Qualys VMDR vs SUSE NeuVector comparison

Qualys and SUSE are both solutions in the Container Security category. Qualys is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while SUSE is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. Qualys holds a 2.5% mindshare in Container Security, compared to SUSE’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Qualys users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SUSE users who would recommend it.

Qualys VMDR

Read 93 Qualys VMDR reviews

2,777 Views
2,193 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

SUSE NeuVector

Read 8 SUSE NeuVector reviews

3,031 Views
2,283 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Qualys VMDR

SUSE NeuVector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Qualys VMDR and SUSE NeuVector compete in the cloud security and vulnerability management category. Qualys VMDR appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and cloud-based architecture that enhance functionality and scalability.

Features: Qualys VMDR offers advanced vulnerability detection, continuous monitoring, and detailed reporting capabilities that suit diverse environments. Additionally, it supports asset tagging and compliance management, helping organizations maintain security policies. SUSE NeuVector provides run-time security and container image scanning, with strengths in anti-malware and network vulnerability scanning, though it may face challenges in certain integrations.

Room for Improvement: Qualys VMDR could benefit from addressing false positives, enhancing API speed, and improving integration capabilities. It also requires more customization options for reporting and dashboards. SUSE NeuVector needs development in its monitoring and reporting functions and should enhance its container scanning features to strengthen security protection rules.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qualys VMDR supports public, private, and hybrid clouds, offering flexible deployment options but may experience inconsistent technical support responsiveness. SUSE NeuVector is easy to set up for public and on-premises deployments, with recognized superior customer service in terms of responsiveness compared to Qualys VMDR.

Pricing and ROI: Qualys VMDR is perceived as more expensive, often due to bundled licensing, but justified by its security advantages and extensive features. It offers a significant ROI by lowering security risks and operational costs. SUSE NeuVector, being open-source, provides a cost-effective pricing model focused on support, offering lower upfront costs and threat detection efficiency, yielding a good return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Qualys VMDR vs. SUSE NeuVector Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qualys VMDR vs. SUSE NeuVector

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,823 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualys VMDR

Ranking in Container Security

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (5th), Vulnerability Management (2nd), Configuration Management Databases (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (2nd)

SUSE NeuVector

Ranking in Container Security

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of Qualys VMDR is 2.5%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SUSE NeuVector is 2.6%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Harold Jensen

Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at 3M Health Information Systems

Good visibility but expensive and needs better support

Support: It's often overseas and often following a script, basically asking us to redo what we opened the case with. Multiple APIs: There seems to be a lack of easy onboarding into Qualys. We had to use manual inputs and some API calls to get items in place. Dashboard: It is very rudimentary with very little customization. The Qualys Scripting Language (QSL) works differently in different Qualys modules, so when you get it working in one area you have to modify the syntax in others. User account management: We often have to give users more rights than needed just to give them what they need. Integration with the various Qualys Modules: You can tell the UI is different based on of the different teams that created them. QSL syntax same in all modules Responsiveness of some of the components: They time out, you get a blank screen, etc. Backend updates between the various modules: You update connectors and information takes a few minutes to show in VMDR or Global Asset View Connectors: Connectors have a throttling issue with AWS which causes them to frequently fail unless you manually run them again.

Read full review

Danie Joubert

Managing Director at ProQuanta

Good value for money; great for policy management

Our model of deployment for this solution is on-premises. For people looking into this solution and trying to use it for the first time, I'd say make your life easier by using the SUSE product as well on top of your community scale stack. That makes your integration points a lot easier and smoother. I would also say during your initial setup, make sure that your clusters are already in terms of the capabilities with the version required. I would rate this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. The reason for this rating is that what they offer is solid, but they could expand their service and add more features just to make more things integrated into an enterprise itself.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's patch management is excellent for keeping our critical servers and third-party applications updated efficiently."

"They also have threat detection which maps threats. There is a feed that comes from Qualys when a new vulnerability is found. It tells us which machines are infected with that vulnerability."

"The most valuable feature is the connection of threat intelligence information with identified vulnerabilities, which means you can prioritize vulnerabilities according to actual attacks."

"Qualys VM's best features are vulnerability management and customizable scoring."

