Worksoft Certify Reviews

My usual use cases for Worksoft Certify involve mostly working on web and cloud nine applications, along with Oracle applications, CRM applications, and SAP applications. I have automated all of this using Worksoft Certify, from creating the test cases to executing them, scheduling them in CTM, which is Continuous Test Manager. I am also working on one more project where we use a radar which is on the Mac and iOS. We are doing all kinds of testing and integration using this tool.

Worksoft Certify has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to schedule the test cases using Continuous Test Manager, saving a lot of time. We do lights-off testing there, and the report generation is very smooth, with different types of reports generated in Worksoft Certify, making it easy for us to track script failures. They also provide a specific tool to generate our own reports using the template, known as BPT, Business Process Procedure, allowing us to modify and customize testing and reports based on our needs. This flexibility is very helpful because customers often have different requirements for report generation; some want detailed reports while others do not. This kind of feature helps us minimize time in report generation and makes it easier to understand the entire procedure.

The features and capabilities of Worksoft Certify that I have found the most valuable so far are primarily in testing, especially with SAP, where the testing is very smooth. Whenever we lightly touch or record any objects' properties, the properties remain stable and it is very simple to identify and incorporate them in our scripts. Additionally, one of its best features is that it is codeless. Apart from two to three weeks of training, I don't need to know rigorous coding as required in Selenium and other tools. I find these features to be very attractive in Certify.

To improve or enhance Worksoft Certify in future releases, I believe integrating AI would be really great, as the market is moving towards AI. Additionally, features such as image recognition and more advanced OCR techniques could be developed further. Currently, these features do exist, but they are not up to mark. If it can read through the images effectively, that would be great.

I have been using Worksoft Certify for eight years now.

I find Worksoft Certify to be quite stable and reliable, but I recommend using releases that are already stable. If we frequently upgrade to the latest releases, it can be tricky and unstable since the recent releases are still being tested. Until we receive confirmation from the support team or Worksoft that a release is stable, we should avoid upgrading because it can have significant impacts, especially during database and software upgrades, which can be time-consuming, and reverting back to a previous version can also be tricky.

I have changed the scale at which I work by increasing the number of users and data volume. There is no discrepancy when multiple users are working simultaneously; for example, with fifteen licenses, all users can work at the same time without experiencing lag or slowness in the software. Based on this experience, I can rate it a nine.

Other than installation, I have reached out to the technical support of Worksoft Certify, especially when the objects are not recognized. For example, in coding tools, we build the object by picking its unique property, but in Certify, there is no need to build the object from scratch. The objects are already learned and stored in a configuration file. Sometimes when an object is not recognized, I contact the support team, and they ensure that they relearn that object and add it to our existing configuration.

I would rate the technical support of Worksoft Certify an eight. They solve every problem effectively, but there is often a bit of delay because they first try to understand the issue. If they cannot resolve it, they escalate it to a higher level of expertise, which requires me to explain the problem again, making the process time-consuming. My suggestion is that if a ticket is designated as critical, it should be moved directly to the second level of expertise.

Before using Worksoft Certify, I utilized different coding tools such as Playwright and Selenium. I found that the time consumed in Selenium and Playwright is quite excessive because we have to set up an entire project, import libraries, and everything for different projects. However, in Worksoft, I can simply create a folder and start creating the test cases without the need to set up any library or Java files or specify any paths. Compared to other tools which require coding techniques, I find Worksoft to be quite better.

I did not participate in the initial setup and deployment of Worksoft Certify, but I know they provide an EXE file for setup, and we just need to configure the database connection.

For the initial setup process of Worksoft Certify, I found it to be very straightforward. They provide a proper manual along with it detailing the steps to follow. If anyone gets stuck, there is also a support team available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week for assistance, and you can directly contact them for installation help.

I am not aware of the pricing of Worksoft Certify, as it depends on the entire enterprise license based on the company's requirements. You cannot get it as a single-person license for other tools; it is based on the number of licenses provided according to your company's needs.

