Visual Studio Test Professional Reviews

I am using this solution to automate the sequencing of processes and to manage them. For example, using remote access services to see the interactions between applications. It has taken us two years to build the tool we are working on. 

The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable. The documentation is simple but you will need to explore the solution and put in the effort for success.

One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone. Additionally, I would like to see an orchestrator added to the solution.

I have been using the solution for approximately 15 years.

The stability is great, I trust in the solution.

We have 20 people in my organization using the solution.

The installation of the solution is easy. However, if you want some additional components such as Workflow which is not including in the original packaging of the solution, it will take more time to install.

The solution is very powerful but you have to know how to use it.

I rate Visual Studio Test Professional an eight out of ten.

I use it for coding, debugging, and other usual things.

It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us.

It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio.

In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux.

I have been using this solution for four or five years. 

I haven't contacted their technical support. We always search on the web. You can easily find most of the information on the web or Microsoft site. They have a big community, and you can find the information very easily.

The initial installation is very good and easy. In 2015, they added a visual installer, which made it easier than before. Nowadays, we use Visual Studio to change or modify some of the packages, and it is much easier than before.

I would recommend this solution. I would rate Visual Studio Test Professional a seven out of ten.

We use it for the the developing web applications than web services Test applications.

It has some of the best documentation in the world.

There are some stability users that needs to be bettered.

I have been using Visual Studio Test Professional since the mid-eighties.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. Only five users are using a solution.

One of the best technical support team.

The initial setup is easy.

There is a Return on Investment.

It is a price-effective solution.

Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten.

As a software developer working on the Microsoft platform, I find Visual Studio Test Professional to be a valuable tool for ensuring the quality and reliability of my applications.

Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work. It easily works with Visual Studio, helping me find and fix bugs fast. It does both manual and automated testing, making sure my app works well.

In terms of improvement, I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options.

.

Visual Studio Test Pro is quite stable.

It is fairly scalable.

The support is good, but it could be a bit faster.

The initial setup is fairly simple. 

It is a bit pricey.

Overall, I would rate Visual Studio Test Pro as an eight out of ten.

We use this solution to develop code.

The price could be improved.

I have been using this solution for two years.

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

The initial setup is easy. It's easy to configure.

The deployment can be done in-house.

We pay for the license. The licensing model is per year. So, yearly-based license.

I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where ten is the most expensive and one is the cheapest.

Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. I would definitely recommend using the solution.

We use the solution for coding.

I would like to see more integration in the solution.

The solution is stable. I would rate it a ten out of ten.

The product’s technical support is fast.

The solution was easy to setup. It will take less than an hour to setup.

I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area.

It's great for the development of .NET.

The solution should be cheaper. But unfortunately, Microsoft products are usually expensive.

We've been using this solution for several years and have used Visual Studio 10, 12 and 13. We use it both as a cloud solution and on-premises.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. It is secure because most of our applications are in .NET.

The deployment was not complicated, and our developers completed the deployment. Only those two developers use the solution, and we don't plan to increase usage at this time.

Visual Studio Test Professional has an annual license.

I rate this solution a ten out of ten. I recommend Visual Studio Test Professional, primarily if you work with .NET. If we are developing something in .NET or C++, we use Visual Studio. But if we are developing something in Java, we have to use Java.

Our primary use case of this solution is for UA automation. I'm a process manager and we are customers of Visual Studio. 

The product is very easy to use and we were able to scale up the automation solution quickly which was beneficial.

It's an expensive solution which is an issue for us. 

I've been using this solution for five years. 

The solution is stable and we get upgrades every couple of years. Most of our developers use Visual Studio; we have around 150 users in total.

The initial setup is straightforward, it took us around four to five hours and we were able to do it by ourselves with our own three-person IT team.

We pay an annual licensing fee. 

We took a look at Tricentis Tosca and SmartBear TestComplete a few months ago but nothing has been finalized. We're looking for an alternative to Visual Studio Test Professional. 

If cost is not an issue then I would recommend this solution. 

I rate this solution eight out of 10.