Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management shows material impacts on security. For example, if we scan a UPI server from Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management agent, it will show that if we are not going to update that UPI server, that UPI hardware, or that application, going forward, it will be risky to us. Anyone, even a small hacker, can exploit your server, lose your data, collect your data, and misuse it in a black market. Every parameter, small to small and high to high, each and every parameter Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management identifies and shows in an alert way, functioning as a monitoring tool also. It shows the severity. If we are not going to close this vulnerability, then what will happen. Severity is there also. There are severity five, four, three, two, and one. If the severity is five, it is most critical, and that vulnerability needs to be closed as soon as possible. In the current place where I work, they have their own infrastructure with multiple servers. We usually get a monthly report of vulnerabilities. The vulnerability count around monthly is approximately twenty thousand, thirty thousand, or more every month. We get a report from the Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management department showing what the vulnerabilities are. We need to find out the most potential vulnerability. Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management shows that the most important things are operating system related criticality, application related, and third-party application related vulnerabilities. It aggregates the most potential criticality in a severity. Severity means how critical this vulnerability is. There are numbers from one to five, with five being the most critical vulnerability. When we get a report, there is a column as a criticality tier. We usually filter it out with tier five, so all the vulnerabilities that are the most potential come up. For example, if I filter out with the five-tier, it usually shows around the most potential vulnerability count of one thousand or two thousand. This is not only for one server. We manage around eight hundred to nine hundred servers. We get a report every month for all servers' vulnerabilities, and it is approximately thirty thousand plus. It shows each and every potential critical vulnerability. We found two or three for each server. If we want to patch or deploy that vulnerability on each server, we need to take downtime. We have limitations to patch the servers each day. For example, in one day, we can patch fifty servers. If we want to patch five hundred servers, within ten days, we close that potential vulnerability by taking downtime as per the scheduled time. Mostly we take downtime at night for the deployment and patching those vulnerabilities. Once we complete our side patching, as per the Patch Tuesday schedule when Microsoft releases their patches and security patches every second Tuesday, we do patches and close the vulnerability with the remedies Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management shows you. After patching, we take a report and share with the security team that we have closed this vulnerability and kindly scan the servers for rescanning. After patching, we take a reboot, and then after reboot, we rescan the system. We ensure everything is as per the expectation or not, and we verify if the vulnerability is closed or not. We rescan all the systems, and after rescan, it shows the previous vulnerabilities are closed in our scanned system. Confidence comes when we do practical validation. If due to some vulnerabilities or some bugs or some loopholes, attackers attack the servers and successfully collect the data, we do the root cause analysis to understand why the server got compromised or data got compromised. In that case, we learn that the particular server has not been patched since the last one month, two months, or three months. Due to that, till now, this kind of attack has not happened in our infrastructure because we make sure that every month patches should be deployed on that particular server within one month, thirty days. It prevents the situation in which if Microsoft releases one security patch with some enhancement in security, we deploy that. It is not that a particular patch has total one hundred percent security enhancement. Every patch has a loophole and security enhancement both things. If we patch the system and after then, attackers will try to find out the loophole in that particular patch. But once they find the loophole, before that, the second patch will be released by Microsoft, and the second patch will be deployed on that particular server by the patching team. This is how all things work. The attacker will not get enough time. That is why monthly patching is most necessary. We call it patching or vulnerability management. Monitoring tools such as Zabbix provide real-time or active monitoring. Zabbix alerts provide alerts in different colors and criticality. For example, if there is one system that uses one hundred percent CPU utilization or memory usage, or disk space issue, these kinds of real environment monitoring will show. If you search some websites on Google, sometimes that website takes a long time to be visible on your device. That happens due to latency, and latency happens due to high memory utilization or RAM utilization. It is the time travel between the sender and receiver. When you send the request to the server, the server will give a response to you. The latency depends on read and write data. Zabbix is used for that. It enhances user experience, prevents downtime, and provides latest alerts. It monitors each and everything. My overall review rating for Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management is eight out of ten.
I speak a little English. I have experience with Check Point solutions and Microsoft solutions. I have a little experience with the product portfolio of Check Point, as I have worked with this brand in a product manager commercial profile. I sold a project two years ago about Check Point Harmony SASE or SASE product. In the last twelve months with Check Point, I have experience with the firewalls and Harmony Email, but not with SASE. With the Maestro lines, I have experience, but not with Quantum Force, as I have worked with Maestro and Harmony Email. With CrowdStrike, I have a little experience, something about five months. I have worked with Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management and VMDR. In the cybersecurity view, I understand what is being said. I cannot understand the TrueConfirm capability or tool. I am not familiar with the term TrueConfirm for threat enrichment capability. Qualys is a reliable tool. It is beneficial so far because the market today needs to protect all these factors that use AI for taking confidential information from the company. My profile is more commercial, but I know about the deployment of these tools being easy for companies to be prepared for this; however, a good assessment is necessary to review the architecture of the customer for a good chronogram and good time for the development of these tools. For this tool, we do not need cloud deployment because it requires some server and deployment from the endpoints of the company, so I do not have this technical knowledge. Qualys has a good price for the benefits of the development of this tool. My overall rating for this review is nine out of ten.
