Trellix DLP Reviews

We are using Trellix DLP for endpoint detection and response, as well as for data loss prevention.

Trellix DLP offers many features, using EDR, EPP, disk encryption, and other features. It's a good feature as all these elements are in one product.

The bugs need improvement. While it's okay to have everything in one product, improving EDR and DLP separately could increase efficiency.

I have been using Trellix DLP for five months.

It's good since we don't have any problems with Trellix.

The technical support by Trellix is good. We use technical support, and it is fast.

Positive

I did not work with any other DLP solutions before Trellix.

When I joined the company, they were already using Trellix, so I am not involved in the deployments.

The pricing of Trellix is not expensive.

I can recommend Trellix DLP because all features in one product are good, and the price is also reasonable. 

I would rate it eight out of ten.

We use the solution to control the storage devices and the data transfer through the cloud.

The visibility is good. We can use it for our internal investigation.

Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature.

Trellix is incompatible with Linux, and its DLP part is incompatible with Mac. Sometimes, it does not work on Windows, either.

Depending on the solution, what we integrate more easily is a good thing that we can integrate. It isn't easy to integrate within solutions sometimes.

I have been using Trellix DLP for a couple of years.

Performance is good, but it needs to be better.

I rate the solution’s stability a six out of ten.

We have more than 2000 customers using this solution.

I rate the solution’s scalability a six out of ten.

Support is knowledgeable but could be fast.

The initial setup is easy and takes one to two hours to complete. First, we deploy the EBO; then, we deploy the policies.

Sometimes, we use third-party tools to deploy the solution.

The product has a yearly device-based licence. It is expensive and could be cheaper. You need to pay for support.

There are three engineers to look after the solution's maintenance. If they have Linux, Mac, or Dell, they can't use it. It's very difficult for them to use this solution.

Our organization uses other solutions instead of Trellix DLP because of compatible issues.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

We use the solution for data protection for the endpoint.

Trellix DLP has an agent that continuously scans the endpoint and sends the data to the portal. From there, it continuously leverages data from its threat intelligence.

The solution has a threatfeed, AI/ML analytics, and granular parts.

Virtualization is complex and requires proper training. However, once you get trained, it is a very good product.

I have been using Trellix DLP since September.

The tool is stable.

The solution scales well vertically and horizontally.

Customer support is good.

Positive

If you opt for the SaaS-based solution, deployment is straightforward. However, choosing the on-premise solution can be more challenging because you have to manage your own SQL database, and sometimes the data can get corrupted. Additionally, data communication can be complex, among other potential issues.

The agent can be deployed in a single day. However, if you have a very large environment, it takes about a week to identify the requirements and the data that needs protection. To improve the DLP, you will need to define multiple policies and keywords. 

Trellix DLP offers significant cost savings by safeguarding your data and ensuring it remains secure.

The pricing is not so complex.

The coverage of Linux OS is not extensive but performs very well on Windows. Similarly, the approach on macOS is also limited.

One person is enough for the solution's maintenance.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

It made our systems much more secure and it's always a relief knowing that Trellix has our back.

Trellix DLP Endpoint has been a trusted solution for data loss prevention since the start of cybersecurity. It prevents enterprises from installing external software and devices and can block specific network pathways.

The whole UI of the server console installed on the standalone computers is hefty. We use different SQL servers to make the server work. After the entire server installation, the agents' deployment is still significant work. Slightly simplifying all our consoles would be beneficial for everyone.

Our clients want a function to see what functions are blocked by the DLP server on their workstations. Also, the server requires a standalone PC on the premises. If Trellix tries to provide its cloud servers on a subscription basis, that would be very helpful and feasible for more enterprises. Small enterprises also need DLP for their work.

I have been using Trellix DLP Endpoint for one year.

The solution is stable and has a very solid groundwork for DLP. I rate its stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the solution's scalability a seven out of ten.

The initial setup is complex. The external installation of SQL servers is complicated. The. EPO servers are straightforward to install for users. Download the zip file, extract it, and set up the whole. You then have to create an SQL or some external links. Sometimes, the customer gets concerned about why they need to use external links to download and DLP servers.

The pricing depends on the number of users in a company. I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten, where one is high and ten is low.

I recommend Trellix DLP Endpoint for all companies, but the on-premises installation of the server can be challenging. The technicality of installing servers on-premises is complex. Installing the solution externally is a concern for the customer's security. Nonetheless, I have installed the server for businesses of all sizes, from 100 to 1,500 employees. It is a very flexible system. However, if we are trying to provide a cloud-based solution, Trellix DLP Endpoint can also be installed on-premises for businesses with 10 to 50 employees.

Overall, I rate it an eight out of ten.

The tool has prebuilt templates for data classification. It is easier for customers to get started. 

Trellix needs to improve customer support. 

I have been working with the solution for two and a half years. 

Trellix is stable for Windows but unstable for Mac OS. 

The solution is scalable. 

Trellix is easy to deploy. 

I rate the product an eight out of ten.