Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025
Microsoft Purview Information Protection and Varonis Platform compete in the data protection and governance category. Microsoft Purview appears to have an advantage in data protection across diverse environments, while Varonis excels in data access governance and threat management.
Features: Microsoft Purview Information Protection provides robust data protection and automated labeling across multi-platform and multi-cloud environments, highly integrating with other Microsoft services. Its encryption capabilities maintain data security even in complex scenarios. Varonis Platform is valued for its detailed visibility into data access activities, effectively identifying unauthorized access. It offers a centralized reporting system and excels in managing access permissions without impacting performance.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Purview needs enhancements in third-party application visibility and expanding its DLP capabilities beyond Microsoft ecosystems. Improvement in reporting and AI integration for better data analysis and automation is also suggested, along with price adjustments and customer support enhancements. Varonis should focus on better cloud-supportive functions and enhance its DLP capabilities. The complexity in setup and dependency on on-premises deployment needs addressing, and its pricing may not be feasible for mid-sized enterprises.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview demonstrates flexibility in deploying in public and hybrid clouds but faces challenges with inconsistent customer support. Varonis shows adaptability across on-premises and hybrid models but complicates interface setup. Its customer service is seen as effective, with occasional complexity due to detailed configuration processes.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview is viewed as competitively priced, offering value through integrated features in the E5 licensing suite, beneficial for users needing comprehensive protection across Microsoft services. Varonis, with its higher module-based pricing, is considered costly, requiring additional expenses for server monitoring but is worthwhile for larger enterprises requiring detailed data governance and security insights.
