Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Varonis Platform based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Wiz, and Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Varonis Platform surpasses its competitors by offering advanced data protection and insider threat detection, providing unparalleled visibility into your data and reducing risk with automated threat response.
Varonis Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Varonis, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust endpoint security with exceptional threat analysis and minimal system impact. In comparison, Varonis Platform excels in data access governance, providing strong insights into data security. Each serves distinct security needs, making them valuable for different organizational priorities.
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Varonis Platform includes higher initial expenses, highlighting a noticeable cost difference between the two solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Varonis Platform includes higher initial expenses, highlighting a noticeable cost difference between the two solutions.
Wiz offers advanced risk evaluation, prioritization, and integration in cloud environments. In comparison, Varonis excels in data governance and access management with strong compliance controls. Tech buyers may choose Wiz for its cloud features or Varonis for its data-focused capabilities.
Wiz offers a minimal setup cost that appeals to startups, while Varonis Platform incurs a higher initial investment suitable for enterprises seeking comprehensive features.
Wiz offers a minimal setup cost that appeals to startups, while Varonis Platform incurs a higher initial investment suitable for enterprises seeking comprehensive features.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers seamless integration with Microsoft products and AI-driven detections. In comparison, Varonis Platform excels in detailed file access insights and robust data governance, appealing to buyers needing extensive access management and those focused on maximizing security within Microsoft ecosystems.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers competitive setup costs, appealing to organizations seeking a budget-friendly solution, whereas Varonis Platform provides a more tailored pricing approach, reflecting its comprehensive data management features. The two offer distinct value proposition...
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers competitive setup costs, appealing to organizations seeking a budget-friendly solution, whereas Varonis Platform provides a more tailored pricing approach, reflecting its comprehensive data management features. The two offer distinct value proposition...
Prisma Cloud excels in multi-cloud security with automated forensics and compliance management. In comparison, Varonis Platform focuses on data governance and threat management. Prisma's flexible pricing appeals to cloud-centric users, while Varonis suits enterprises prioritizing data security.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a straightforward setup cost, while Varonis Platform requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a distinct cost difference.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a straightforward setup cost, while Varonis Platform requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a distinct cost difference.
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud excels in data integration and customization, benefiting businesses seeking flexible MDM solutions. In comparison, Varonis Platform focuses on data security and threat management, appealing to organizations prioritizing robust file activity monitoring and access governance.
Microsoft Purview integrates well with Azure, supports multi-cloud data protection, but needs better non-Microsoft integration. In comparison, Varonis excels in unstructured data governance but lacks comprehensive multi-cloud features, making it ideal for enterprises prioritizing internal security over cloud versatility.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance has lower initial setup costs with more streamlined deployment, whereas Varonis Platform may involve higher upfront expenses but offers comprehensive capabilities, highlighting key differences in pricing and implementation.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance has lower initial setup costs with more streamlined deployment, whereas Varonis Platform may involve higher upfront expenses but offers comprehensive capabilities, highlighting key differences in pricing and implementation.
Cortex XDR impresses with advanced detection and integration ease, appealing for its pricing flexibility. In comparison, Varonis excels in data governance and protection, attracting attention for specialized compliance functionalities despite high costs, which increase with additional modular features, yet offer substantial ROI.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks features upfront setup costs that can be higher than the Varonis Platform, reflecting their different initial investment requirements.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks features upfront setup costs that can be higher than the Varonis Platform, reflecting their different initial investment requirements.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange excels in seamless VPN connectivity and cloud integration. In comparison, Varonis offers robust data governance and monitoring. Zscaler is praised for ease of deployment, while Varonis provides depth in data access management, appealing to diverse organizational needs.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform setup cost is competitive and transparent, while Varonis Platform boasts a potentially higher setup investment yet offers extensive data security features.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform setup cost is competitive and transparent, while Varonis Platform boasts a potentially higher setup investment yet offers extensive data security features.
