Splunk Enterprise Security Reviews

We mainly use the solution as a reseller. We give our users the latest version of the product. 

The solution is the market leader.

Our customers are always looking to partner with market leaders as you can't go wrong with them.

Customers can monitor cloud environments. 

The threat detection capabilities are quite fast and efficient based on my customer's feedback. 

We've used the MITRE ATT&CK feature and it's good. It's pretty standard and comparable to IBM. Most products offer this as well. 

It's good for analyzing malicious activities. It's good as an overall platform. It's good at detecting threats. It's a basic feature that is quite effective.

Splunk can help to reduce alert volume if you configure it properly.

They are a market leader in a lot of areas in terms of features and functions. 

It helped us speed up security investigations. I'm not sure of the exact percentage it helped us speed up by, however.

It has a lot of basic and standard features. 

It is a full-fledged solution that provides everything a company needs.

When it comes to malicious activities, however, it's rather overpriced. There are cheaper ways to detect.

There are quite a lot of security platforms on the market that do the same thing in a similar way at a cheaper rate. 

The pricing could be a lot lower. I'm from Asia, and they need to provide Asian pricing. They should price better for the region they are in. Once companies see the price, it puts them off. 

The integration could be a bit better. They charge for certain integrations. 

I've used the solution for about a year or more. 

It is a stable product.

The solution is used across multiple departments, not locations. That said, it would support multiple locations. 

We've had no issues with scalability. We usually have a solution that lasts three to five years and have had no issues scaling in that time.

I do not directly deal with technical support. 

We previously used many solutions, such as IBM. The implementation times are about the same. There are some ways that IBM is faster and other ways Splunk is faster. However, Splunk offers a more modern look.

The initial setup is very easy. It's quite straightforward. The process is similar to IBM. The deployment takes less than one day. It is done by a different team. I don't handle the initial implementation process.

The maintenance needed is very minimal. We have at least ten people that can handle deployment and maintenance. 

The solution is quite expensive compared to the competition. It's considered a premiere security option. 

We also looked at Dynatrace before choosing Splunk. 

I'm a registered partner of Splunk. 

We are using the latest version of the solution. 

We haven't used the threat intelligence management feature. We usually use another product.

The mission control feature hasn't been used. I'm not familiar with it.

For those looking for a cheaper product, I'd suggest, if they had a limited budget, to go cheaper. Likely a cheaper option that can do the same work as Splunk. At the end of the day, whether you choose a Toyota or a Rolls Royce, you get from A to B the same. The price is the differentiation. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's a good product overall. 

Our primary use case is for security audit log collection correlation. We wanted something that the security team could focus on versus going directly into our enterprise. We had some initial use cases to supplement our IT ops security into one product. We had a SIEM but not one that was as customizable as Splunk Enterprise Security.

The out-of-the-box capabilities that Enterprise Security offers were very helpful. We're not using it anymore because it was almost overkill. We have shifted to go back to just the core functionality. We were inundated with the amount of alerts and alarms that we could get out of it. It is also a resource hog and we didn't have the resources to support it on-prem so we're taking it offline now.

We saw the granularity that we could get from Splunk far exceeded what we already had. We had the ability to have our security team really focus on the platform and stay within the platform, but they could correlate with a variety of other stakeholders, and our stakeholders were growing. So we tried to get ahead of that and filter it in to create customizable KPIs for those user groups versus having a one-size-fits-all approach. That unique was very helpful for us to expand upon. The driving force is resources, and we were lacking those.

We use it to monitor multiple clouds. We weren't leveraging it for all of our clouds, but we have a presence in GCP, AWS, and Azure. The unity and uniformity across all of it would have been great but at that stage, we were only using it for on-prem coverage. We would like to go ahead and understand how we can implement it as a cloud solution as we are increasing our daily footprint too. We weren't really prepared to understand the workflows we already had in the CSPs or the new integrations of data lakes at a warehouse that were and are still being built out to get Enterprise Security to function off of that too. We hadn't gotten to that stage.