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, CrowdStrike, Tenable and others in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). Updated: February 2026.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management enhances cybersecurity by continuously identifying, assessing, and remedying vulnerabilities to protect against evolving threats. It integrates seamlessly into an organization’s existing infrastructure, providing ongoing security improvements.CTEM proactively monitors potential threats and facilitates swift responses, reducing the risk of breaches. It allows organizations to prioritize threats based on severity and impact, thereby optimizing resource...
Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management shows material impacts on security. For example, if we scan a UPI server from Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management agent, it will show that if we are not going to update that UPI server, that UPI hardware, or that application, going forward, it will be risky to us. Anyone, even a small hacker, can exploit your server, lose your data, collect your data, and misuse it in a black market. Every parameter, small to small and high to high, each and every parameter Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management identifies and shows in an alert way, functioning as a monitoring tool also. It shows the severity. If we are not going to close this vulnerability, then what will happen. Severity is there also. There are severity five, four, three, two, and one. If the severity is five, it is most critical, and that vulnerability needs to be closed as soon as possible. In the current place where I work, they have their own infrastructure with multiple servers. We usually get a monthly report of vulnerabilities. The vulnerability count around monthly is approximately twenty thousand, thirty thousand, or more every month. We get a report from the Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management department showing what the vulnerabilities are. We need to find out the most potential vulnerability. Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management shows that the most important things are operating system related criticality, application related, and third-party application related vulnerabilities. It aggregates the most potential criticality in a severity. Severity means how critical this vulnerability is. There are numbers from one to five, with five being the most critical vulnerability. When we get a report, there is a column as a criticality tier. We usually filter it out with tier five, so all the vulnerabilities that are the most potential come up. For example, if I filter out with the five-tier, it usually shows around the most potential vulnerability count of one thousand or two thousand. This is not only for one server. We manage around eight hundred to nine hundred servers. We get a report every month for all servers' vulnerabilities, and it is approximately thirty thousand plus. It shows each and every potential critical vulnerability. We found two or three for each server. If we want to patch or deploy that vulnerability on each server, we need to take downtime. We have limitations to patch the servers each day. For example, in one day, we can patch fifty servers. If we want to patch five hundred servers, within ten days, we close that potential vulnerability by taking downtime as per the scheduled time. Mostly we take downtime at night for the deployment and patching those vulnerabilities. Once we complete our side patching, as per the Patch Tuesday schedule when Microsoft releases their patches and security patches every second Tuesday, we do patches and close the vulnerability with the remedies Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management shows you. After patching, we take a report and share with the security team that we have closed this vulnerability and kindly scan the servers for rescanning. After patching, we take a reboot, and then after reboot, we rescan the system. We ensure everything is as per the expectation or not, and we verify if the vulnerability is closed or not. We rescan all the systems, and after rescan, it shows the previous vulnerabilities are closed in our scanned system. Confidence comes when we do practical validation. If due to some vulnerabilities or some bugs or some loopholes, attackers attack the servers and successfully collect the data, we do the root cause analysis to understand why the server got compromised or data got compromised. In that case, we learn that the particular server has not been patched since the last one month, two months, or three months. Due to that, till now, this kind of attack has not happened in our infrastructure because we make sure that every month patches should be deployed on that particular server within one month, thirty days. It prevents the situation in which if Microsoft releases one security patch with some enhancement in security, we deploy that. It is not that a particular patch has total one hundred percent security enhancement. Every patch has a loophole and security enhancement both things. If we patch the system and after then, attackers will try to find out the loophole in that particular patch. But once they find the loophole, before that, the second patch will be released by Microsoft, and the second patch will be deployed on that particular server by the patching team. This is how all things work. The attacker will not get enough time. That is why monthly patching is most necessary. We call it patching or vulnerability management. Monitoring tools such as Zabbix provide real-time or active monitoring. Zabbix alerts provide alerts in different colors and criticality. For example, if there is one system that uses one hundred percent CPU utilization or memory usage, or disk space issue, these kinds of real environment monitoring will show. If you search some websites on Google, sometimes that website takes a long time to be visible on your device. That happens due to latency, and latency happens due to high memory utilization or RAM utilization. It is the time travel between the sender and receiver. When you send the request to the server, the server will give a response to you. The latency depends on read and write data. Zabbix is used for that. It enhances user experience, prevents downtime, and provides latest alerts. It monitors each and everything. My overall review rating for Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management is eight out of ten.
I speak a little English. I have experience with Check Point solutions and Microsoft solutions. I have a little experience with the product portfolio of Check Point, as I have worked with this brand in a product manager commercial profile. I sold a project two years ago about Check Point Harmony SASE or SASE product. In the last twelve months with Check Point, I have experience with the firewalls and Harmony Email, but not with SASE. With the Maestro lines, I have experience, but not with Quantum Force, as I have worked with Maestro and Harmony Email. With CrowdStrike, I have a little experience, something about five months. I have worked with Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management and VMDR. In the cybersecurity view, I understand what is being said. I cannot understand the TrueConfirm capability or tool. I am not familiar with the term TrueConfirm for threat enrichment capability. Qualys is a reliable tool. It is beneficial so far because the market today needs to protect all these factors that use AI for taking confidential information from the company. My profile is more commercial, but I know about the deployment of these tools being easy for companies to be prepared for this; however, a good assessment is necessary to review the architecture of the customer for a good chronogram and good time for the development of these tools. For this tool, we do not need cloud deployment because it requires some server and deployment from the endpoints of the company, so I do not have this technical knowledge. Qualys has a good price for the benefits of the development of this tool. My overall rating for this review is nine out of ten.