Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
SUSE NeuVector Logo

SUSE NeuVector Reviews

Vendor: SUSE
3.9 out of 5

What is SUSE NeuVector?

Featured SUSE NeuVector reviews

SUSE NeuVector mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of SUSE NeuVector in the Container Security category stands at 2.3%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SUSE NeuVector2.3%
Wiz17.4%
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks11.5%
Other68.8%
Container Security
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Insurance Company
5%
University
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Transportation Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Retailer
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Media Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Construction Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%

Compare SUSE NeuVector with alternative products

Learn more about SUSE NeuVector

SUSE NeuVector customers

Related questions

 
SUSE NeuVector Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Managing Director at ProQuanta4.0We primarily use SUSE NeuVector for policy management and vulnerability scanning in containers. Its valuable automation features enhance learning information, but it needs improved monitoring, reporting, and cloud integration. Overall, it's a cost-effective solution offering good value for certain industries.
Head of Systems and infrastructure at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees3.5I use SUSE NeuVector for container security and Kubernetes integration, noting its informative UI and CI/CD pipeline support. However, setup is complex and requires better documentation. Other solutions are similar, but NeuVector is more challenging to implement.
DevOps Engineer at MTS4.0I explored NeuVector for container security, appreciating its features for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities. However, improvements are needed in importing CVEs and using cluster IPs for federation between clusters compared to Prisma Cloud.
Managing Director at ProQuanta4.0I primarily use SUSE NeuVector for asset protection on container workloads, deploying it on-premise and in the cloud, usually with Amazon AWS. Its performance, deployment, and cost are valuable, but increased visibility in the DevSecOps pipeline would be beneficial.
Expert Customer Solutions Designer at T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s.4.5I found SUSE NeuVector easy to deploy and appreciate its robust risk capabilities. However, it could benefit from smoother integration with other security tools in hybrid environments. Overall, its strengths are evident, but there's room for improvement.
Platform Solution Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees4.0No summary available
IT Specialist at Sangfor Technologies2.5I used SUSE NeuVector to monitor long-time events, finding its image scanning and anti-malware features particularly valuable, though the image-scanning capabilities could be improved. I deployed it with Alibaba but haven't considered any alternate solutions.
CTO at Diverto5.0We use SUSE NeuVector as a container security solution. The most valuable feature is its run-time security. However, it could benefit from more security protection rules and improved container image scanning to enhance its effectiveness.