Microsoft Purview excels in auto-labeling and integration with Microsoft environments, offering strong compliance across platforms. In comparison, Varonis stands out with robust data access governance and threat management, providing monitoring for unstructured data, though it requires more permissions and involves higher costs.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention typically involves less setup cost, while the Varonis Platform tends to incur higher initial expenditures, highlighting a notable difference in upfront financial investment between the two.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention typically involves less setup cost, while the Varonis Platform tends to incur higher initial expenditures, highlighting a notable difference in upfront financial investment between the two.
Varonis Platform stands out for user-friendly deployment and data protection, appealing to businesses prioritizing ease of use. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM attracts tech-savvy users with its advanced threat intelligence and machine learning capabilities, offering robust security features for comprehensive threat management.
Varonis Platform setup cost is straightforward with a predictable pricing structure, whereas Cortex XSIAM requires a higher initial investment with a flexible pricing model.
Varonis Platform setup cost is straightforward with a predictable pricing structure, whereas Cortex XSIAM requires a higher initial investment with a flexible pricing model.
Microsoft Defender for Identity offers strong integration with Microsoft 365, enhancing identity security and threat intelligence. In comparison, Varonis Platform excels in data access governance, providing detailed data usage insights, making it suitable for data-sensitive environments seeking compliance and governance capabilities.
Microsoft Defender for Identity offers a straightforward, cost-effective setup, while the Varonis Platform involves a higher initial setup cost, reflecting the distinction in their pricing strategies and infrastructure requirements.
Microsoft Defender for Identity offers a straightforward, cost-effective setup, while the Varonis Platform involves a higher initial setup cost, reflecting the distinction in their pricing strategies and infrastructure requirements.
Cynet offers holistic cybersecurity with robust threat detection and ease of management for small teams. In comparison, Varonis specializes in data access governance with strong compliance features. Cynet is budget-friendly, whereas Varonis provides effective capabilities for comprehensive data security.
Cynet offers a lower setup cost compared to Varonis Platform, making it a more budget-friendly option. Varonis Platform, while higher in setup cost, provides comprehensive security features catering to complex organizational needs.
Cynet offers a lower setup cost compared to Varonis Platform, making it a more budget-friendly option. Varonis Platform, while higher in setup cost, provides comprehensive security features catering to complex organizational needs.
Collibra Governance is ideal for customizable data management, emphasizing workflows and collaboration. In comparison, Varonis Platform focuses on data security and threat detection, making it suitable for enhanced protection needs. Both solutions cater to different priorities, guiding tech buyers based on specific requirements.
Collibra Governance involves an initial setup cost that can be steep for some organizations, whereas Varonis Platform presents a more budget-friendly setup cost, making the latter potentially more attractive for those with financial constraints.
Collibra Governance involves an initial setup cost that can be steep for some organizations, whereas Varonis Platform presents a more budget-friendly setup cost, making the latter potentially more attractive for those with financial constraints.
Alation Data Catalog excels in data discovery and governance, appealing to users prioritizing intuitive data operations. In comparison, Varonis Platform offers advanced security and threat detection, attracting buyers prioritizing robust data protection over ease of deployment, aligning with those focused on comprehensive security measures.
Alation Data Catalog has a moderate setup cost, offering flexibility for businesses, while Varonis Platform, with a higher setup expense, provides an advanced security feature set.
Alation Data Catalog has a moderate setup cost, offering flexibility for businesses, while Varonis Platform, with a higher setup expense, provides an advanced security feature set.
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention excels in endpoint protection and advanced analytics, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive integration. In comparison, Varonis Platform focuses on data access monitoring and unified reporting, offering insights into user patterns, suitable for organizations prioritizing efficient data governance.
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention involves a moderate setup cost, whereas the Varonis Platform has a higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in cost considerations for these solutions.
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention involves a moderate setup cost, whereas the Varonis Platform has a higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in cost considerations for these solutions.
