizable in the user notification."

"One aspect that could be improved is the speed of the console. Sometimes it can be slow, which is something that needs to be addressed."

"I would like to see for it to be a little easier for new users to be able to learn and create relevant statements."

"The reporting still needs improvement since customers want specific reporting, such as N-1 month patching reports."

More BigFix cons

"The interface is slow."

"When we fire any employee connected remotely over the internet, we need a security feature that blocks the system and the device."

"We are using Apple devices, and the advanced device control service doesn't work for M1 chips devices, like Apple MacBooks."

"I would like to see Seqrite add a remote profile so we can implement different policies for users connecting to the in-office LAN and those accessing the office network from home or a public internet connection."

"It should be able to detect and report any ransomware attack but currently, it doesn't detect and it doesn't report any."

"The pricing could be a bit lower."

"The solution could integrate with other products to provide a comprehensive protection strategy."

"Deployment of Seqrite Endpoint Security is generally straightforward. The only complexity we encounter is that, since it is cloud-based, there can be delays in updating the endpoint's status."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"Very costly product."

"The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"It is too costly. It is one of the best tools, but because of pricing, not all clients support it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing one out of ten."

"There's not much big cost. We only have to pay the agents' cost for the server, and for the systems."

"I can estimate the reduced cost of servers maintenance to approximatively $500,000."

"The price of the solution is high. There are not any additional fees from the standard license."

"The price of BigFix is better than the solutions. You are able to pay monthly or annually. There are not any hidden costs with BigFix. There is an additional cost for the SQL database."

"You get what we call the Platform Edition, which you get for free. The patch service is maybe $0.50 per workstation per month. Then there's the basic server cost, which is about $1.50 per server per month. You also get into Lifecycle which does power management, OSD remote control, and those types of things, and that might be about 10 times the price - which works out to about $13 per server and, maybe $5 per workstation per month."

"The cost is slightly high."

More BigFix pricing and cost advice

"The solution has reasonable pricing. There is one pricing without any hidden charges. They have to pay once a year or three years."

"My company needs to purchase a yearly subscription for the licensing costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security."

"Endpoint Security is cheaper than Trend Micro."

"The licensing fee is 200 Bangladeshi Taka per client per year."

"Though I don't think that this is a cheaply priced product, I feel that it is an affordable solution."

"The license isn't expensive."

"As per the suggestions from one of the experts we know, it is advisable to make a proper comparison with the local vendors instead of solely relying on online prices, which are often higher and quite expensive."

"We get the tool for around 1200 rupees for a three-year subscription. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	67

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigFix?

The pricing is pretty good and now follows a subscription model similar to other major software solutions, making it ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BigFix?

I have concerns about BigFix's pricing, which I find to be slightly on the higher side. While it may not be the most ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BigFix?

I have been working at Tech Data for the last 12 plus years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's pricing is good for us, where it is neither cheap nor expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Tanium vs BigFix

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs BigFix

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs BigFix

Compared 4% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs BigFix

Compared 2% of the time

HashiCorp Terraform vs BigFix

Compared 2% of the time

More BigFix Competitors

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

June 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

BigFix

June 2026

Download BigFix product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

May 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Tivoli Endpoint Manager

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Palo Alto Networks

HCLSoftware

Demo not available

Seqrite

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

HCL BigFix offers a Unified Endpoint Management platform that enhances security, reduces costs, and simplifies IT operations across hybrid, multi-cloud environments through a centralized control structure.

BigFix streamlines enterprise IT management by integrating infrastructure security, endpoint remediation, and employee experience automation within a single platform. It enables IT Operations and Security teams to function efficiently from a unified control plane, managing over 155 million endpoints. Its robust architecture supports continuous compliance and automated vulnerability remediation, closing the gap between detection and fix. It excels in digital employee experience by ensuring proactive monitoring and utilizing agentic AI for self-healing workflows and intelligent automation, thereby reducing manual efforts and enhancing productivity.

What are BigFix's key features?

Efficient Patch Management: Automates and optimizes patch distribution across platforms.
Compliance Integration: Ensures robust adherence to compliance standards through automated processes.
Scalability: Capable of managing and securing an extensive range of endpoints.
Multi-Platform Support: Provides management for various operating systems through a single console.
Customization Options: Enables API-based customizations and versatile reporting capabilities.

What are potential benefits and ROI factors?

Enhanced Security: Swift vulnerability management reduces risk exposure.
Cost Efficiency: Centralized management minimizes operational complexities and expenses.
Operational Resilience: Maintains compliance and security across distributed environments.
Ease of Management: Simplifies diverse environment management with robust tools.
Boost in Productivity: Reduces manual IT efforts while improving employee experience.

Industries such as telecom, finance, and industrial facilities leverage BigFix for comprehensive patch management, software deployment, and inventory solutions. They benefit from its capacity to support endpoint security, compliance, and diverse operational needs, using it for vulnerability assessment and custom content creation.

HCLSoftware

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

US Foods, Penn State, St Vincent's Health US Foods, Sabadell Bank, SunTrust, Australia Sydney, Stemac, Capgemini, WNS Global Services, Jebsen & Jessen, CenterBeam, Strauss, Christian Hospital Centre, Brit Insurance, Career Education Corporation

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

June 2026

Free Report: BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.