Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText Application Quality Management are prominent tools in the software testing category. Visual Studio Test Professional seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, which provides extensive development support.
Features: Visual Studio Test Professional offers features like IntelliSense, Azure DevOps integration, and GitHub Copilot support. OpenText Application Quality Management focuses on robust traceability from requirements to execution and integrates well with MS Excel.
Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional could improve its automation script integration, cloud service compatibility, and support documentation. OpenText Application Quality Management would benefit from enhanced reporting capabilities, better agile support, and improved performance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional supports both on-premises and cloud deployments, noted for high customer service ratings but slower technical support. OpenText suits large enterprises with versatile deployment options, and while its technical support is well-rated, it can be expensive.
Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional offers a free community version alongside professional licenses, with a good ROI due to its feature-rich environment that boosts productivity. OpenText Application Quality Management, although costly, provides comprehensive lifecycle management; however, it is often seen as overpriced.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
As for the scalability of OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, there are limitations, particularly in agile methodologies, which is currently my main concern.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
The price is expensive.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
We have a retrospective in our auto projects that we are using frequently to get lessons learned, what went well, and what is going wrong.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 8.2% |
| Visual Studio Test Professional | 3.2% |
| Other | 88.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 162 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
