We are using it for cloud infrastructure. The integration with IT infrastructure is seamless based on our experience. We are not using Unified Management features such as FC and FCoE. The price should be competitive with other OEMs, and a more flexible pricing model could be beneficial for users. Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers can be recommended for all verticals: small, medium, and large enterprises. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution an 8.
Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Nov 9, 2023
I advise you to check the documentation. Cisco has very detailed documentation for each solution. You can find an installation guide, solution guide, and end-user guide. The installation or implementation process is very easy after the technical documentation, specifically with UCS servers. Also, check the engineer’s knowledge about Hypervisor for the virtualizations in the server. The UCS server has a Linux operating system, but you must deploy Hypervisor. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Learn what your peers think about Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
I would recommend them as long as they have the budget for it, but exploring other options is also worthwhile. Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. In terms of the product itself, I don't think they need to add any features. However, they could improve the delivery charge and technical support price.
I give the solution an eight out of ten. We did not see a return on our investment, so afterward we questioned whether it would have been wiser to go with Dell or HPE, as they had offered cheaper options. To my knowledge, HPE has had performance issues in the past. We did consider this before making our decision. For organizations that are already utilizing Cisco racks, the solution will work great, otherwise, I recommend exploring other options.
Embedded system and Iot developer intern at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG
Real User
Jan 16, 2023
I would recommend this solution to others. However, my management wonders why we choose such a high-priced solution when we need to purchase third-party solutions to have cloud capabilities. I rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers an eight out of ten.
Pre-Sales Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Oct 26, 2022
The intersite options for management make life easier for the operations and management teams because it's a single point of management for the whole server infrastructure. I rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers an eight out of ten.
I give the solution an eight out of ten. The solution can be implemented by one person in a couple of hours. We currently have 1000 people using the solution. I recommend the solution to others.
I rate Cisco USC C-Series Rack Servers 10 out 10. If you plan to buy a C-Series, you should be clear about why you want to use it because the uses vary. different. Whether you're using Cisco, HPE, Dell or any other brand, it's essential to define your use case. For example, are you using it for a simulation graphics, calculations, etc.? Depending on the use case, you might want to go with a small server with more CPU. Sometimes you need a light CPU with a powerful GPU. For example, if we have a C-Series with four CPUs at the same time, or we have a server that's handled two CPUs at the same time—the purpose is crucial. C-Series is good enough compared to other competitors like HPE and the other ones. The HPE C20 is one unit and has a lot of RAM support, but the C-series is number one, in my opinion.
Senior Information Technology Manager at a construction company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Feb 22, 2022
The solution has a very high-level computer and can be a benefit. I had some issues with hard drive failures but I believe the newer version is better. I rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers a six out of ten.
Pure Storage at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Dec 8, 2021
I would rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers a nine out of ten. It did what it said it would do. It was simple to install and has given us no problems.
Post-sales manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Oct 19, 2021
I still use the solution, installing it and providing support for clients. The solution is not deployed in my organization, but in those of my clients. I can't think of any features which need to be added to the solution. All of them are good. I rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers as a nine out of ten.
We're just customers and end-users. We don't have a business relationship with Cisco. I'd recommend the solution. We've been quite happy with its capabilities so far. I'd rate the solution, on a scale from one to ten, at a nine. It's been pretty seamless in terms of usage. I have no real complaints.
Implementation and Support Engineer at PRACSO S.R.L.
Real User
May 25, 2021
I would recommend this solution to others because it saves a lot of space and it's very scalable. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine.
We do not deal with the latest version because we find that for rack servers, the previous version is a little better. Manageability is not a big option for this type of server. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
I don't have any problems with the Cisco UC series. It serves its purpose. I think their products are good. The only thing Cisco needs to work on is the cost part. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers an eight.
I would definitely recommend this solution. When you hear the brand Cisco, you don't really need to recommend it. For me, it is the number one brand for network devices and servers. Cisco is always there in Gartner Magic Quadrant. I would rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers a nine out of ten. They just need the ability to be managed on the cloud.
UCS C-Series Rack Servers deliver unified computing in an industry-standard form factor to reduce TCO and increase agility. Each server addresses varying workload challenges through a balance of processing, memory, I/O, and internal storage resources.
