Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Jun 24, 2026
My advice for those looking at Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is to compare your use case comprehensively. Do not just rely on reviews, as they offer communal insight; evaluate from a technical perspective and consider the stability of your infrastructure and how well it aligns with your operational needs moving forward. Be thorough in understanding the features that other users find critical and ensure they align with your specific requirements. I give this review an overall rating of eight out of ten.
All functionality is performing well. There has been a reduction in phishing events. I would rate Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection an eight out of ten because sometimes it blocks or holds emails that are supposed to be unblocked. Occasionally, Mimecast does not work as effectively, which is the reason for this rating.
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection provides behavioral pattern analysis and gives me a centralized alert. It helps me maintain less headcount for security engineers. It saves time and cost. The accuracy of Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection detection is highly impressive because it moves away from rigid keyword matching and examines the true behavioral context. By utilizing over two hundred fifty built-in risk indicators, it successfully separates everyday employees' collaboration from actual malicious exfiltration. For example, it tracks when the file extension is renamed or when an unusual large volume of files is moved to a personal cloud browser tab, giving the alert high fidelity. In terms of reliability, the endpoint agent is incredibly lightweight and stable. It operates silently across both Windows and macOS setups with almost zero performance impact, ensuring it does not slow down employees' machines or crash. The system is highly dependable. I give this product a review rating of nine out of ten.
My advice for others looking into using Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is to evaluate it, and if it fits your needs, it is a good solution. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.
Incident Response Officer at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Mar 23, 2023
If you come with the perception that this solution uses the same policies that are used in traditional DLP products, you might find Code42 doesn't work for you. You have to adapt to their philosophy, which is a more open-ended solution. If you're looking at getting granular about a particular type of data, it becomes harder to put custom variables in there. Code42 is more open-ended and identifies or discovers data that is going out rather than having someone build a policy to filter for it. If you're willing to look at DLP and data leakage from a different perspective then I'd go with 42. I rate this solution eight out of 10.
Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Jun 16, 2022
The very first thing you should do is make sure that you know exactly what you're looking for. There's a whole bunch of stuff out there. Data loss prevention or data loss protection is a big category. It can cover a lot of ground, but you have to make sure that you know what you want, and you have to prioritize that list. We call it a value-based prioritized roadmap. You have to know what you want and what's critical for you at that point in time. Don't try and do everything all at once. Give yourself the top three things that you want to accomplish within a certain timeframe and work toward those. Spend your time on those. Don't get off track because it is easy to get off track with new features and all that. You should just stick to the plan and work it through. So, definitely make sure that you have a priority list of what functionality and what services you're actually interested in. I would rate it a solid ten out of ten. We've been very happy with it. It covers a lot of space and is very scalable. They have good people to work with. It is a little pricey, but you get what you pay for. We find it a pretty straightforward application to work with. We've been able to leverage it to help improve our policies. It is a good tool.
Learn what your peers think about Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.
We're just a customer. We don't have a business relationship with the product. I'm not sure as to which version of the solution we're using at this time. It's just an all-around good product to have in your organization. The product works best for smaller companies. However, larger ones may be able to benefit as well. On a scale from one to ten, I'd rate this solution at a perfect ten. We've been very happy with it and it hasn't given us any problems.
Mimecast Incydr protects organizations against insider risk and data exfiltration, whether accidental, negligent, or malicious. It monitors endpoint, cloud, browser, and email activity to see when files move to places you don't trust, without requiring policies, proxies, or content classification to work. Administrators get a single dashboard for data flow visibility, adaptive controls ranging from education to blocking, and integrations with HR, endpoint detection, and identity systems to...
My advice for those looking at Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is to compare your use case comprehensively. Do not just rely on reviews, as they offer communal insight; evaluate from a technical perspective and consider the stability of your infrastructure and how well it aligns with your operational needs moving forward. Be thorough in understanding the features that other users find critical and ensure they align with your specific requirements. I give this review an overall rating of eight out of ten.
All functionality is performing well. There has been a reduction in phishing events. I would rate Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection an eight out of ten because sometimes it blocks or holds emails that are supposed to be unblocked. Occasionally, Mimecast does not work as effectively, which is the reason for this rating.
Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection provides behavioral pattern analysis and gives me a centralized alert. It helps me maintain less headcount for security engineers. It saves time and cost. The accuracy of Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection detection is highly impressive because it moves away from rigid keyword matching and examines the true behavioral context. By utilizing over two hundred fifty built-in risk indicators, it successfully separates everyday employees' collaboration from actual malicious exfiltration. For example, it tracks when the file extension is renamed or when an unusual large volume of files is moved to a personal cloud browser tab, giving the alert high fidelity. In terms of reliability, the endpoint agent is incredibly lightweight and stable. It operates silently across both Windows and macOS setups with almost zero performance impact, ensuring it does not slow down employees' machines or crash. The system is highly dependable. I give this product a review rating of nine out of ten.
My advice for others looking into using Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is to evaluate it, and if it fits your needs, it is a good solution. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.
If you come with the perception that this solution uses the same policies that are used in traditional DLP products, you might find Code42 doesn't work for you. You have to adapt to their philosophy, which is a more open-ended solution. If you're looking at getting granular about a particular type of data, it becomes harder to put custom variables in there. Code42 is more open-ended and identifies or discovers data that is going out rather than having someone build a policy to filter for it. If you're willing to look at DLP and data leakage from a different perspective then I'd go with 42. I rate this solution eight out of 10.
The very first thing you should do is make sure that you know exactly what you're looking for. There's a whole bunch of stuff out there. Data loss prevention or data loss protection is a big category. It can cover a lot of ground, but you have to make sure that you know what you want, and you have to prioritize that list. We call it a value-based prioritized roadmap. You have to know what you want and what's critical for you at that point in time. Don't try and do everything all at once. Give yourself the top three things that you want to accomplish within a certain timeframe and work toward those. Spend your time on those. Don't get off track because it is easy to get off track with new features and all that. You should just stick to the plan and work it through. So, definitely make sure that you have a priority list of what functionality and what services you're actually interested in. I would rate it a solid ten out of ten. We've been very happy with it. It covers a lot of space and is very scalable. They have good people to work with. It is a little pricey, but you get what you pay for. We find it a pretty straightforward application to work with. We've been able to leverage it to help improve our policies. It is a good tool.
We're just a customer. We don't have a business relationship with the product. I'm not sure as to which version of the solution we're using at this time. It's just an all-around good product to have in your organization. The product works best for smaller companies. However, larger ones may be able to benefit as well. On a scale from one to ten, I'd rate this solution at a perfect ten. We've been very happy with it and it hasn't given us any problems.