Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
SUSE NeuVector Logo

SUSE NeuVector pros and cons

Vendor: SUSE
3.9 out of 5

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the category report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Initial setup of SUSE NeuVector is straightforward and simple.
SUSE NeuVector offers a competitive pricing advantage.
Risk management capabilities in SUSE NeuVector are impressive.
Image scanning and anti-malware features in SUSE NeuVector are highly valuable.
Run-time security is a valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector.

CONS

NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines, affecting IaaS VMS compatibility.
The documentation requires improvement.
Monitoring and reporting features need enhancement.
Integrations and visibility across the DevSecOps pipeline should be increased.
Container image scanning and security protection rules need enhancement.
 

SUSE NeuVector Pros review quotes

reviewer1621125 - PeerSpot reviewer
Platform Solution Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Jul 7, 2021
The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward.
Ryan Vassallo - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Systems and infrastructure at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees
Jan 26, 2023
The UI has a lot of features.
Danie Joubert - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at ProQuanta
Mar 22, 2023
When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly.
Find out what your peers are saying about SUSE, Aqua Security, Palo Alto Networks and others in Container Security. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Marek Uher - PeerSpot reviewer
Expert Customer Solutions Designer at T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s.
Oct 29, 2024
The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities.
Danie Joubert - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at ProQuanta
May 17, 2023
The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost.
WL
IT Specialist at Sangfor Technologies
Aug 11, 2023
The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable.
VK
CTO at Diverto
Dec 6, 2023
The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security.
AK
DevOps Engineer at MTS
Nov 11, 2024
The solution includes many features, not only for container and client security but also for scanning nodes, networks, and vulnerabilities.
 

SUSE NeuVector Cons review quotes

reviewer1621125 - PeerSpot reviewer
Platform Solution Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Jul 7, 2021
We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines.
Ryan Vassallo - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Systems and infrastructure at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees
Jan 26, 2023
The documentation needs to improve a bit.
Danie Joubert - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at ProQuanta
Mar 22, 2023
I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline.
Find out what your peers are saying about SUSE, Aqua Security, Palo Alto Networks and others in Container Security. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Marek Uher - PeerSpot reviewer
Expert Customer Solutions Designer at T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s.
Oct 29, 2024
The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment.
Danie Joubert - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at ProQuanta
May 17, 2023
SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful.
WL
IT Specialist at Sangfor Technologies
Aug 11, 2023
The image-scanning features need improvement.
VK
CTO at Diverto
Dec 6, 2023
SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning.
AK
DevOps Engineer at MTS
Nov 11, 2024
Using a node port instead of a cluster IP is less ideal when implementing federation features between two clusters and could be improved.