Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
BigFix Logo

Top 10 BigFix Alternatives

Vendor: HCLSoftware
4.3 out of 5
Badge Leader
2,717 followers
Start review

Top BigFix Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to BigFix based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. BigFix surpasses its competitors by providing efficient endpoint management through rapid vulnerability remediation, real-time data visibility, and automated patching, allowing businesses to streamline operations and enhance security with minimal resource consumption.

HCLSoftware Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with HCLSoftware , and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
BigFix Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
BigFix Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in endpoint management with extensive patching and scalability. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat detection and AI-driven intelligence. Tech buyers might choose BigFix for flexibility, while CrowdStrike attracts those needing proactive security and rapid deployment.
Download BigFix vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
BigFix has a lower initial setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which requires higher upfront investment. CrowdStrike offers advanced features, justifying its setup cost, while BigFix provides a budget-friendly option without compromising essential security functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a lower initial setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which requires higher upfront investment. CrowdStrike offers advanced features, justifying its setup cost, while BigFix provides a budget-friendly option without compromising essential security functionalities.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
BigFix's strengths include patch management, compliance features, straightforward deployment, responsive customer service, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection, integration with Microsoft services, and ROI. BigFix offers simpler deployment while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides premium advanced capabilities.
Download BigFix vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
BigFix has an upfront setup cost that is higher than Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which is known for its lower initial expenses.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has an upfront setup cost that is higher than Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which is known for its lower initial expenses.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
BigFix offers extensive configuration for endpoint security management, focusing on patch management and software distribution. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in speed, automation, and real-time threat intelligence, making it suitable for environments prioritizing advanced threat detection and efficient deployment despite its higher cost.
Download BigFix vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
BigFix has an affordable setup cost according to reviews, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is more expensive. BigFix is often praised for its cost-effectiveness, whereas users report higher initial costs for SentinelOne Singularity Complete.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has an affordable setup cost according to reviews, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is more expensive. BigFix is often praised for its cost-effectiveness, whereas users report higher initial costs for SentinelOne Singularity Complete.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in patch management and endpoint visibility, making it a cost-effective choice with strong ROI. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint delivers advanced threat detection and automation capabilities, justifying its higher price. Tech buyers seeking cost efficiency may choose BigFix; those prioritizing features may prefer Cisco.
Download BigFix vs. Cisco Secure Endpoint Report
BigFix has a lower setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option, while Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a lower setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option, while Cisco Secure Endpoint has a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive feature set.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
BigFix shines in patch management, compliance, and automation, appealing to cost-conscious users. In comparison, Cortex XDR impresses with advanced threat detection and integration, justifying its higher investment. BigFix's device management contrasts with Cortex XDR's comprehensive security suite, catering to different security needs.
Download BigFix vs. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Report
BigFix has higher initial setup costs compared to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has higher initial setup costs compared to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
BigFix excels in patch management and reporting, while Fortinet FortiClient integrates seamlessly with Fortinet's security ecosystem and offers strong endpoint protection. In comparison, BigFix could improve its complexity and interface. Fortinet FortiClient's stability issues are more frequently highlighted by users.
Download BigFix vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
BigFix has higher initial setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiClient, making Fortinet FortiClient a more cost-effective option for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has higher initial setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiClient, making Fortinet FortiClient a more cost-effective option for initial implementation.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers advanced threat protection and comprehensive device management, making it attractive for budget-conscious users due to its competitive pricing and ROI. In comparison, BigFix stands out with robust automation capabilities and real-time visibility, delivering significant long-term value despite a complex setup process.
Download BigFix vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to BigFix, which requires a higher initial investment. BigFix, however, comes with more comprehensive features that may justify its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to BigFix, which requires a higher initial investment. BigFix, however, comes with more comprehensive features that may justify its higher setup cost.
BigFix Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
BigFix Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
BigFix offers competitive pricing and simplicity, with strong patch management and wide endpoint coverage. In comparison, Tanium excels in scalability and real-time data processing, providing advanced threat detection for large distributed networks. BigFix’s straightforward deployment contrasts with Tanium’s robust, albeit complex, setup.