For scalability, I need clarification on the specific terms you are asking about. I want to ensure I understand the context of your question regarding expanding infrastructure for more users or extending the usage of Worksoft Certify.

Worksoft Certify is deployed on-premises in my organization.

I have not had the chance to evaluate the tangible benefits or ROI since using Worksoft Certify.

I would rate Worksoft Certify around a seven overall. As I mentioned earlier, with the current growth in AI and other advanced techniques, there is significant scope for introducing new features to keep it updated with market requirements.

On-premises

We obtain use cases from the functional team, and then we conduct a feasibility analysis because there will be some hurdles or obstructions for any automation tool. Similarly with Worksoft Certify, we encounter some areas where we are unable to proceed with the automation of those particular areas. Once they are finalized, we move to automation by using Worksoft Certify. We can use any of the capturing methods to design a test case, and once it is done, we move the test case to final validation and close the test script. In this way, we generate the use cases.

Currently, I have not had exposure to using AI tools within Worksoft Certify, but I have heard that from version 14 onward, there are some compact features that have been developed within Worksoft Certify which are easy to use, especially for web automation. However, I have not come across any such features yet. I am waiting for the opportunity to work with them.

We have used Business Capture. Business Capture is basically an easy process, but sometimes it comes in the format of XML where it does not help everyone understand in a better way. However, if someone is able to understand XML and if we are debugging the particular code generated during Business Capture, it is the best way to use it, apart from the two capturing methods that are available with Worksoft Certify.

The CTM, or Continuous Testing Manager, is a recent evolution that Worksoft Certify has undertaken, and we can say it is the upgraded version of the execution manager that we previously had. CTM is directly an advanced execution manager where we can see results once execution is completed, and immediately the results are displayed using a pie chart or any other graphical representation formats. CTM is useful in such a way that Azure can also be interlinked because Azure is the cloud platform evolving in recent times.

The competitor tool I have encountered recently is Tosca.

I would say Worksoft Certify is good and the best one to date when automating an SAP platform. When it comes to the web platform, Tosca is at an advanced level. Both tools have their independent exposure on different platforms and perform well. I would say both are at the same pace, but the utilization of the tool matters. If the team or organization is using web, they generally prefer Tosca, which works well with web applications. Other than web, when it comes to SAP or any other platforms, Worksoft Certify handles better.

For initial deployment, there should be involvement of three to four different teams. It is necessary for any procured tools, that is what I feel from my end. It is not that difficult to install Worksoft Certify on remote machines because it can be utilized in those machines, especially after COVID. The installation and licensing of the tool does not take much time if all the teams are aligned on the same page.

Rather than the product, I would first say from my experience that the immediate availability of a person or the support team is needed for anyone who requires help in areas wherever it is required. Because in recent times, I have encountered issues where once we face any kind of issues or once any kind of support is required, we need to log in through contact support in Worksoft Certify, and based on the priority that we set, the person or the concerned team would reach out to us. Definitely, this would delay half a day or a full day. The first point is that I feel immediate contact to a concerned team or person should be established so that the issue can be fixed at a better pace. This is the first area for improvement. It would definitely help in the improvement and utilization of this tool. Apart from this, I do not feel there is stress to be kept for improvement areas because in version 14, the prevailing version, it is designed in such a way that if any particular object fails, we do not need to sit and do the fixtures. Worksoft Certify has implemented it such that objects or attributes can be selected automatically, which is a very good improvement that saves time, especially in the dynamic working of automation. In this way, it works, but the main thing is the required immediate contact support. That is the core requirement.

I have been using Worksoft Certify for around 7.5 years.

I have encountered lagging with Worksoft Certify, but it is not specifically with the tool. It depends on where this particular tool is installed, including the RAM size or the disk size of that machine. I have seen lagging, but it is related to the installation area rather than the tool itself.

