BigFix vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection comparison

HCLSoftware and OpenText are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HCLSoftware is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.7, while OpenText is ranked #35. HCLSoftware holds a 1.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to OpenText’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

BigFix and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint management and security category. BigFix seems to have the upper hand with its extensive customization and integration features, which offer a wider range of compliance standards and seamless integration into development processes.

Features: BigFix offers extensive support for multiple operating systems and third-party applications, real-time vulnerability remediation, and a high degree of customization. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection focuses on lightweight protection with AI capabilities, cloud-based management, and a low overhead on devices.

Room for Improvement: BigFix requires enhancements in automation and integration with third-party applications, improvements in the web UI, and faster console operations. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection could improve detection capabilities, provide more comprehensive reporting features, and advance ransomware protection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BigFix is primarily on-premises, appealing to large-scale in-house environments but facing challenges in scalability. Its customer support is mixed. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection supports flexible deployments, including public, private, and hybrid clouds, offering easier scalability. Customer service is satisfactory but lacks detailed feedback compared to BigFix.

Pricing and ROI: BigFix is moderately priced with flexible licensing models, but costs can increase with deployment scale. It offers significant ROI due to its comprehensive features. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is seen as more cost-effective with a straightforward pricing structure.

To learn more, read our detailed BigFix vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BigFix vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BigFix is 1.7%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.9%
BigFix	1.7%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	1.7%
Other	92.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

InderjeetSingh4

Administrator at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

End-to-end automation has simplified patching and software deployment across thousands of servers

There is one feature in BigFix called the automation patch policy that requires enhancement. When an action is initiated through the patch policy, it appears on the console but arrives in chunks. When targeting hundreds of servers from the patch policy, the actions come in chunks such as ten out of six, ten out of nine, or ten out of fifteen. This fragmented approach creates a significant challenge for the patching team to monitor the action status. I would recommend that the development team provide a single action or one to two actions instead of multiple actions requiring individual monitoring. A broad status update could be provided to the client indicating the overall progress of the patch policy implementation rather than requiring monitoring of every individual action. This would reduce the bandwidth required by the team to track multiple actions on the console.

Read full review

reviewer2584380

vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improving threat detection is critical for enhanced protection

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is easy to use."

"We can visualize and control the activities in the environment from anywhere."

"The most valuable feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is the low consumption of system resources. The solution uses a lot of AI and machine learning."

"After installing this solution, it identified, blocked, and provided the complete attack chain, which was very helpful."

"On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks a nine."

"My advice for others looking into using Cortex is that it is very easy to use and very useful for the customer environment, whether it's a public or private one."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has helped lighten the load of our security analysts because it was the major tool that we were using and the one we utilized most."

"I recommend this solution to others because it is easy to manage, reliable, and overall good to use."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The most valuable features are patch management, software installation, and asset management."

"I would recommend this solution to others."

"BigFix's patch management automation feature is impressive."

"We rely on BigFix as part of our consulting engagements. It's more efficient from a visibility and discovery standpoint on the initial phase, the consulting engagement. It also increases our efficiencies on the remediation phase of our engagements."

"The use of fast query has been extremely valuable providing insight in real time of the endpoints."

"My company provides support services to a lot of customers and companies. We have reduced a huge amount of man-effort. Along with the man-effort, we have reduced the timeline to fix the compliance and security gaps. We have an unbroken record. The documentation clearly says that we have done the patching of newly released patches, including Microsoft and third-party patches, in up to 80% of the computers, within 72 hours of the release of the production. That was a very massive benefit that we have seen. When I talk about the 80% endpoints, it is 100 or 200. I am talking about 25,000 endpoints."

"BigFix allows us to see the data and remediate those vulnerabilities quickly and easily."

"Having higher visibility on patching level, on patching successful, and non-successful has been a way that BigFix has improved my organization. Also, the ability to customize the content to do what we need it to do is very powerful and very flexible for us. Finally, in the area of custom interfaces like REST API really gives us the ability to provide for our external customers."

More BigFix pros

"My advice about this product is that it is a very good solution and offers a stable and trusted software that runs smoothly and is easy to deploy."

"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."

"I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution."

"The traffic security monitoring, traffic application access feature called the agent, the main feature which is the endpoint security feature are the ones I found valuable. And it also had the in branch security in kind of SD WAN, good three hundred and sixty protection. It is specific and there is ease of deployment also present."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it is a low profile environment as far as overhead on the machines."

"I rate the initial setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."

"It is excellent endpoint protection for mobiles that does everything it says it will."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"The main issue I could point out is the offline agents and the way that it is missing."

"The encryption is not up to the mark."

"Cortex XDR is trickier to configure than other Palo Alto products. This is one area where we are not so satisfied."

"For Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, if I had to point out improvements, I would say the UI is still somewhat difficult for beginners."

"There are some false positives. What our guys would have liked is that it would have been easier to manipulate as soon as they found a false positive that they knew was a false positive. How to do so was not obvious. Some people complained about it. The interface, the ESM, is not user-friendly."

"The solution lacks real-time, on-demand antivirus."

"The GUI could be improved."

"Basically, they don't provide customer support tools just to investigate the logs."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"We are looking for better images for third-party operations like article databases, for example, other article application servers, and the SAP applications."

"The product should become cloud-based. Also, the peer nesting ability of the product is a little backward."

"Their technical support needs some improvement. We have had some cases where we didn't get enough support from the support team but I think it's improving now."

"It can be improved speed-wise. They can make it a little bit light. If you do any query for servers in bulk, it can take some time. Similarly, creating a job can take some time."

"Maybe they could introduce a preview of what is going to happen next, because generally what the project is doing is just asking you to execute some actions."

"We would like to see a different license plan, e.g. to include features from lifecycle with Patch Management, as an example."

