Overall, I rate Google Cloud Storage Nearline as eight out of ten. The solution is beneficial for anyone dealing with infrequent data access needs, ensuring backups at optimal cost and high availability.
Overall, Google Cloud Storage Nearline is a solid solution within Google ecosystem, which is why I rate it seven out of ten. Enhancements in documentation and user guides, along with more competitive pricing, could elevate its standing.
I would recommend it because it is a service that offers specific advantages. When you opt for Google Cloud Storage Nearline, you're making a deliberate choice for long-term data storage. You're aware that the data you're storing there won't be accessed frequently. Unlike some other cloud storage platforms, it is more like an all-in-one solution. It is a reliable choice for managing your data storage needs within the broader context of cloud storage services. I would rate it seven out of ten.
I would tell anybody who wants to use this solution that this service has multiple features like integration with other advanced technological services like AI, machine learning, analytics, and advanced analytics, but at a higher cost compared to other services. So they have to consider the cost and the features it provides. If the two balance out or if it works for their pocket, they can go for it. Overall, I would rate Google Cloud Storage Nearline an eight out of ten.
Learn what your peers think about Google Cloud Storage Nearline. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
In terms of using Google, we cannot go too far into the firewall and therefore are only using the basic Google cloud right now. We've done some contracts with AWS as well, and, compared to AWS, it's a different way of implementing the infrastructure to the services. Is it better? I'm not sure. It's just a matter of how much knowledge and comfort a user has with the solution. Right now, we'd rather go with Google. It's cheaper for the same quality of services. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
A low-cost, highly-durable and highly available storage service for infrequently accessed data, data archiving, online backup and disaster recovery. Data is available instantly, not within hours or days. With sub-second average response times and 1 cent per GB/month pricing, Cloud Storage Nearline gives you terrific performance at a low cost.
Overall, I rate Google Cloud Storage Nearline as eight out of ten. The solution is beneficial for anyone dealing with infrequent data access needs, ensuring backups at optimal cost and high availability.
Overall, Google Cloud Storage Nearline is a solid solution within Google ecosystem, which is why I rate it seven out of ten. Enhancements in documentation and user guides, along with more competitive pricing, could elevate its standing.
I would recommend using and exploring the solution. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I would recommend it because it is a service that offers specific advantages. When you opt for Google Cloud Storage Nearline, you're making a deliberate choice for long-term data storage. You're aware that the data you're storing there won't be accessed frequently. Unlike some other cloud storage platforms, it is more like an all-in-one solution. It is a reliable choice for managing your data storage needs within the broader context of cloud storage services. I would rate it seven out of ten.
I would tell anybody who wants to use this solution that this service has multiple features like integration with other advanced technological services like AI, machine learning, analytics, and advanced analytics, but at a higher cost compared to other services. So they have to consider the cost and the features it provides. If the two balance out or if it works for their pocket, they can go for it. Overall, I would rate Google Cloud Storage Nearline an eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate Google Cloud Storage Nearline an eight out of ten.
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
I would rate Nearline nine out of 10.
In terms of using Google, we cannot go too far into the firewall and therefore are only using the basic Google cloud right now. We've done some contracts with AWS as well, and, compared to AWS, it's a different way of implementing the infrastructure to the services. Is it better? I'm not sure. It's just a matter of how much knowledge and comfort a user has with the solution. Right now, we'd rather go with Google. It's cheaper for the same quality of services. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
It's my first time using a cloud solution. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. I'd rate it higher but I find the pricing ridiculous.