A lot of what we were doing was done manually in terms of vulnerability and remediation and is still being done manually now. Evolving to a stage where the alerts weren't inundating our customers and getting familiar with the product would have helped us perhaps get a bit more functionality and usability out of it. We are seeing some value out of Enterprise Security and think we can get similar results elsewhere. I think that down the road, as our understanding gets better of how we want framework requirements, Enterprise Security could come back into the picture.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for around twelve months.

Stability had its drawbacks because of how much it consumes. We had to justify whether or not it was worth keeping it up. The decision was to not keep up with it.

We are only on-prem so we do manual scaling. We don't have the elasticity that we would have in the cloud which limited us. Justifiably, in order to scale up the platform, we would have to go through procurements and more hardware, which was not an option. So we were limited, and we knew that. We had done pilots and buildout but a hardware refresh cycle was coming up, we had to justify whether or not it was in the cards.

I've been working with Splunk for several years now, and I've always found them very responsive and supportive in a variety of technologies around core functionality like Enterprise Security and ITSI. 

I would rate them an eight out of ten. They have a strong team through and through from the pre-presales all the way through architectural changes and shifts that we need to do to address the customer.

Positive

We've had numerous implementations of SIEM solutions over the years. Splunk offered a lot of capabilities on top of some of our old antiquated Sentinel and Azure. We had many other products before we pursued Enterprise Security. But we weren't in a position to really go down the Enterprise Security route because we hadn't quite fleshed out what our end goal was.

We're still in the evaluation stages. Looking at Enterprise Security, given the fact that we already have an investment in Splunk, it makes sense. We would like to see it grow beyond just Enterprise Security to more of not just observability, but pro actions to utilize the source of that nature. 

We had great success potentially going into a SOAR from Enterprise Security. We hadn't quite evolved to that point yet. At this stage, it's just not really in our pipeline to pursue Enterprise Security until we get a better understanding of our requirements.

Refining those playbooks and so forth also is going to take time. We have customers who have categorically unique requirements. From a security standpoint, one group's security requirements are going to be different from some of the other teams that we have. We are trying to find that uniformity across the board. We may have to entertain multiple security solutions to meet their needs.

My role was to support a lot of the backend and the configuration of the platform as it was being established.

The level of difficulty was on par with the Splunk Enterprise core. My team was involved with a lot of the provisioning from the virtual environment and on-prem to support it. It wasn't overly complicated. Once it was up it took a lot of resources. Evaluating and seeing whether or not we could actually move it to the cloud when the core functionality still existed on-prem, we weren't willing to split them at this stage.

We would almost always have Splunk support through the deployment and configuration stages of it. It was always solid. Once we had the platform up and running, we had to consider general operations and maintenance. While the Splunk team was great and the resources are available, there is a finite amount of resources on-site.

Splunk is not cheap. That's definitely a consideration as we look at other products.

We haven't seen much time to value using the solution system but it wasn't necessarily a fault of the product. It was the cycles to maintain it and support it, to make sure it's growing correctly. We hadn't gotten to that stage. Our ROI and TCO, given the fact that its footprint is being looked at because of what it takes to maintain it in terms of resources. We have the core platform, and then we have a growing license. We're looking at how we can efficiently use Enterprise Security. It's just not there at this point.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten. I think the rating has the potential to be higher. If we had time to flesh it out and vet some of the core capabilities of Enterprise Security and how it could benefit us over the core. Getting to that stage requires a lot more customer engagement on our side that we weren't really prepared to do because of budgetary constraints, hardware refresh cycles, and so forth. Overall, we dropped the product not necessarily because of a lack of capability, it was more along the lines that the timing wasn't appropriate for our security teams.

The biggest value I get from attending a Splunk conference is knowledge transfer. I work in the public so it's valuable having a lot of conversations with fellow colleagues who are in the public sector and hearing their hurdles. We don't want to reinvent the wheel every time, and we don't want to hit obstacles that could have been lessons learned. The conference is a really good opportunity to see what's new, what's out there, and how it can blend in with our current architecture and designs. It also helps to understand what's not going to work to be able to get ahead of it before questions come up. We can properly equip our customers and answer their questions. The Splunk conference is a good brain dump.