"I find Qualys VM very robust, and it's very useful for vulnerability management and patch management. The value that it brings to my environment is economies of scale. There is no limitation on adding any endpoints. You go by the rule, and it's added once another endpoint is added to our environment. It's automatically installed, and it's less work from our end. It frees up my license automatically if I don't need an endpoint or if my machine is decommissioned. I like the dashboard displays because I don't see any duplication. The most important part is vulnerability management and prioritization. Unlike Symantec, it shows the kind of vulnerability I would want to patch first. It provides a holistic view of the kind of vulnerabilities and the ones I should remediate first. I don't have to do a scan; it just brings up those critical kinds of vulnerabilities like zero-day vulnerabilities and tells me to prioritize them. You have to prioritize these vulnerabilities first and go on with the rest. The dashboard shows me the ones that have been fixed, so I don't have to complete an aging report. The user experience and the graphical interface are good. As it's user-friendly and understandable on an executive level, it brings real value. We also use this solution because it's robust and flexibile."

"The most valuable features are vulnerability detection and the scanning capability to enable identification of vulnerabilities across our network."

"I value the scheduling of scans and reports as per the desired timeframes."

"The most valuable feature is the vulnerability assessment."

More Qualys VMDR pros

"The solution includes many features, not only for container and client security but also for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities."

"The UI has a lot of features."

"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."

"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."

"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."

"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."

"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."

"The solution includes many features, not only for container and client security but also for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities."

More SUSE NeuVector pros

Cons

"It would be nice to have an all-in-one solution that was automated and could handle the scanning and reports as well as the patching and updating."

"The reporting in this solution can be improved."

"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."

"What we have found is that the solution is not closely tied with the patch management. It is okay with newer ones, like Windows 10 machines; it gives the correct patch. But for Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008, it does not give us the correct patch so we have to manually identify the patches. This is a major problem."

"I would like to see more accuracy in detections, better reporting capabilities, and better dashboard download capabilities."

"Integration could be better. When you think about scanning, it's not used just with this product alone but with other Qualys products. If you think about the bundle, the product itself is good. But integration with other products and packages has space for improvement. They should also offer a better price for bundles."

"There are scenarios where a vulnerability is reported once yet not in subsequent scans, even if we have not fixed it."

"Qualys VMDR identifies vulnerabilities and suggests fixes. However, it does not automate patching unless the patch management module is purchased separately."

More Qualys VMDR cons

"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."

"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."

"The image-scanning features need improvement."

"The documentation needs to improve a bit."

"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."

"However, I found that the support in Egypt was not very qualified, and there was a need to upgrade to a higher support layer to solve my issues."

"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."

"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."

More SUSE NeuVector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is reasonably priced for the value it provides."

"It is more expensive than other products on the market."

"The pricing is very competitive."

"The product is more expensive than that of any other vendor."

"Qualys VM is better suited for medium to large companies because the price can be too much for smaller customers."

"There is a license for the use of this solution. We pay annually instead of monthly to receive a better discount on the price."

"Qualys is a pay-as-you-go model, so there's flexibility to the pricing."

"Qualys is cheaper and more affordable than other solutions."

More Qualys VMDR pricing and cost advice

"The price of SUSE NeuVector is low. There is an additional cost for support."

"SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"The solution's pricing could be better. The cost of a subscription is calculated on the basis of work."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

29%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Qualys VMDR?

I like that we have many scanners and channels that don't overload. It helps us scan and track easily. Also, the tagging system is good for tagging. We can still use QualysAgent task ID tools even ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys VMDR?

Qualys offers better pricing and is feature-packed compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys VMDR?

They can tweak their UI since the new version seems a bit jumbled up, and the old UI was more user-friendly.

See all answers

What do you like most about NeuVector?

The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NeuVector?

SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution. You have to pay for the support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NeuVector?

One area for improvement is NeuVector's ability to import CVEs from different sources. Additionally, using a node port instead of a cluster IP is less ideal when implementing federation features be...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tenable Nessus vs Qualys VMDR

Compared 13% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Qualys VMDR

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Qualys VMDR

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Qualys VMDR

Compared 6% of the time

Wiz vs Qualys VMDR

Compared 5% of the time

More Qualys VMDR Competitors

Trivy vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 14% of the time

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 12% of the time

Sysdig Falco vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 11% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 11% of the time

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs SUSE NeuVector

Compared 10% of the time

More SUSE NeuVector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualys VMDR

May 2025

Download Qualys VMDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Security

May 2025

Download SUSE NeuVector product report

Also Known As

Qualys VM, QualysGuard VM, Qualys Asset Inventory, Qualys Container Security

NeuVector

Overview

Vulnerability Management, Detection, and Response (VMDR) is a cornerstone product of the Qualys TruRisk Platform and a global leader in the enterprise-grade vulnerability management (VM) vendor space. With VMDR, enterprises are empowered with visibility and insight into cyber risk exposure - making it easy to prioritize vulnerabilities, assets, or groups of assets based on business risk. Security teams can take action to mitigate risk, helping the business measure their actual risk exposure over time.