BigID excels in data discovery and AI-driven capabilities, benefiting data-intensive companies with modular pricing. In comparison, Varonis offers seamless data access monitoring and unified reporting, appealing to organizations prioritizing on-premises deployment and comprehensive threat management, despite its higher licensing costs. Both ensure robust compliance management.
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP excels in compliance and security visibility, ideal for cloud-focused organizations. In comparison, Varonis Platform targets data protection and access control, suitable for enterprises emphasizing data governance. Each solution offers unique strengths that cater to different security priorities.
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers a competitive setup cost with flexibility, while Varonis Platform may have higher initial expenses with a focus on comprehensive features.
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers a competitive setup cost with flexibility, while Varonis Platform may have higher initial expenses with a focus on comprehensive features.
Microsoft Entra ID Protection excels in identity security with features like conditional access and integration with Microsoft Defender. In comparison, Varonis Platform offers strong data security solutions with superior data access governance. Microsoft Entra is ideal for identity management, while Varonis targets comprehensive data governance.
Microsoft Entra ID Protection's setup cost is competitive, offering an affordable option for businesses, while Varonis Platform presents a higher initial investment, which may deter those with budget constraints.
Microsoft Entra ID Protection's setup cost is competitive, offering an affordable option for businesses, while Varonis Platform presents a higher initial investment, which may deter those with budget constraints.
Cyera appeals to businesses with agile pricing, swift deployment, real-time data discovery, and excellent customer support. In comparison, Varonis Platform attracts companies needing robust threat detection, comprehensive features, and substantial ROI, despite a potentially higher initial investment and longer deployment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM focuses on behavior analytics and UEBA for threat detection and offers flexible cloud deployment. In comparison, Varonis excels in data access governance and threat management, ensuring robust data security and providing valuable insights into data access activities.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Varonis Platform. Varonis Platform provides a more cost-effective option for initial deployment expenses.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Varonis Platform. Varonis Platform provides a more cost-effective option for initial deployment expenses.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention offers comprehensive data protection with detailed policy management and encryption support. In comparison, Varonis Platform provides robust access governance and threat management features, making it attractive for companies prioritizing data visibility and discovery, despite higher costs.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention reviews highlight a moderate setup cost, whereas Varonis Platform reports generally lower initial expenses, making Varonis potentially more budget-friendly upfront.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention reviews highlight a moderate setup cost, whereas Varonis Platform reports generally lower initial expenses, making Varonis potentially more budget-friendly upfront.
Vanta focuses on operational efficiency and user support with streamlined compliance management, making it ideal for businesses seeking quick deployment. In comparison, Varonis Platform offers a robust feature set and comprehensive data security, appealing to organizations needing advanced protection and extensive data governance.
ThreatLocker emphasizes endpoint security and application control, enhancing client support and value. In comparison, Varonis focuses on data protection and access visibility, appealing to large enterprises despite higher costs. A tech buyer might choose ThreatLocker for pricing or Varonis for comprehensive governance.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers a simplified setup with lower initial costs, while Varonis Platform incurs higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive deployment process, highlighting their differences in ease and expense during implementation.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers a simplified setup with lower initial costs, while Varonis Platform incurs higher setup expenses due to its comprehensive deployment process, highlighting their differences in ease and expense during implementation.
Ataccama ONE offers strong data management capabilities, appealing to organizations seeking an all-in-one solution. In comparison, Varonis provides superior data security features, attracting businesses focused on protecting sensitive information. Each platform suits different priorities, with Ataccama for management and Varonis for security.
Ataccama ONE Platform setup costs are competitive, whereas Varonis Platform typically has higher upfront expenses. Consider Ataccama for budget-conscious options, and Varonis for comprehensive data security features.
Ataccama ONE Platform setup costs are competitive, whereas Varonis Platform typically has higher upfront expenses. Consider Ataccama for budget-conscious options, and Varonis for comprehensive data security features.
