

Varonis Platform and Trellix DLP compete in the data security and management sector. Varonis appears to have the edge in comprehensive analytics and integration capabilities, while Trellix excels in its unified security approach and competitive pricing.
Features: Varonis Platform offers advanced analytics for monitoring data access without impacting performance, strong data access governance, and robust data classification capabilities. Trellix DLP provides a single console for managing endpoint, web, and network security, advanced reporting features, and integrated management of multiple product domains, ensuring powerful protection across various channels.
Room for Improvement: Varonis struggles with cloud integration, high data volume performance, and a complex interface. Enhancements in calculation speed and data loss prevention are needed. Trellix requires improved OS support, especially for Mac OS, better browser and Azure compatibility, and a more user-friendly interface with deeper data inspection options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Varonis offers flexible deployment options for on-premises and cloud, praised for its rapid and thorough customer service. Trellix supports hybrid deployments, but experiences some delays in resolution, although its technical support is readily accessible. Varonis tends to be rated higher for deployment adaptability and customer service quality.
Pricing and ROI: Varonis is considered expensive due to modular licensing and infrastructure needs, but its expansive features justify the investment for larger enterprises. Trellix offers competitive pricing suitable for various business sizes and is often praised for its affordability. Both solutions provide significant ROI through enhanced data security, but Trellix's cost-effectiveness is a notable advantage.
The benefits our customers see from using Trellix DLP include cost reduction, given its competitive pricing in India.
I definitely say that we have had time savings by using the DataVantage module and also time savings using the AD module when we are dealing with different incidents.
I have seen a return on investment mainly through time savings and improved security for sensitive data, making it a valuable investment.
We received prompt technical support and remote sessions when necessary.
Trellix's technical support deserves a perfect rating, and I would rate it ten out of ten compared to other solutions.
The support from both the vendor and Trellix is excellent.
The customer support is above par; it is what I think other organizations should look at to be comparable to.
They respond quickly to anything we need, which is not common among platforms.
I would rate the customer support for Varonis Platform at nine out of ten.
Trellix DLP is very scalable, especially with the cloud version as everything is managed in the cloud.
It's a bit of a fallback, and I know they are working on improving scalability.
I would rate the scalability of Trellix DLP between eight to nine out of ten.
Varonis Platform is highly rated for scalability.
Varonis's scalability as eight to eight point five out of ten.
With the move to cloud provisioning, that is not a big problem anymore due to scalability on Trellix's side.
The agents are the main issue as they can behave inconsistently across different versions of operating systems.
Product stability is not a major concern; I would rate it 99% stable.
Having someone within a region who understands the countries and how they approach data and information security is sometimes where the problem lies.
Improved compatibility with Mac OS is needed due to ineffective policy applications.
The product also faces challenges with high CPU and memory utilization, impacting endpoint performance.
Varonis requires more access permissions for its core functions compared to competitors, which can be a concern for companies about data safety.
A phishing email module would be great; I look forward to when that comes out.
Enhancing tighter integration with third-party solutions, such as SIEM or SOAR platforms, for smoother incident response workflows.
It used to be in the middle, tending towards the high end, especially in South Africa, where we need to convert from dollars to rands, making things very expensive quickly.
The solution is currently affordable and not considered expensive.
The pricing for Trellix DLP is good, and it always wins when compared to other solutions.
Varonis is known for its high licensing cost, which can include the cost of multiple servers required for its operations, called collectors.
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Varonis Platform has been good, with competitive costs.
Trellix products are manageable through a centralized control center, meeting requirements from frameworks like PCI DSS.
Additionally, it supports integration with third-party solutions and agents, providing a versatile and user-friendly management experience.
These features are very useful for protecting company confidential data from being copied to another remote location or other sites.
Varonis is excellent for scanning unstructured data sources like file shares, OneDrive, SharePoint, Azure Blob Storage, and S3s.
Varonis Platform is agent-based and AI-driven for detection and response, identifying data based on its content and context.
We have created automatic scripts in case there is a chance that it is a ransomware malicious actor, and it will automatically disable the user, log them out, and disable the actual workstation.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Varonis Platform | 6.5% |
| Trellix DLP | 3.5% |
| Other | 90.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Trellix DLP is the ultimate data loss prevention (DLP) solution, safeguarding organizations' sensitive data from unauthorized access, disclosure, or alteration. This robust system monitors and regulates data flows across networks, emails, and the web, identifying and shielding various data types such as financial, personal, intellectual property, and regulated data. Employing encryption, access control, DLP policies, and monitoring, it secures data both at rest and in transit, ensuring compliance with data security regulations and industry standards. With customizable deployment options, including on-premises, cloud-based, and hybrid, Trellix DLP offers comprehensive protection and rapid response to data loss incidents.
Varonis Platform enhances data security and governance with advanced analytics, identifying unusual access patterns and sensitive areas. Its centralized interface manages permissions across systems, offering essential capabilities for alerting and reporting.
Varonis Platform provides continuous data protection and monitoring by identifying and alerting on unauthorized data access. It offers comprehensive insights into file access and user activities, supporting data classification and simplifying compliance with tracking and monitoring capabilities. Integration with storage systems enables users to manage permissions and access effectively. Room for improvement includes cloud integration and simplifying its interface and calculation engine for ease of use. Challenges include on-premises dependency, licensing costs, and a need for enhanced DLP capabilities.
What are the primary features of Varonis Platform?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
In finance, Varonis aids in safeguarding sensitive financial data, while in healthcare, it secures patient records. Legal industries utilize it for protecting client information, and retail sectors manage sensitive customer data. These industries benefit from Varonis' ability to prevent unauthorized access and streamline compliance.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.