We use it to provide both operational and security dashboards based on our clients' equipment. We use it for infra monitoring and threat analysis.

We have multiple rules for analyzing malicious activities and detecting breaches. We get the notable events from the logs and from there we drill down into the cause. We correlate that with the framework and get a score. Based on that, we proceed to the investigation.

It gives us a complete correlation between data processes and security threats. It has threat analysis and the MITRE ATT&CK framework. From a SOC perspective, it uses multiple components or frameworks and, in that way, is very useful, providing us with a lot of information for our clients. They don't want multiple teams dealing with security and malware, et cetera. Splunk Enterprise Security gives us everything in one place.

We get all the real-time logs and, based on the configuration, it's pretty easy to use to find threats. It has helped to speed up our security investigations. Before we went with Splunk Enterprise Security we had limited information but now we have threat intelligence to enhance things.

We are now handling multiple customers globally. We are able to build custom rules based on customer requirements and the applications and data they are using. It is enhancing the security of each customer's infrastructure. We are able to provide weekly and monthly reports and, based on that, our customers are honing their firewalls and other security infrastructure. Splunk Enterprise Security is very helpful in improving the security of our clients.

It gives us good visibility into multiple environments, including cloud, on-premises, and hybrid; irrespective of platform.

The UI is also very friendly. You don't have to work very hard to find things.

One issue is that we are getting a lot of false positives. We are trying to reduce them by customizing the default rules, changing thresholds, and using white-listing and black-listing. It's getting better and better as a result. But they need to build components that would reduce the false positives. 

Also, we have a lot of security feed providers. If there was some kind of management tool for that, it would be a great tool to have.

I have been working with Splunk for about four and a half years.

I started working with Splunk Enterprise Security at version 6 and now we are up to 9 and it needs more resources. But it's okay because we have a lot of functionality now. It's better than it was earlier. I would rate the stability at nine out of 10.

Splunk on the cloud is scalable, a 10 out of 10.

If someone is doing the deployment for the first time, it will be a little complex. The installation is straightforward, but for the configuration, you need to follow the documentation and understand it. That is a little difficult the first time if you are doing it on your own. If you have anyone with experience who can explain the configuration, the second time it will be straightforward.

The solution requires maintenance but not much, mostly when there are upgrades 

Most of the companies we work with are keen on budgeting. They can't spend much on security. Their problem is with the cost. They would like to have it but the problem is the budget. If they got a taste of Splunk Enterprise Security and its benefits, they might be able to cope better. A 15-day trial doesn't give them much hands-on or benefit from the tool. From a security perspective, they would need to have it for six months or a year to get a sense of it.

We try to explain, to someone who is concerned about the cost, the functionality and how powerful the application is. Security people know it's better to have a better solution, but management has to look at the budget.

We tried some other solutions, but they didn't work like Splunk. We found that Splunk is the best one.

We work on multiple cloud environments including AWS, Azure, GCP, and most of the popular clouds. We have built our own combined app to monitor most of the cloud service providers. We have our own solution for cloud security monitoring.

My advice is that for big firms, because it has better detection and security, Splunk Enterprise Security is a very good tool. For big companies, good security is important, especially if they have a global market.

I don't see any other software having as much functionality and different ways to investigate security.

Our technical teams are demoing various enterprise tools to develop experience and knowledge so we can better serve our clients. In addition to Splunk, we are evaluating IBM QRadar and one other solution. One of our customers is asking about the Splunk MSP model.

Splunk allows us to customize processing and dashboards, which helps us take care of our customers' needs. Splunk is costly, but it's better than other products. It speeds up security investigations. It helps us detect threats faster. Everything is faster. The only part that's lagging is the management. Otherwise, Splunk is good. It took about a month to realize the solution's benefits. 

We get few alerts except for the other solutions we have integrated with Splunk. We'll monitor those alerts and support their customers, but we don't have any other mechanisms for databases or something outside of the infrastructure. 

Splunk enables us to customize dashboards and queries, and we can add multiple admin users. We only use the essential parts, including the MITRE ATT&CK framework capabilities. Organizations share threat information under the MITRE ATT&CK framework. We do threat hunting and marketing based on that.