"One aspect that could be improved is the speed of the console. Sometimes it can be slow, which is something that needs to be addressed."

"I would request them to build a robots, or an easier way for integration with the other tools, like ITSM tools."

More BigFix cons

"Technical support is not the best. It's hard to get a hold of them if we need help. It's something that definitely needs improvement."

"Since they're dealing with multi-core environments now, the best option would be for them to enhance the product so that the product can automatically do an assessment on the machine."

"This product has room for improvement to display a more detailed representation of the problem when a virus is or isn't stopped."

"I did notice that my OS slowed down, but I don't know if that's due to Webroot."

"The console spins up relatively slowly, and some of the configuration items are obscure (e.g., reporting back one time per day is a default setting) and need to be tweaked."

"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."

"Unified threat management (UTM) integration."

"The platform is mostly stable, however there are hiccups with the cloud from time-to-time that impact the ability to get to the portal."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"In terms of the cost Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very expensive because we are a Mexican company and when you translate dollars to pesos the cost is very high. The solution is very expensive for Mexican companies. I understand that they have international prices, but I do not think it offsets the price enough for many companies in countries, such as Mexico. The amount it is reduced is not a massive percentage."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"The tool's price is moderate."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"Very costly product."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The price of BigFix could be lower. However, I am always seeking a lower price."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing one out of ten."

"Its price is very reasonable."

"It might be about $23 a client."

"So, the pricing is slightly more expensive than the others. I have to keep buying licenses every time I add a new device."

"You are charged per server and per workstation when using BigFix. ManageEngine is a lot cheaper than BigFix. There are some additional costs, such as support."

"I would stay with the Managed Virtual Server license model, which is a 1-to-1 license per OS whether it is virtual or physical."

"We have a subscription-based contract with BigFix."

More BigFix pricing and cost advice

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is not too expensive. My licenses cost me between $300 and $400. It is really good price wise."

"If you purchase for clients, then you are the managing billing entity. It's better to either get a monthly subscription check from your clients, or to prepay for the year (so as to not keep cash in reserve to pay the bill each month) IMHO."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"From a pricing standpoint, I would rate it a four out of five."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	68

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BigFix?

I rate the price for BigFix as medium, neither low nor high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BigFix?

There is one feature in BigFix called the automation patch policy that requires enhancement. When an action is initia...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BigFix?

My current use case involves being one of the products and one of the clients implementing this tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two ou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's adverti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the con...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Tanium vs BigFix

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs BigFix

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs BigFix

Compared 4% of the time

HashiCorp Terraform vs BigFix

Compared 3% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs BigFix

Compared 2% of the time

More BigFix Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 47% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Cynet vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

August 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

BigFix

August 2026

Download BigFix product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

July 2026

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Tivoli Endpoint Manager

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Palo Alto Networks

HCLSoftware

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

OVERVIEW:

HCL BigFix is a Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) and automation platform that delivers secure, resilient operations by reducing risk, cost, and operational complexity across on-premises, hybrid, and multi-cloud environments through a centralized control plane.

Built on a single-agent, multi-platform architecture, HCL BigFix unifies infrastructure security, endpoint management, remediation, and digital employee experience automation within a single platform, enabling IT Operations and Security teams to manage more than 155 million endpoints. As AI-driven vulnerability discovery accelerates through frontier models such as Mythos, HCL BigFix helps organizations reduce exposure with near real-time remediation, automated compliance enforcement, and continuous risk reduction. It integrates with leading vulnerability management solutions, including Tenable, Qualys, and Rapid7, and leverages 600,000+ out-of-the-box remediation Fixlets, 50,000+ compliance checks, and a proven >98% first-pass patch success rate to help organizations close the gap between vulnerability detection and remediation.

What are BigFix's key features?

Automated Patch & Vulnerability Remediation: Automates patch deployment and vulnerability remediation across workstations, servers, virtual machines, and cloud workloads using 600,000+ out-of-the-box remediation Fixlets.

Compliance Enforcement: Supports continuous compliance through 50,000+ compliance checks, automated policy enforcement, and prebuilt remediation content.

Enterprise Scalability: Manages and secures more than 155 million endpoints across over 120 operating system variants.

Centralized Endpoint Management: Delivers unified visibility and control across distributed environments through a resilient single-agent architecture.

Digital Employee Experience: Powered by AEX, HCL BigFix's agentic AI platform, enabling proactive monitoring, self-healing workflows, intelligent automation, and natural-language interaction.

What are potential benefits and ROI factors?

Reduced Cyber Risk: Near real-time remediation shortens exposure windows as AI-driven vulnerability discovery compresses exploitation timelines.

Lower Operational Costs: Consolidates endpoint management, security, and automation into a single platform, reducing tool sprawl and administrative overhead.

Operational Resilience: Maintains continuous compliance and policy enforcement across distributed environments.

Improved IT Efficiency: Automates routine endpoint operations and vulnerability remediation, reducing manual effort and accelerating response times.

Higher End-User Productivity: Resolves endpoint issues proactively to minimize disruption and improve employee experience.

Organizations across government, financial services, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, and other regulated industries use BigFix for endpoint management, patching, compliance, software distribution, and vulnerability remediation. Support for standards including SCAP 1.3 and NIAP makes BigFix well suited for highly regulated and public-sector environments.

HCLSoftware

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

US Foods, Penn State, St Vincent's Health US Foods, Sabadell Bank, SunTrust, Australia Sydney, Stemac, Capgemini, WNS Global Services, Jebsen & Jessen, CenterBeam, Strauss, Christian Hospital Centre, Brit Insurance, Career Education Corporation

Mytech Partners

Buyer's Guide

BigFix vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

June 2026

Free Report: BigFix vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about BigFix vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BigFix vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.