Based on my long experience, for scalability, I would give it a nine out of ten.

If I should rate the support for Worksoft Certify, I would give it a seven, which is a good score. However, if we have any chance, we can make it much easier, aiming for an eight or nine. The only issue is it takes some time for the concerned person or team to get back. If we could have direct contact through platforms like Teams for any immediate queries, it would save the tester's time. For now, it is a seven, but improvements could increase it to eight or nine.

Positive

I have not encountered the pricing areas where, out of my experience, I did not get a chance to go through the procurement part. However, I heard from the team that comparatively, Worksoft Certify is the better choice available at a low price compared to other tools like Tosca or any of the RPA tools which require a license. Worksoft Certify is the best choice available.

Worksoft Certify definitely requires maintenance. There are patch works done for at least the minor changes within the same version so that Worksoft Certify behaves more properly. The patchworks must be maintained for Worksoft Certify for any kind of versions that are upgraded. In this dynamic nature, everything is changing, so whenever new platforms or new versions of platforms are encountered, the current versions may or may not work. In these cases, the maintenance of the current version helps to understand how the tool reacts to particular platform changes, making it easier for a tester to automate their test cases. My overall rating for Worksoft Certify is nine out of ten.

I have experience with Continuous Test Manager for running tests across complex environments, and we have performed continuous integration with other tools where we are able to perform nightly runs across multiple machines and create scheduled test runs and get the results back using Worksoft.

Dynamic identification and scriptless automation is one of the features that I definitely appreciate in Worksoft, mainly in both Tricentis Tosca and Worksoft. Along with that, working on multiple SAP screens and having sub-processes and having the layouts and record sets helped a lot in maintaining the test data in a more effective way.

The main benefit that Worksoft Certify provides for me as an end user is scriptless automation, which is very important because there is no coding involved in it. The maintenance of the scripts is very simple, and I do not have to do a lot of maintenance of the test scripts once the scripts are created successfully. The maintenance is low, and the data maintenance is easy. Along with that, I can work on multiple applications and switch between applications effectively using this tool.

We can perform reporting at the time of execution from Worksoft, but we have to do a slight customization for it. We created our own custom reports using Excel and reporting and we were able to get the results as needed.

I have used some AI-powered test prioritization, and I feel that comparing with other tools, it can be improved more in Worksoft. There is a lot of scope for improvement in that area.

In terms of process documentation in Worksoft, we are able to recognize a majority of the objects using the business capture feature, which was good. I do not face any major challenges with it, apart from a few things like challenges with respect to performing drag and drop operations.

For points of improvement for Worksoft Certify, the first point is AI, the second one is technical support, and I feel that the UI improvements on Worksoft Certify over the last 11 years have been comparatively low compared to the competition in the market right now. There can be improvement in the execution duration, as the scripts take a bit more time in execution compared to other tools available.

I have been working with Worksoft Certify for almost 11 years since 2014.

I understand that the majority of the automations are stable. From one to ten, I would rate stability for Worksoft Certify around eight out of ten.

I would rate scalability eight regarding the ability to scale and expand.

I rate technical support from Worksoft around six out of ten.

Neutral

In my personal opinion, I prefer Tricentis Tosca when comparing Worksoft Certify and Tricentis Tosca. Many customers prefer Tricentis Tosca over Worksoft depending on their requirements, while some depend on the cost and pricing. As a practitioner of automation tools, I work on multiple automation tools like Panaya, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, accelQ, and others, and we choose the tool based on the customer's requirement. However, I can see improvements going faster in competitive tools compared to Worksoft, which is what they have to improve on.

The initial setup for Worksoft is comparatively simple, and I can say it is around moderate. A person with basic knowledge can start working on Worksoft compared to other automation tools where a lot of knowledge is needed.

Worksoft Certify is deployed on-premises where I was using it, and I think it can be implemented in the cloud as well. I am currently working on the on-premises version combined with Tosca. I confirm that I am currently using Worksoft Certify and Tosca totally on-premises.