Drata provides cost-effective pricing and quick deployment, ideal for streamlined compliance through automation. In comparison, Varonis Platform offers extensive data protection and analytics, suitable for organizations prioritizing comprehensive security features despite higher costs and complex deployment.
Drata offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Varonis Platform involves a more intricate setup process that might lead to higher expenses.
Drata offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Varonis Platform involves a more intricate setup process that might lead to higher expenses.
Silverfort appeals with advanced authentication and competitive pricing for fast ROI. In comparison, Varonis attracts tech buyers seeking robust data protection, offering comprehensive features for higher initial investment. Silverfort's ease of deployment contrasts Varonis's extensive support for complex environments.
Silverfort offers a lower setup cost with straightforward implementation, while Varonis Platform involves a higher initial expense due to its extensive customization options.
Silverfort offers a lower setup cost with straightforward implementation, while Varonis Platform involves a higher initial expense due to its extensive customization options.
Mimecast Incydr excels in affordability and faster deployment with responsive support, perfect for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Varonis Platform's comprehensive features and data protection capabilities attract those seeking advanced security, despite higher costs and a longer setup process.
Mimecast Incydr offers competitive setup costs, while Varonis Platform involves a higher initial investment. The pricing contrast highlights the affordability of Mimecast Incydr and the premium nature of Varonis Platform.
Mimecast Incydr offers competitive setup costs, while Varonis Platform involves a higher initial investment. The pricing contrast highlights the affordability of Mimecast Incydr and the premium nature of Varonis Platform.
Microsoft Purview is ideal for environments needing seamless integration and strong DLP policies, while Varonis is preferred for its data governance and detailed access visibility. In comparison, Purview excels in compliance, and Varonis provides robust threat management, appealing to different security needs.
Microsoft Purview Information Protection offers straightforward setup costs compared to the more complex pricing of Varonis Platform. Varonis might present higher initial fees, contrasting with the potentially lower entry point of Microsoft Purview.
Microsoft Purview Information Protection offers straightforward setup costs compared to the more complex pricing of Varonis Platform. Varonis might present higher initial fees, contrasting with the potentially lower entry point of Microsoft Purview.
SentinelOne Singularity Identity offers AI-driven threat detection, ideal for security-focused buyers needing dynamic capabilities. In comparison, Varonis Platform excels in data access governance, appealing to those prioritizing detailed tracking and data classification, despite its higher cost.
Varonis Platform is praised for competitive pricing and strong support, making it ideal for budgets focused on value. In comparison, Trellix DLP attracts buyers with its advanced features, catering to organizations requiring detailed data protection despite higher initial costs.
Varonis Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Trellix DLP, offering advanced features that justify the expense, whereas Trellix DLP provides a more cost-efficient setup option appealing to budget-conscious users.
Varonis Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Trellix DLP, offering advanced features that justify the expense, whereas Trellix DLP provides a more cost-efficient setup option appealing to budget-conscious users.
Erwin Data Intelligence excels in automation scripts and customization, offering rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Varonis Platform focuses on data security and compliance, with advanced monitoring and governance, making it ideal for buyers prioritizing robust protection.
Erwin Data Intelligence features a lower setup cost, whereas Varonis Platform involves a higher initial investment, highlighting their differing approaches to budget considerations.
Erwin Data Intelligence features a lower setup cost, whereas Varonis Platform involves a higher initial investment, highlighting their differing approaches to budget considerations.
Varonis Platform excels in advanced data analytics and threat detection for in-depth data security insights. In comparison, Safetica ONE focuses on straightforward data protection for easy integration, appealing to organizations prioritizing efficiency and uncomplicated implementation with competitive pricing for cost-effective solutions.
Varonis Platform offers better pricing and customer support for data protection and compliance. In comparison, BloodHound Enterprise provides expansive network analysis and visualization suited for experienced teams, with higher setup costs justified by robust security benefits in environments needing detailed vulnerability assessments.