Download BigFix vs. Tanium Report
BigFix's setup cost is generally more affordable compared to Tanium, which tends to have a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix's setup cost is generally more affordable compared to Tanium, which tends to have a higher initial investment.
BigFix Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
BigFix Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
BigFix is known for its robust patch management and software distribution capabilities, appealing to those requiring strong infrastructure controls. In comparison, HP Wolf Security offers enhanced threat isolation and user-friendly experience, making it attractive for those seeking comprehensive features and higher perceived value.
Download BigFix vs. HP Wolf Security Report
BigFix has an initial setup cost that is generally lower, while HP Wolf Security involves a higher setup cost but provides a more comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has an initial setup cost that is generally lower, while HP Wolf Security involves a higher setup cost but provides a more comprehensive feature set.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in pricing and support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, BigFix offers a comprehensive feature set, including advanced management and compliance tracking, attracting those who value extensive capabilities. Trellix is ideal for cost-effectiveness, while BigFix is chosen for its powerful features.
Download BigFix vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while BigFix's setup cost is higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while BigFix's setup cost is higher.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
BigFix excels in comprehensive patch management, asset discovery, and vulnerability management capabilities. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers effective threat detection, advanced malware protection, and seamless integration with other security solutions. Kaspersky's user-friendly interface and easier deployment appeal to tech buyers seeking streamlined management.
Download BigFix vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
BigFix has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a higher setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
BigFix offers comprehensive patch management and multi-platform support, appealing to users needing detailed security coverage. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint excels with AI threat detection and exploit prevention, ideal for buyers seeking advanced antivirus capabilities. BigFix’s pricing is competitive, whereas Intercept X Endpoint provides strong ROI through efficiency.
Download BigFix vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
BigFix often highlights its zero setup cost, providing immediate financial relief. Intercept X Endpoint, while effective, presents a higher initial setup fee. This cost contrast significantly impacts financial planning, making BigFix a more budget-friendly option initially.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix often highlights its zero setup cost, providing immediate financial relief. Intercept X Endpoint, while effective, presents a higher initial setup fee. This cost contrast significantly impacts financial planning, making BigFix a more budget-friendly option initially.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers lower cost, comprehensive threat detection, and responsive customer service. In comparison, BigFix excels in powerful patch management and detailed reporting capabilities. ESET is easier to deploy, whereas BigFix provides more configuration options despite higher complexity.
Download BigFix vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost according to user reviews, whereas BigFix reviewers mention higher setup costs. This difference in initial investment is a key consideration for companies with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost according to user reviews, whereas BigFix reviewers mention higher setup costs. This difference in initial investment is a key consideration for companies with budget constraints.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
BigFix is praised for its pricing and inventory management. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint stands out for its advanced threat prevention and superior security features. BigFix's deployment is straightforward, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint has more advanced features but requires a complex setup.
Download BigFix vs. Check Point Harmony Endpoint Report
BigFix has moderate setup costs, making it a more economical choice compared to Check Point Harmony Endpoint, which tends to have higher initial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has moderate setup costs, making it a more economical choice compared to Check Point Harmony Endpoint, which tends to have higher initial setup costs.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
BigFix is valued for efficient patch management, robust support, and cost-effective pricing. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in threat detection, behavioral monitoring, and advanced analytics. A tech buyer prioritizing endpoint management might choose BigFix, whereas security intelligence advocates might prefer VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
Download BigFix vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
BigFix setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive features, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup is more affordable with a focus on essential security tools.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive features, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup is more affordable with a focus on essential security tools.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
BigFix excels in endpoint management and automation with cost-effective setup and strong ROI. In comparison, Trellix ENS justifies its higher cost with advanced threat detection and comprehensive security features. BigFix offers user-friendly deployment, whereas Trellix ENS requires improvements in navigation and third-party integration.