Regarding how Worksoft Certify impacts regression cycle time, we have a huge regression suite of around eight thousand plus test cases, and we are able to complete it within two to three days based on the time and duration that the execution happens. Previously, it used to take more than a week, and now it is happening in less than two days. We are trying to achieve it in one day, but as of now, we are doing it in two days.

I would rate the pricing for Worksoft Certify as moderate and competitive, and I do not mark it as high. In my opinion, it is reasonable money for that solution.

Overall, I would say around eight out of ten is my final rating for Worksoft Certify, and definitely there is some room for improvement.

On-premises

Other

The stability is good. Compared with Tosca, the stability is too good, which is why Apple also prefers this tool.

Easy migration is a positive aspect if you're migrated to ECC or HANA or any platform in terms of SAP. If you're working in an ECC platform and migrating to HANA, the migration is too easy in Worksoft Certify.

The stability is good. Compared with Tosca, the stability is too good, which is why Apple also prefers this tool.

Sometimes we are facing crashes and downtime. If we have a license for 10 people, but 12 to 13 people are trying to log in with the same login ID and user password, that is when you can face some downtime due to a license issue. Even our script will terminate in between the execution. Those kinds of issues you will face.

Regarding the current pricing for Worksoft Certify, there are concerns about the overall cost.

Sometimes we are facing crashes and downtime. If we have a license for 10 people, but 12 to 13 people are trying to log in with the same login ID and user password, that is when you can face some downtime due to a license issue. Even our script will terminate in between the execution. Those kinds of issues you will face.

Scalability is fine, and there are no worries about the scalability of Worksoft Certify.

I am a track lead, so our team lead or manager will contact Worksoft Certify administrative support. Sometimes if they are not able to detect an object, they will load an accept definition. An accept definition is a kind of action. They will prepare one accept definition file and send it to Worksoft Certify support. At that time it will read the objects. Sometimes in web-based applications, it is not reading properly. Some objects are not properly detecting. When they are going to detect that object, it is not properly detecting, that is when they will reach out to Worksoft Certify support.

Worksoft Certify maintenance is not required. Worksoft Certify will do some batch works and regular updates on a periodic basis. However, Jenkins requires maintenance. Jenkins will trigger Worksoft Certify, so that is when it will require maintenance. In terms of Worksoft Certify tool, it does not require any kind of maintenance because they will do the updates on a periodic basis.

My rating for SAP automation only would be nine out of ten. If including web-based applications, my rating would be seven out of ten. Since the purpose is to automate SAP as well as web-based applications, my overall rating is eight point five out of ten.

My main use case for Worksoft Certify involves automating end-to-end SAP applications and processes, and I find Worksoft Certify very compatible compared to other software with its code-free approach, making it easy to learn for most users.

An example of an SAP process I've automated using Worksoft Certify includes automating SAP SD workflows as well as MM and WM, where I worked on IDoc related processes by creating a PO and then generating transfer orders and transfer requirements.

In one of the processes we have automated with Worksoft Certify, we've divided an end-to-end process into smaller parts, reusing automation scripts easily, which makes automating very straightforward, as it stores the objects automatically.

The best features Worksoft Certify offers are its codeless nature, the absence of an object repository management requirement, and tools such as SAP Learn and Web Learn that are particularly useful for beginners, alongside the ability to generate various reports based on client requirements.

The feature that has made the biggest impact for me is the codeless automation aspect, which provides comfort not just for SAP applications but also for web applications, making it easier to use compared to UFT and others.

Worksoft Certify has had a positive impact on my organization by enabling multiple people to automate simultaneously, reducing manual efforts significantly, and allowing the automation of diverse applications.

Worksoft Certify should improve its speed to minimize the lagging experienced during test script automation, where delays can cause users to close and reopen scripts entirely.