We do manual threat hunting. We get all the IP addresses and check the threat databases to determine if it's malicious. 

The algorithms and alerts could be improved. I would also like to pre-build use cases. We need to create the algorithm based on our use cases. 

The threat management part is still lagging. There are some gaps in threat management. Other vendors have built-in threat management systems, but Splunk lacks the threat management component in its portal. The UEBA and everything else is perfect, but it lacks a unified threat intelligence and management feature. 

We've also had problems integrating the solution. We get multiple errors, like search log errors, UI errors, etc., and performance issues. It's fine with basic content, but if we're dealing with multiple data sources and 30 GB of data, it cannot handle the load. Our customer is indexing around 10 GB of data daily, and I can't search the log without getting errors. 

Splunk Enterprise is stable. 

Splunk Enterprise is highly scalable. 

We haven't had to contact Splunk support because we can find all the answers we need online. 

We also use IBM QRadar.

Deploying Splunk is straightforward. We had no issues. 

Splunk is more expensive than most solutions, but it offers lots of value. If a customer wants the cheapest solution, we'll use that.

I rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten. I would give it a ten if it had built-in threat management. 

Splunk helps us to be proactive and it integrates with many devices. It offers visibility from many different levels, areas, zones, and devices rather than from a single system. We can use this intelligence to create correlations, system solutions, etc. Splunk reduces the risk factors and helps us in many ways beyond just collecting logs. Though Splunk is costly, it has many features like threat intelligence which is very useful. It helps us be proactive about reducing risks.

Splunk incorporates a lot of elements that help to reduce security risks. For it to reach certain compliance, we need to have some security insight. Splunk is a very good SIEM, it’s a top solution, but the best feature is its cost of visibility. We have all the most important features to detect vulnerabilities or risks.

Customers cannot manage or maintain the servers on the cloud since they are all deployed. Since there are platforms, they can become a little bit hectic. One of my other observations is that the applications that are available on the store are not updated as much as those available on on-prem.

Moreover, I have had issues with the Splunk store. I believe that the developers in the Splunk store are external and I can see that the level of maturity of these developers ranges between low and medium. I have never seen the maturity go up higher. The applications are not maintained regularly and it can cause issues in the visibility dashboard. I would suggest to Splunk's tech team to keep the store private, so that Splunk creates its own applications without the interference of external developers.

I have concerns about the architecture as well since I can see it is not very well defined. However, this is not the case with on-prem. We were able to manage and do whatever we wanted on the server level without opening a case or anything else. Moreover, the applications are updated every six months.

Splunk is a stable solution.

Splunk is a scalable solution. I am also impressed with the integrity of the solution. It is very good at collecting logs.

To resolve issues in the Splunk platform, you need to wait in a queue and then open a ticket with the support team. I find it a bit time-consuming since it takes time to call tech support and get what you need.

I have used Wazuh. From my point of view, Wazuh is a simple and basic SIEM solution compared to Splunk in terms of features. I don’t see Wazuh as a competitor to Splunk. Wazuh relies greatly on human tactics. It is best suited for cloud environments and maybe smaller ones. I have issues with Wazuh’s stability as well because I have found scenarios where it was working for one instance and not for another. These issues might be because it is open-source.

Wazuh is not actively working on their platform. I opine that they need to integrate many components and have many aspects automated so that the solution does not depend on its users. I have found issues with the language of Wazuh as well. It requires a lot of resources and time to learn the language. These issues make me think that Splunk is better than Wazuh.

The initial setup process for Splunk was simple. The language used in Splunk is very easy to pick up and you can rely on any person using it to be able to learn it quickly. The language and picking up logs are easier with Splunk.

I implemented Splunk through a POC.

Splunk is costly but it’s worth it due to the high-end features.

I have worked with Wazuh and ManageEngine Endpoint Central.

I would rate Splunk Cloud a 6.5 out of 10, but plugged on time, I would give it 8.8 out of 10. The maintenance of Splunk is a bit difficult due to the time-consuming tech support.