Varonis Platform has a straightforward setup cost with minimal complexity, while BloodHound Enterprise requires a higher initial investment due to extensive customization options.
Varonis Platform has a straightforward setup cost with minimal complexity, while BloodHound Enterprise requires a higher initial investment due to extensive customization options.
Veza appeals to budget-conscious organizations with efficient access management and seamless integrations. In comparison, Varonis Platform justifies its higher cost with comprehensive data protection and advanced threat detection, offering substantial ROI for those prioritizing extensive data security.
Palo Alto Networks excels in integration, enhancing security with minimal setup. In comparison, Varonis offers extensive data analytics and protection capabilities, demanding more configuration but delivering rich insights. Tech buyers might prefer Palo Alto for simplicity or Varonis for detailed analytics.
Microsoft Purview offers seamless integration and automation across cloud services, appealing to organizations within the Microsoft ecosystem. In comparison, Varonis provides superior control and visibility into data interactions, making it attractive for those prioritizing meticulous data monitoring and governance.
Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager involves flexible setup costs, while the Varonis Platform features a more straightforward pricing structure. Both solutions cater to different budget needs, highlighting their unique pricing approaches.
Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager involves flexible setup costs, while the Varonis Platform features a more straightforward pricing structure. Both solutions cater to different budget needs, highlighting their unique pricing approaches.
Securiti offers a more cost-effective initial setup compared to Varonis Platform, which has higher setup charges. The pricing difference highlights the emphasis on affordability for Securiti while Varonis offers enhanced features justifying its higher costs.
Securiti offers a more cost-effective initial setup compared to Varonis Platform, which has higher setup charges. The pricing difference highlights the emphasis on affordability for Securiti while Varonis offers enhanced features justifying its higher costs.
Netskope DLP offers cloud-native protection, ideal for those focused on SaaS and cloud environments with flexible pricing. In comparison, Varonis Platform delivers advanced analysis and threat detection for on-premise security, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive data protection despite higher costs.
Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) has a lower setup cost compared to the Varonis Platform, which tends to have higher initial expenses for implementation.
Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) has a lower setup cost compared to the Varonis Platform, which tends to have higher initial expenses for implementation.
Obsidian CDR focuses on centralized data management with compliance support, appealing to cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, Varonis offers advanced threat detection and extensive data security features, justifying a higher investment for businesses seeking comprehensive protection and a strong commitment to customer service.
Obsidian CDR Platform has a lower setup cost compared to the Varonis Platform, highlighting a cost-effective option for users prioritizing budget management. In contrast, the Varonis Platform might incur higher initial expenses due to its advanced features.
Obsidian CDR Platform has a lower setup cost compared to the Varonis Platform, highlighting a cost-effective option for users prioritizing budget management. In contrast, the Varonis Platform might incur higher initial expenses due to its advanced features.
AppOmni is selected for its cost-effective pricing and efficient ROI, appealing to those with budget constraints. In comparison, Varonis Platform attracts tech buyers seeking robust features, as its comprehensive cybersecurity and data analysis capabilities justify the higher investment for long-term benefits.
Varonis excels in security-centric data management, appealing to those prioritizing data protection. In comparison, Atlan attracts users with an intuitive interface for seamless data collaboration and discovery. Both cater to different needs, offering unique strengths in deployment and customer support.
OneTrust DataGovernance stands out with intuitive design and competitive pricing, appealing to businesses seeking efficient compliance management. In comparison, Varonis Platform attracts those prioritizing robust security, offering advanced monitoring features that justify its higher investment.
OneTrust DataGovernance may involve initial setup costs, while Varonis Platform could require higher setup expenses. Consider these differences when evaluating both solutions.
OneTrust DataGovernance may involve initial setup costs, while Varonis Platform could require higher setup expenses. Consider these differences when evaluating both solutions.
Cyberhaven impresses with real-time location tracing and automated breach response, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with its cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Varonis excels in data classification and compliance management, attracting organizations prioritizing comprehensive security and long-term ROI with advanced features.