Qualys VMDR offers an all-inclusive risk-based vulnerability management solution to prioritize vulnerabilities and assets based on risk and business criticality. VMDR seamlessly integrates with configuration management databases (CMDB), Qualys Patch Management, Custom Assessment and Remediation (CAR), Qualys TotalCloud and other Qualys and non-Qualys solutions to facilitate vulnerability detection and remediation across the entire enterprise.

With VMDR, users are empowered with actionable risk insights that translate vulnerabilities and exploits into optimized remediation actions based on business impact. Qualys customers can now aggregate and orchestrate data from the Qualys Threat Library, 25+ threat intelligence feeds, and third-party security and IT solutions, empowering organizations to measure, communicate, and eliminate risk across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments.

Qualys

SUSE NeuVector is a full lifecycle container security solution that helps your organization secure its container infrastructures, manage Kubernetes security risks, and block threats. The NeuVector continuous container security and compliance platform simplifies data protection from pipeline to production, enforces compliance, and provides complete visibility and automated controls for protection against known and unknown threats. In addition, NeuVector is the only Kubernetes-native container security solution that offers a comprehensive risk profile of known vulnerabilities and also delivers immediate protection from all vulnerabilities.

SUSE NeuVector Features

SUSE NueVector has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Container incident detection and prevention
Network security
Runtime security
Supply chain security
Container firewall
Host and platform security
Cloud-native automation and integration
Resource monitoring
Visualization and reporting
High availability
Security
Vulnerability management
Compliance and auditing
Alerting
Logging and Response

SUSE NeuVector Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing NeuVector. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Deep packet inspection (DPI): NeuVector applies DPI to identify attacks, detect sensitive data, or verify application access to further reduce the attack surface. Only network layer analysis enables security to detect and verify the allowed protocols, helping security teams enforce business policy.

Real-time protection: NeuVector provides inspection, segmentation, and protection of all traffic into and out of a container. This includes container to container traffic, and ingress from external sources to containers, as well as egress from containers to external applications and the internet. The solution aims to protect your applications from internal application level attacks such as DDoS and DNS.

Capture packets for debugging and threat investigation: WIth NeuVector, you can view summary connection data and drill down into actual packet details for each container, as they scale up and down. When a threat is detected, NeuVector is able to automatically capture and display the packet info, making it easy for you to investigate.

Automated security policies: The NeuVector solution allows you to automate the creation of security policies to protect application workloads in production. The solution also enables you to automate and maintain run-time security policies using Kubernetes custom resource definitions (CRDs), and gives you the option to declare an application security policy at any stage in the pipeline.

Compliance: NeuVector offers detection capabilities and security policy enforcement that prevent PHI and PII exposure, exceed requirements, and simplify reporting for PCI-DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, and more. The solution helps you track critical vulnerabilities and compliance violations so you can quickly identify any that require immediate patching or followup alerts. It also makes it possible for you to manage vulnerability and compliance scan results, with no required integration to external workflow tools.

Reviews from Real Users

A Platform Solution Architect at a tech services company says, “The solution is feature-rich, easy to set up, and has good support.”

SUSE

Sample Customers

Agrokor Group, American Specialty Health, American State Bank, Arval, Life:), Axway, Bank of the West, Blueport Commerce, BSkyB, Brinks, CaixaBank, Cartagena, Catholic Health System, CEC Bank, Cegedim, CIGNA, Clickability, Colby-Sawyer College, Commercial Bank of Dubai, University of Utah, eBay Inc., ING Singapore, National Theatre, OTP Bank, Sodexo, WebEx

Figo, Clear Review, Arvato Bertelsmann, Experian, Chime

Buyer's Guide

Qualys VMDR vs. SUSE NeuVector

April 2025

Free Report: Qualys VMDR vs. SUSE NeuVector

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys VMDR vs. SUSE NeuVector and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qualys VMDR vs. SUSE NeuVector report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.