The points deducted are due to the significant lag experienced when many users are working on it, especially during urgent tasks.

I believe my data is well protected using Worksoft Certify, which also promotes transparency within projects, but there are some security concerns as multiple project teams can view each other's code, which calls for better access rights management.

I have been using Worksoft Certify for the past seven months.

In my experience, Worksoft Certify is not very stable, and many users face crashing issues, particularly during execution, which leads to wasted time and frustration.

Worksoft Certify struggles with scalability and cannot accommodate a large number of users simultaneously, making it less ideal for high-demand situations.

I have needed customer support for Worksoft Certify, and while they respond quickly, there are times when immediate resolutions are not available, causing delays.

I previously used UFT and Selenium for over four years but switched to Worksoft Certify because it feels more modern, user-friendly, and easier to learn.

I estimate that if two people can accomplish tasks in other software in 40 hours, with Worksoft Certify, it reduces that time to about 10 hours, ultimately saving 20 to 30 percent of manual effort and time, but I note that Worksoft Certify can lag and have synchronization issues.

I'm not familiar with pricing, setup costs, and licensing details, but I've heard Worksoft Certify is costly compared to other tools.

I evaluated UFT, Selenium, and some other options, ultimately choosing Worksoft Certify for its accessibility to users with non-coding backgrounds.

Overall, I feel Worksoft Certify is easy to learn and user-friendly, but the crashing and lagging issues need to be resolved for it to be truly effective.

If others are working on Worksoft Certify in a large project, they should use it during off-peak hours to reduce logout issues and lag.

I would advocate purchasing Worksoft Certify if many users will be utilizing it, as it demands investment to save time and improve security features compared to free tools such as Selenium.

I give this product an overall rating of 8 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

I have scripted on Worksoft Certify for web applications and the SAP application. Mostly, I have used it for web applications and rarely for the SAP application. I have scripted 100 to 102 scripts in Worksoft Certify and have scheduled it for whenever I want to test the application, if there are any changes in the application, or if there are any feature updates in our application. I have tested whenever I wanted or when I had new data. I have also maintained the scripts. If there were any changes made in the application, I have updated the scripts and executed them correctly with the new features and functions.

What I appreciate most about Worksoft Certify is that I use LiveTouch primarily. LiveTouch can learn any object in the webpage, which is a feature I value greatly. I also appreciate the WebLearn feature. It will save the object automatically and learn the objects automatically. Both of these features are valuable to me.

What I dislike about Worksoft Certify is that if I have complex web applications or complex requirements, the scripting becomes difficult and the efficiency is also low for complex projects. This is an area that needs improvement.

I have been using Worksoft Certify for four-plus years. 

Regarding stability, in Worksoft Certify, I have not seen any lagging, crashing, or downtime. However, in the CTM and the execution manager, I have seen lagging. In the CTM, when I scheduled the script, it was not executed. When I checked the next day, there was no execution at all.

Worksoft Certify is highly scalable for enterprise automation testing. It supports large environments as well.

I have not contacted technical support.

Regarding contacting support, I have checked Worksoft documentation and Worksoft websites for help. The documentation was helpful to work with.

The installation was easy. It was free to download. There are no configurations required because I can use any system. There is no configuration needed for Java and similar components. With Worksoft Certify, there is no configuration required, so I directly downloaded the application and installed it. It was easier than other tools.

I am not certain about the pricing since my company purchases the license.

Regarding maintenance, I have to check if the license is valid or if it has expired and then pay for the license renewal.

I have not used any alternatives to Worksoft Certify because Worksoft Certify is codeless. With other automation tools, I have to do some coding. With Worksoft Certify, there is no coding required, which is something I appreciate.

It took approximately one hour to fully install Worksoft Certify once I had the license. I would rate this product a 10.

My use cases involve using Worksoft Certify for end-to-end testing for enterprise applications, where I created a test process and I'm checking the application health.

