Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

Tricentis and Microsoft are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Tricentis is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7, while Microsoft is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. Tricentis holds a 8.1% mindshare in TMT, compared to Microsoft’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Tricentis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Tricentis qTest

Read 19 Tricentis qTest reviews

1,977 Views
1,483 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Read 53 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews

1,602 Views
481 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Tricentis qTest

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Visual Studio Test Professional and Tricentis qTest are two leading test management solutions. Tricentis qTest appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive features and robust functionality.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional integrates seamlessly with Azure DevOps, manages test cases efficiently with Microsoft tools, and ensures streamlined workflows. Tricentis qTest supports Agile and DevOps methodologies, offers superior automation capabilities, and provides advanced reporting features. qTest's comprehensive feature set makes it suitable for complex testing environments.

Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional needs better automation, more flexible reporting options, and an improved user interface. Tricentis qTest could enhance usability, improve integration with third-party tools, and streamline the setup process. Focusing on these enhancements would significantly benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional's straightforward deployment suits Microsoft-centric environments but has less responsive customer service. Tricentis qTest has a more complex deployment due to broader tool integration but offers highly responsive and supportive customer service. qTest's customer support is a notable advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional is cost-effective for Microsoft product users. Tricentis qTest has higher upfront costs but provides better ROI due to its extensive features and capabilities. The comprehensive feature set and better ROI make qTest a more attractive long-term option.

To learn more, read our detailed Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

1.0

Tricentis qTest delivers ROI by enhancing efficiency, visibility, and collaboration, with quick adoption, ease of use, and seamless upgrades.

Sentiment score

6.8

Visual Studio Test Professional boosts efficiency and productivity with cost-saving benefits, significantly enhancing development environments and quality.

Due to the fast adoption, there is a quick ROI along with faster and better maintenance due to Tosca's AI and self-healing aspects.

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

1.0

Tricentis qTest customer service is responsive and effective, despite integration challenges and occasional slower first-tier support.

Sentiment score

6.8

Customers appreciate Visual Studio Test Professional's support, though some highlight navigation challenges and delays reaching knowledgeable staff.

Support has never been an issue, except for consulting which Tricentis charges for.

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

8.3

Tricentis qTest offers scalable, seamless performance supporting global teams, requiring minimal maintenance, with robust integration and feature growth.

Sentiment score

7.4

Visual Studio Test Professional is highly scalable, adaptable, and supports large teams, though some find licensing costs a concern.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.1

Tricentis qTest offers stable performance with rare downtime, consistent availability, and improved integration, receiving positive user feedback.

Sentiment score

7.9

Visual Studio Test Professional is stable with high ratings, minor bugs, and reliable updates, despite occasional third-party integration issues.

As for stability and performance, apart from a few hiccups and glitches, Tricentis qTest worked fine.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Room For Improvement

Tricentis qTest requires improved reporting, better integration, enhanced user interface, installation processes, and faster, robust support and features.

Visual Studio Test Professional needs better integration, user-friendliness, scalability, modern features, and improved performance and documentation.

There may be missing features that should be included in the next release of Tricentis qTest, such as integration with other tools, specifically integration with Parasoft.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It also does not allow for task tracking or calculating time spent on tasks, which affects project timelines.

Prajkta Ambekar

Test Automation Specialist -Full Stack at IBM

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.

ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ

Chief Product Officer at Gradiant

Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Setup Cost

Tricentis qTest offers moderate enterprise pricing, supports global teams, and includes options for volume discounts and optional tools.

Visual Studio Test Professional's pricing is high, yet valued for its functionality, offering free and professional licensing options.

The solution is expensive.

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The pricing and execution of qTest are easy.

Prajkta Ambekar

Test Automation Specialist -Full Stack at IBM

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

The price is expensive.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Valuable Features

Tricentis qTest provides seamless integration, robust reporting, and scalable test management, enhancing agile testing efficiency across diverse needs.

Visual Studio Test Professional offers robust integration, user-friendly tools, and customization for efficient cross-platform development and team collaboration.

There are also AI insights available based on the data and defects raised, which gives a view of functionalities where there are challenges and where more regression needs to happen.

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

A valuable feature is the ease of uploading, as well as creating folders.

Prajkta Ambekar

Test Automation Specialist -Full Stack at IBM

I have seen measurable benefits with Tricentis qTest in terms of time-saving and resource-saving.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tricentis qTest report

It supports cross-platform functionality.

CharlesChang

Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry

Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.

ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ

Chief Product Officer at Gradiant

We have a retrospective in our auto projects that we are using frequently to get lessons learned, what went well, and what is going wrong.

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Visual Studio Test Professional report

Categories and Ranking

Tricentis qTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Visual Studio Test Professi...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Tricentis qTest is 8.1%, down from 15.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 3.1%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tricentis qTest	8.1%
Visual Studio Test Professional	3.1%
Other	88.8%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

User stories and test artifacts migrate seamlessly to innovative management tools

Customers are moving towards Tricentis due to their association with SAP. There is interest in understanding if there are connectors for converting UFT scripts to Tosca, as many customers are looking to make this transition. We have developed capabilities for automated migration from ALM to Tricentis qTest without any loss of data. However, for UFT to Tosca migration, scripts need to be rewritten as there are no automatic converters available. From a project perspective, there have not been many challenges with Tricentis products. The main improvement area would be developing a connector to move UFT scripts to Tosca, which would enable quicker and easier movement for customers. This would aid faster adoption of Tosca and ease the financial pressure on clients who currently need to invest in rewriting scripts.

Read full review

Payel Saha

Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting

Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

Insurance Company

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Performing Arts

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis qTest?

The solution is expensive. For the features that are available, depending on the volumes of licenses we get, we are able to get better discounts as strategic partners of Tosca. We can pass some ben...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tricentis qTest?

One of the things I noticed was the reporting part wasn't very good. It was hard to customize the dashboards in Tricentis qTest, and there were limitations in the dashboard. There may be missing fe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tricentis qTest?

The main use cases for Tricentis qTest are for test management, to keep test cases and execute those. Overall, centralized test management with Tricentis qTest was beneficial for the team's product...

See all answers

What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?

The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?

The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 14% of the time

TestRail vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 13% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 6% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis qTest

Compared 4% of the time

More Tricentis qTest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 9% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Compared 6% of the time

More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis qTest

January 2026

Download Tricentis qTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Visual Studio Test Professional

January 2026

Download Visual Studio Test Professional product report

Also Known As

qTest

No data available

Overview

Tricentis is the global leader in enterprise continuous testing, widely credited for reinventing software testing for DevOps, cloud, and enterprise applications. The Tricentis AI-based, continuous testing platform provides a new and fundamentally different way to perform software testing. An approach that’s totally automated, fully codeless, and intelligently driven by AI. It addresses both agile development and complex enterprise apps, enabling enterprises to accelerate their digital transformation by dramatically increasing software release speed, reducing costs, and improving software quality.

Tricentis

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

McKesson, Accenture, Nationwide Insurance, Allianz, Telstra, Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton (LVMH PCIS), and Vodafone

Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

February 2026

Free Report: Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tricentis qTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.