I would recommend Splunk. I cannot compare Splunk with any other SIEM solution because I have worked with many different solutions and logarithms, like the ManageEngine Endpoint Central, and Wazuh. I have used Splunk for two years and I can see Splunk as really the best SIEM solution that can be used for work. I totally recommend it even though I gave some negative feedback, it's because I am coming from a product perspective. We have to also take into consideration the security perspective. I am not talking about only visibility in which they should take a lot of care, but the way the solution is handling and even manipulating the data. This is the most valuable thing.

We employed Splunk Enterprise Security for one of our projects. Integrating it into our environment involved opening network ports and making necessary connections.

We had the opportunity to assess visibility in various environments, including on-premises. On-premises visibility has proven to be both satisfactory and advantageous.

We use the threat intelligence management feature. 

We have been considering implementing certain frameworks, such as MITRE ATT&CK or threat topology features.

It contributes value by enhancing resilience, crucial for adopting a Security Information and Event Management solution. Site resilience is imperative for our organization, meeting a key security requirement.

I have been working with it for three years.

It provides good scalability capabilities.

The technical support is among the best in the market. While we didn't have extensive interactions with the support team, we are satisfied with it. It offers support services locally in my country. I would rate it ten out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup was straightforward.

The integration and initial setup of Splunk were managed with the assistance of local support.

Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

The features are fine; they aren't exceptional in any way.

We are using Microsoft 365 and we're using the Exchange Mail Service. It's good for monitoring that in particular. 

The visibility we get has been good. 

Inside threat detection capabilities are good. 

It's helped us to reduce our alert volume a little. I haven't properly calculated it fully so it's hard to lay out a percentage. 

We'd like to have customer service in Hong Kong. I tend to wait a while for their response. We'd like to have more best-practice rules and instructions on how to create a dashboard.

I've only been using Splunk for two years. I make use of it to incorporate other solutions. I need to spend more time mastering Splunk. Sometimes it's a little bit difficult to use. I'd like to get more certificates, et cetera, and have spoken to their main office about that. It's got a high learning curve.

It hasn't helped us speed up security investigations. 

I've been using the solution for about two years. 

I've never had any issues with Splunk's stability.

The solution does not lack scalability. 

I haven't had any communication with Splunk's technical team.

I did not previously use a different solution. 

The setup time is quite long. To this point, I haven't deployed it to all servers and devices. I'm still in the process of deploying. 

I have not evaluated other options. 

We are Splunk customers. 

We do not use it in multiple environments. We just use it on-premises. 

I'm not yet using the threat intelligence features. 

We do not use the mission control feature. 

I have not created any customized dashboards as of now. At some point, I will create one for, for example, Windows Security.

I'm still in the process of mastering threat detection and XDR. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I haven't used it for such a long time, so it's hard to give comprehensive details about the solution. 

I used Splunk ES when I worked for a retail company. I worked mainly in the security operations center. I have also worked in healthcare and federal spaces.

Splunk ES provided the organization with overall visibility.

Incident Review and correlation search are valuable features. These features help us create correlations and have good actions afterward. The product provides visibility and enables us to correlate data and generate alerts.

The product could be cheaper.

I have been using the solution since 2014.

The tool is very stable. Once we set it up properly, it's reliable.

The solution's scalability is good. When we started, we had two servers and two indexers. By the time I left, it was up to 11 or more. It's not very hard to add additional components.

The support team is usually very receptive and answers quickly.

Positive

The initial setup was easy because I had done it many times before.

I used the solution until December last year. It was not very hard to monitor multiple cloud environments using the product because getting data into Splunk is not very hard. It also provides add-ons that we can use to pull data from other places.

Splunk was the brain of the whole process in our organization's security operations center. Without Splunk, we wouldn't have had any way of seeing what was going on. The tool helped reduce our mean time to resolve. We got alerts faster and responded to them faster.

The biggest value of the conference is the community. The conferences help me interact with people, get insights and up-to-date information, and also get opportunities to present my work. There's always room for change.

Overall, I rate the tool a nine out of ten.