I would strongly recommend Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers to others.
We are using it for cloud infrastructure. The integration with IT infrastructure is seamless based on our experience. We are not using Unified Management features such as FC and FCoE. The price should be competitive with other OEMs, and a more flexible pricing model could be beneficial for users. Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers can be recommended for all verticals: small, medium, and large enterprises. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution an 8.
I would rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.
I advise you to check the documentation. Cisco has very detailed documentation for each solution. You can find an installation guide, solution guide, and end-user guide. The installation or implementation process is very easy after the technical documentation, specifically with UCS servers. Also, check the engineer’s knowledge about Hypervisor for the virtualizations in the server. The UCS server has a Linux operating system, but you must deploy Hypervisor. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.
Compared to HPE and Dell, the commercial aspect of the product is on the higher side. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
I would recommend them as long as they have the budget for it, but exploring other options is also worthwhile. Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. In terms of the product itself, I don't think they need to add any features. However, they could improve the delivery charge and technical support price.
I would rate the product a ten out of ten.
I give the solution an eight out of ten. We did not see a return on our investment, so afterward we questioned whether it would have been wiser to go with Dell or HPE, as they had offered cheaper options. To my knowledge, HPE has had performance issues in the past. We did consider this before making our decision. For organizations that are already utilizing Cisco racks, the solution will work great, otherwise, I recommend exploring other options.
I would recommend this solution to others. However, my management wonders why we choose such a high-priced solution when we need to purchase third-party solutions to have cloud capabilities. I rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers an eight out of ten.
The intersite options for management make life easier for the operations and management teams because it's a single point of management for the whole server infrastructure. I rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers an eight out of ten.
I give the solution an eight out of ten. The solution can be implemented by one person in a couple of hours. We currently have 1000 people using the solution. I recommend the solution to others.
I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten.
In summary, this is a good product and it's sustainable. We have had no issues with these servers. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Our clients have enjoyed the solutions. I rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers an eight out of ten. There is always room and scope for improvement.
I rate Cisco USC C-Series Rack Servers 10 out 10. If you plan to buy a C-Series, you should be clear about why you want to use it because the uses vary. different. Whether you're using Cisco, HPE, Dell or any other brand, it's essential to define your use case. For example, are you using it for a simulation graphics, calculations, etc.? Depending on the use case, you might want to go with a small server with more CPU. Sometimes you need a light CPU with a powerful GPU. For example, if we have a C-Series with four CPUs at the same time, or we have a server that's handled two CPUs at the same time—the purpose is crucial. C-Series is good enough compared to other competitors like HPE and the other ones. The HPE C20 is one unit and has a lot of RAM support, but the C-series is number one, in my opinion.
The solution has a very high-level computer and can be a benefit. I had some issues with hard drive failures but I believe the newer version is better. I rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers a six out of ten.
I would rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers a nine out of ten. It did what it said it would do. It was simple to install and has given us no problems.
I still use the solution, installing it and providing support for clients. The solution is not deployed in my organization, but in those of my clients. I can't think of any features which need to be added to the solution. All of them are good. I rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers as a nine out of ten.
We're just customers and end-users. We don't have a business relationship with Cisco. I'd recommend the solution. We've been quite happy with its capabilities so far. I'd rate the solution, on a scale from one to ten, at a nine. It's been pretty seamless in terms of usage. I have no real complaints.
I would recommend this solution to others because it saves a lot of space and it's very scalable. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine.
This is a good product and I recommend it. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
I would definitely recommend this solution. We plan to keep using this solution. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
We do not deal with the latest version because we find that for rack servers, the previous version is a little better. Manageability is not a big option for this type of server. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
I don't have any problems with the Cisco UC series. It serves its purpose. I think their products are good. The only thing Cisco needs to work on is the cost part. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers an eight.
I would definitely recommend this solution. When you hear the brand Cisco, you don't really need to recommend it. For me, it is the number one brand for network devices and servers. Cisco is always there in Gartner Magic Quadrant. I would rate Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers a nine out of ten. They just need the ability to be managed on the cloud.