What I appreciate most about Worksoft Certify is that it is easy to learn and very user-friendly; you do not need to put any coding, but you need to understand some basic coding for data. Other than that, it is very user-friendly.

Worksoft Certify can do better in several areas. You can only make functional testing, but you cannot test performance testing. Also, you can test the user experience, but sometimes an application has a color change, such as blue means something and yellow means something, but you cannot make any decision because of the color on the user interface. It would be great if they added something related to color or performance testing.

I have been working with Worksoft Certify for three and a half years.

I have seen lagging, crashing, or downtime; sometimes it results in a frozen screen and crashing, and I need to close the application and relaunch it again.

I think the scalability of Worksoft Certify is very good, and I do not have a complaint about that part.

I did contact their technical support about various issues.

I find that the quality and the speed of the support are very fast and very proactive.

I have not used any alternatives to Worksoft Certify, as this is my first experience with codeless automation.

Regarding the pricing of Worksoft Certify, I do not know the actual pricing, but the company gets it as a per-license, per-user basis. I do not know the inside information, but I got the feeling that it is not a cheap tool; it is a bit pricey.

Learning how to use Worksoft Certify is not that difficult; it is more of a moderate, regular technical tool. You need to understand the basic concept and then you need to get experience. You need to build a small project and then you need to move to a complex project, step by step.

Some parts of Worksoft Certify need maintenance on my end, for example, database cleanup; it requires that.

My overall review rating for Worksoft Certify is 7.

We automate SAP applications and SAP Fiori using Worksoft Certify. We perform automation for SAP Fiori with simple test cases, such as creation of sales orders and STOs. We primarily focus on web application automation.

The record sets in Worksoft Certify are my favorite feature. They are very flexible for our needs.

I have tried using the Business Capture feature in Worksoft Certify. I think Business Capture is the first step or the basic step to build scripting. It is somewhat easy to capture the objects and to build the scripts. It is somewhat helpful. Similarly, we have XScan in Tosca, which is a scanning tool. It will be very helpful in the scripting and development parts.

The downside of Worksoft Certify is related to loops and conditions. It is somewhat complex compared to other tools I have worked with. If I want to implement some conditions, it looks somewhat complex to me. Perhaps it is because of my experience with Certify, but I faced some difficulty in building the conditions. When creating multiple test cases using the libraries with the same data, instead of building multiple test cases, we can use the record set, which is fine. However, if you want to use conditions, such as if-else loops or while loops in the RTBs, it looks somewhat difficult. That is what I remember.

In my four years in my career, I used Worksoft Certify for one year, and then one year back, I used it for another year.

I have not seen any stability issues. It is a good tool.

For the scalability aspect of Worksoft Certify, I would rate it four out of five. You can scale.

Most of the things would be handed over by my lead when it comes to contacting the technical support or customer support.

Neutral

I have used Tosca, which is somewhat similar to Worksoft Certify as a no-coding, scanning-based tool.

I worked more on Tosca, which is the reason I favor it more. Tosca is my favorite compared to Worksoft Certify.

Deployment of Worksoft Certify is somewhat easy. I came in the middle of the project, so I am not aware of the details about the deployment. We use Azure for the test management tool. I am not sure about all the specifics. It is somewhat easy once I learned everything. Theoretically, it is easy.

Worksoft Certify itself will take leadership for the maintenance.

I have not used any AI-powered test prioritization or AI-powered tools within Certify. I did not get that good an amount of opportunity. In the early part of my project, I did only executions. Then after about six months, I started scripting. It was a support project, so I did not get a chance to explore everything.

To be honest, I did not recall everything about the Continuous Testing Manager in Worksoft Certify. It has been a one-year gap, and I worked on multiple automations. All the knowledge is fading. My overall review rating for this product is eight out of ten.

Microsoft Azure

I use Worksoft Certify as a product for testing software through automation. In real life, I have been using this for testing in SAP, and in various modules in SAP, I use Worksoft Certify for testing through automation.