Download BigFix vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report
BigFix has higher initial setup costs compared to Trellix ENS, which offers a more budget-friendly startup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has higher initial setup costs compared to Trellix ENS, which offers a more budget-friendly startup fee.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
BigFix offers strong patch management, valued for cross-platform ease and inventory management. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance excels with AI-driven threat prevention, ideal for zero-day protection. A tech buyer might choose BigFix for visibility, or Cylance for minimal resource use.
Download BigFix vs. BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity Report
BigFix has a lower setup cost compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. BlackBerry Cylance, while higher in initial cost, may offer advanced features justifying the investment.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a lower setup cost compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. BlackBerry Cylance, while higher in initial cost, may offer advanced features justifying the investment.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
BigFix excels in comprehensive patch management and automation, making it ideal for those needing strong integration and reporting. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security offers superior malware defense and quicker deployment, appealing to those seeking affordable solutions with robust malware protection and fast ROI.
Download BigFix vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report
BigFix has a higher setup cost compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security, making it more expensive initially. Seqrite Endpoint Security is more budget-friendly in terms of setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a higher setup cost compared to Seqrite Endpoint Security, making it more expensive initially. Seqrite Endpoint Security is more budget-friendly in terms of setup expenses.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
GravityZone Business Security
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in patch management and endpoint security, optimal for large enterprises. In comparison, GravityZone Business Security attracts users with advanced threat protection and machine learning. BigFix is noted for its cost-effectiveness and customer support, while GravityZone offers cutting-edge features and quicker deployment.
Download BigFix vs. GravityZone Business Security Report
BigFix offers a higher setup cost compared to GravityZone Business Security. Users note that BigFix's initial expense is significant while GravityZone Business Security is more budget-friendly for smaller operations.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix offers a higher setup cost compared to GravityZone Business Security. Users note that BigFix's initial expense is significant while GravityZone Business Security is more budget-friendly for smaller operations.
BigFix Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
BigFix Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
BigFix is known for its comprehensive patch management and extensive functionality. In comparison, Automox excels in user-friendly interfaces and automation efficiency. BigFix's strength lies in its robust system, while Automox offers quick, easy cloud-based deployment, appealing to smaller IT teams.
Download Automox vs. BigFix Report
BigFix has higher setup costs, while Automox offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has higher setup costs, while Automox offers a more budget-friendly setup.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Trend Micro ServerProtect
3.9 out of 5
BigFix is favored for its automation capabilities and competitive pricing. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect offers superior features like malware detection. BigFix users appreciate its straightforward deployment and support, while Trend Micro ServerProtect's extensive feature set delivers strong ROI despite its higher cost.
Download BigFix vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report
BigFix has a relatively low initial setup cost, while Trend Micro ServerProtect requires a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a relatively low initial setup cost, while Trend Micro ServerProtect requires a higher upfront investment.
BigFix Logo
BigFix Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is known for cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment. In comparison, BigFix excels in feature richness and efficiency in large-scale environments. Buyers may prefer Ivanti for its faster ROI, while others might choose BigFix for its robust patch management and long-term benefits.
Download BigFix vs. Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while BigFix involves a more complex setup with higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while BigFix involves a more complex setup with higher upfront expenses.
BigFix Logo
Jamf Protect
4.7 out of 5
BigFix Logo
Jamf Protect
4.7 out of 5
BigFix excels in device management and security compliance, offering comprehensive features and robust endpoint management. In comparison, Jamf Protect specializes in Apple device protection, standing out with seamless integration with other Jamf products. BigFix is more versatile, while Jamf Protect delivers specialized macOS protection.
Download BigFix vs. Jamf Protect Report
BigFix has lower setup costs compared to Jamf Protect, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Jamf Protect, however, offers higher setup costs, which might indicate more robust initial configuration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has lower setup costs compared to Jamf Protect, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Jamf Protect, however, offers higher setup costs, which might indicate more robust initial configuration needs.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Configuration Management
Patch Management