Cyberhaven offers a low setup cost, providing an affordable entry point, while Varonis Platform's setup cost is higher, reflecting its broad feature set.
Cyberhaven offers a low setup cost, providing an affordable entry point, while Varonis Platform's setup cost is higher, reflecting its broad feature set.
Amazon Macie integrates seamlessly into AWS, excelling in data classification and protection for AWS environments. In comparison, Varonis Platform offers comprehensive data governance and threat detection, catering to enterprises with complex security needs. Each delivers significant ROI based on organizational priorities.
Amazon Macie involves no setup cost, offering simplicity, while Varonis Platform may require initial setup investment, highlighting a difference in initial financial commitment between the two.
Amazon Macie involves no setup cost, offering simplicity, while Varonis Platform may require initial setup investment, highlighting a difference in initial financial commitment between the two.
GTB Technologies Inspector is ideal for those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and superior support with efficient data loss prevention. In comparison, Varonis Platform appeals to buyers needing extensive features like advanced threat detection, offering substantial returns despite its complexity and higher costs.
GTB Technologies Inspector offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, whereas Varonis Platform involves a higher setup expense that reflects its advanced features and capabilities.
GTB Technologies Inspector offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, whereas Varonis Platform involves a higher setup expense that reflects its advanced features and capabilities.
Veritas Data Insight excels in managing unstructured data with granular analysis and ease of deployment. In comparison, Varonis Platform offers advanced security features and comprehensive protection, appealing to organizations prioritizing data security, despite potentially higher implementation efforts and costs.
Varonis Platform excels in data classification, threat detection, and behavior analysis, ideal for comprehensive data protection. In comparison, Semperis offers efficient Active Directory recovery, real-time alerts, and conflict resolution, appealing to those prioritizing Active Directory resilience and integration.
Varonis Platform incurs higher setup costs but offers a comprehensive data protection suite, while Semperis Directory Services Protector features lower setup costs, focusing on identity and access management.
Varonis Platform incurs higher setup costs but offers a comprehensive data protection suite, while Semperis Directory Services Protector features lower setup costs, focusing on identity and access management.
Immuta offers simple integration and superior policy management, attracting tech buyers prioritizing ease of use and compliance. In comparison, Varonis Platform provides detailed data security and analytics, appealing to those seeking strong protection for unstructured data and comprehensive threat detection capabilities.
Immuta typically involves lower setup costs compared to the Varonis Platform, highlighting a more budget-friendly initial investment, whereas Varonis may offer a comprehensive feature set that potentially justifies its higher setup expenses for specific use cases.
Immuta typically involves lower setup costs compared to the Varonis Platform, highlighting a more budget-friendly initial investment, whereas Varonis may offer a comprehensive feature set that potentially justifies its higher setup expenses for specific use cases.
Lepide offers affordability and user-focused support ideal for straightforward security needs and quick ROI. In comparison, Varonis Platform provides extensive features like advanced threat detection and data governance, appealing to organizations requiring detailed data insights and robust protection despite a higher initial investment.
Lepide offers a competitive setup cost, making it more accessible for smaller organizations, while Varonis Platform's higher setup cost reflects its extensive security features suitable for larger enterprises.
Lepide offers a competitive setup cost, making it more accessible for smaller organizations, while Varonis Platform's higher setup cost reflects its extensive security features suitable for larger enterprises.
Adaptive Shield appeals with its streamlined SaaS security and affordable pricing. In comparison, Varonis Platform impresses with extensive data protection features, justifying its higher cost. Adaptive Shield is ideal for quick deployment needs, whereas Varonis offers comprehensive coverage for complex security requirements.
Adaptive Shield's setup cost is generally lower than Varonis Platform's, which is often seen as more substantial due to its extensive features and integrations.
Adaptive Shield's setup cost is generally lower than Varonis Platform's, which is often seen as more substantial due to its extensive features and integrations.