Compared with my previous experience of working with Selenium, Java, and Playwright, I found a very good feature in Worksoft Certify where I don't need to change the XPaths. If it is a static web page, we don't need to change everything; it would be constant. However, when it comes to dynamic pages, we keep on changing the XPaths and all. In Worksoft Certify, we least use the XPaths for object recognition. I found Worksoft Certify to be the best tool for object recognition.

The execution time which is happening with Worksoft Certify is a bit low compared to Playwright and all. That is one thing I have found as a little discomfort. When compared, it is comparatively less, but it is good to use. Apart from that, everything is good.

I have been using this solution for more than 10 months.

I did not experience lagging, crashing, or downtime. When I joined, the latest version was released and we received it with all the stable version. I cannot answer definitively, but I did not face crash issues.

Worksoft Certify is scalable with cross-browser capabilities and is more scalable with any kind of platforms.

I did not contact the technical support or customer support of Worksoft during this span of time. Everything was fine when I was working with it. However, there is a dedicated Worksoft support team who are working 24/7 with shifts and handle everything. Whenever a customer needs support, they will contact them and resolve the issues.

I have not used alternatives myself, but the different ones I have used are Playwright and Selenium with Java.

When it comes to installation, Worksoft Certify is very easy and user-friendly. Anyone can easily install it and make use of it. In other parts, we need to install so many libraries, files, and we need to set up pathways, etc. In Worksoft Certify, it would be easy.

Selenium with Java and Playwright are the open-source automation tools that are free of cost. However, Worksoft Certify is a paid tool. The customer needs to purchase Worksoft Certify to utilize it, as there will be a license. First of all, we need to purchase the license to make use of the product.

I have been working at my current company in my current role for nearly 10 months, so I have been working with Worksoft Certify since I started with this company only. I would have appreciated more information about the organization and how it works, including whether it is a startup or an organization that has been around for a long time, and whether the organization only conducts research and provides reviews about companies or covers other topics such as career paths. My overall review rating for this product is 9 out of 10.

My current use case for Worksoft Certify is mainly for test automation with SAP.

Worksoft Certify helps in reducing regression cycle time because manual testing takes substantial time and can lead to errors. With Worksoft Certify, it will definitely help reduce resources as time and ROI will also increase.

I have used Continuous Testing Manager (CTM) to run some tests, and it is based on lights-out testing, which helps significantly with overnight execution. CTM is effective for managing the testing process because it is helpful; you don't have to sit in front of the machine and see the execution, as you can schedule the executions and see the results.

Worksoft Certify is a no-code tool that works effectively with SAP, and I appreciate all the features compared to other tools.

Teams who are planning for automation and are still in manual testing can use Worksoft Certify, and significant time and resources will be reduced.

Reporting for Worksoft Certify is also excellent; we have the BPP reports customized, and recently WRS has been implemented, so all these features are beneficial.

If any AI-powered features are included, that would be great. We've already seen the beginning of self-healing capabilities, but additional integrations with AI would be beneficial. Focusing more on AI and its integration with Worksoft would really help enhance our processes.

I have been working with Worksoft Certify for more than 12 years.

For stability, I would rate Worksoft Certify a nine out of ten.

For scalability, I would rate it as the best.

I would rate their technical support a nine out ten. I am satisfied with it.

Positive

The setup process for Worksoft Certify is quite easy; it requires just installation to use it. I have worked in many different environments, including both on-premises and cloud options such as AWS.

We purchased Worksoft Certify through a partner because we are a vendor.

I would rate the pricing for the product as reasonable. As it is a quality tool, the price is slightly higher, but that is acceptable compared to other tools, especially considering the ROI.

I can compare Worksoft Certify with Selenium, as we need to write code in Selenium but not in Worksoft Certify, and other tools such as Katalon Studio can also be compared with Worksoft Certify.

Overall, I would rate Worksoft Certify a nine out of ten.