Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank
Real User
Top 10
2024-11-28T07:15:00Z
Nov 28, 2024
I recommend using Bitbucket Server for Java-based development due to its effective management features. However, for Microsoft projects, GitHub might provide better integration due to its ecosystem. Overall, I rate Bitbucket Server as eight out of ten due to its compelling features and flexibility.
The solution's integration with Jira is excellent, making it highly effective for teams using both tools. It has certainly made things easier regarding accessibility and usability. Overall, I don't recommend Bitbucket. I would suggest alternatives like Gerrit or GitHub. I rate it a five out of ten.
Either use Bitbucket alongside the rest of the Atlassian suite or invest significantly more admin time into syncing it than with other products. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
The features I found to be the most valuable in the product for code collaboration stem from the fact that the tool provides webhooks, which are very beneficial for triggering jobs in Jenkins when dealing with new commits, Git push, and Git merge. Speaking about how the tool's pull request functionality impacted my company's code review process, I would say that when a pull request is created, it goes to the technical team leader and PO. After my company gets comments from the tech lead or PO, the pull request will be merged with the targeted branch. The integration capabilities of the product are good since it can integrate with multiple products. The product is easy to maintain. I recommend the product to others who plan to use it. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.
Bitbucket significantly improves our code review and collaboration processes by providing private repositories as a default feature. This specific feature was not available in GitHub at the time of our selection. We utilize a standard Gitflow with feature branches, including branches like bugfixes, hotfixes, and more. It makes the request mechanism easy to use. Its integration capabilities with other tools have been useful. However, the integration with Slack needs improvement. It provides satisfactory performance and scalability for our site. I recommend it to others and rate it a nine out of ten.
The product is good, but its features are limited. It is a good choice if the requirement is solely to manage source code. It handles source code management, providing stable check-in and check-out functionality and features like comments and tagging. You can set permissions at the project level, repository level, or branch level. Project-level permissions apply to all branches and repositories within the project. Repository-level permissions are specific to the branches within that repository. I rate it a seven out of ten. The solution can easily integrate with Jira and other Atlassian products.
Quality Assuarance Lead at a marketing services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
2024-01-12T06:35:49Z
Jan 12, 2024
I am open to exploring other products because while Bitbucket Server does the job, there are better tools in the market that I need to explore. Overall, I rate Bitbucket Server a five out of ten.
We have moved the task management to Jira. We use Jira to define all the necessary tasks properly and do the necessary monitoring. We allow access to our customers only to review issues. Teams that need to perform DevOps tasks using Bitbucket must buy the premium subscription. The free edition has a limited number of users and features. We will not be able to utilize its capabilities fully. Overall, I rate the tool a ten out of ten.
My suggestion to those planning to buy the solution is to use the product to its full extent since it is a strong and stable product. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.
Dynamic Engineering Manager at Leidos Holdings Inc.
Vendor
2021-12-17T08:37:00Z
Dec 17, 2021
Atlassian tools seem to use Log4j quite a bit, and they should get away from it because of the recent security issues that have happened in the last few days. I rate Bitbucket Server a six out of ten.
DevOps Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-04-03T08:34:05Z
Apr 3, 2021
If anybody was considering this tool, I would be expecting that they would really evaluate it and know what the functionalities are ahead of time. There are other tools that are similar, so make sure to look at everything available in that space and make sure it fits their needs. I would rate Bitbuck Server an eight out of ten.
Bitbucket Server offers seamless integrations with tools like Jira and Jenkins, a user-friendly interface, and robust code collaboration features. It's known for excellent development support, scalability, and high availability, making it a preferred choice for many technical teams.Bitbucket Server stands out due to its flexibility in workflows and ability to manage branching and code integration. It supports pull requests, private repositories, and is easy to manage on servers. Integration...
I recommend using Bitbucket Server for Java-based development due to its effective management features. However, for Microsoft projects, GitHub might provide better integration due to its ecosystem. Overall, I rate Bitbucket Server as eight out of ten due to its compelling features and flexibility.
The solution's integration with Jira is excellent, making it highly effective for teams using both tools. It has certainly made things easier regarding accessibility and usability. Overall, I don't recommend Bitbucket. I would suggest alternatives like Gerrit or GitHub. I rate it a five out of ten.
If you're going to use a version control system, Bitbucket Server is a good choice. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Overall, the solution is a robust and reliable tool for code management. I rate it a nine out of ten.
Either use Bitbucket alongside the rest of the Atlassian suite or invest significantly more admin time into syncing it than with other products. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
The features I found to be the most valuable in the product for code collaboration stem from the fact that the tool provides webhooks, which are very beneficial for triggering jobs in Jenkins when dealing with new commits, Git push, and Git merge. Speaking about how the tool's pull request functionality impacted my company's code review process, I would say that when a pull request is created, it goes to the technical team leader and PO. After my company gets comments from the tech lead or PO, the pull request will be merged with the targeted branch. The integration capabilities of the product are good since it can integrate with multiple products. The product is easy to maintain. I recommend the product to others who plan to use it. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.
Bitbucket significantly improves our code review and collaboration processes by providing private repositories as a default feature. This specific feature was not available in GitHub at the time of our selection. We utilize a standard Gitflow with feature branches, including branches like bugfixes, hotfixes, and more. It makes the request mechanism easy to use. Its integration capabilities with other tools have been useful. However, the integration with Slack needs improvement. It provides satisfactory performance and scalability for our site. I recommend it to others and rate it a nine out of ten.
The product is good, but its features are limited. It is a good choice if the requirement is solely to manage source code. It handles source code management, providing stable check-in and check-out functionality and features like comments and tagging. You can set permissions at the project level, repository level, or branch level. Project-level permissions apply to all branches and repositories within the project. Repository-level permissions are specific to the branches within that repository. I rate it a seven out of ten. The solution can easily integrate with Jira and other Atlassian products.
I am open to exploring other products because while Bitbucket Server does the job, there are better tools in the market that I need to explore. Overall, I rate Bitbucket Server a five out of ten.
We have moved the task management to Jira. We use Jira to define all the necessary tasks properly and do the necessary monitoring. We allow access to our customers only to review issues. Teams that need to perform DevOps tasks using Bitbucket must buy the premium subscription. The free edition has a limited number of users and features. We will not be able to utilize its capabilities fully. Overall, I rate the tool a ten out of ten.
I rate Bitbucket Server a nine out of ten.
I believe it's a valuable tool for developers to quickly set up and use packages. I would rate it nine out of ten.
I would recommend it as it serves as an excellent platform for code maintenance. I would rate it eight out of ten.
My suggestion to those planning to buy the solution is to use the product to its full extent since it is a strong and stable product. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.
Atlassian tools seem to use Log4j quite a bit, and they should get away from it because of the recent security issues that have happened in the last few days. I rate Bitbucket Server a six out of ten.
If anybody was considering this tool, I would be expecting that they would really evaluate it and know what the functionalities are ahead of time. There are other tools that are similar, so make sure to look at everything available in that space and make sure it fits their needs. I would rate Bitbuck Server an eight out of ten.