OpenText Application Quality Management vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.6

OpenText Application Quality Management improves efficiency, collaboration, and project tracking, leading to substantial time and cost savings.

Sentiment score

6.8

Visual Studio Test Professional boosts efficiency and productivity with cost-saving benefits, significantly enhancing development environments and quality.

It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

Partner at IS Nordic AS

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.2

OpenText Application Quality Management is praised for responsive support, though some users experience delays and varying service quality.

Sentiment score

6.8

Customers appreciate Visual Studio Test Professional's support, though some highlight navigation challenges and delays reaching knowledgeable staff.

Technical support has been excellent.

President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Quality is always high yet not perfect.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

Partner at IS Nordic AS

I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

OpenText Application Quality Management is adaptable, scalable, and flexible, handling large projects well despite minor licensing and performance issues.

Sentiment score

7.4

Visual Studio Test Professional is highly scalable, adaptable, and supports large teams, though some find licensing costs a concern.

OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

OpenText Application Quality Management is stable and dependable, with minor issues often tied to network or hardware, not software.

Sentiment score

7.9

Visual Studio Test Professional is stable with high ratings, minor bugs, and reliable updates, despite occasional third-party integration issues.

From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Room For Improvement

OpenText Application Quality Management faces high costs, poor usability, limited integration, and requires better reporting and performance enhancements.

Visual Studio Test Professional needs better integration, user-friendliness, scalability, modern features, and improved performance and documentation.

Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.

Huong Vuong

Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation

As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern.

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.

reviewer1477047

Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.

ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ

Chief Product Officer at Gradiant

Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

Setup Cost

OpenText Application Quality Management is costly for users, prompting negotiations and exploration of alternatives like JIRA due to expenses.

Visual Studio Test Professional's pricing is high, yet valued for its functionality, offering free and professional licensing options.

It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

The price is expensive.

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

Valuable Features

OpenText Application Quality Management excels in traceability, integration, customization, centralized management, and collaboration, enhancing project efficiency and scalability.

Visual Studio Test Professional offers robust integration, user-friendly tools, and customization for efficient cross-platform development and team collaboration.

It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.

Partner at IS Nordic AS

The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report

President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.

reviewer1477047

Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

It supports cross-platform functionality.

ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.

Chief Product Officer at Gradiant

We have a retrospective in our auto projects that we are using frequently to get lessons learned, what went well, and what is going wrong.

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (4th), Quality Management Software (1st)

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 9.0%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 2.8%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	9.0%
Visual Studio Test Professional	2.8%
Other	88.2%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

Partner at IS Nordic AS

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Government

Manufacturing Company

15%

Performing Arts

13%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	162

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?

The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 8% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 6% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Application Quality Management

January 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Visual Studio Test Professional

January 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

No data available

Overview

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa