The module system I refer to is actually the dynamic application, with each dynamic application working to collect data from the endpoint server and reporting the same data to the ScienceLogic engine, which, in turn, reports to the centralized server. This is the architecture of ScienceLogic. I use ScienceLogic's dynamic mapping capability for our IT applications. However, there is no option in ScienceLogic to enable the dynamic application automatically. For instance, in tools such as LogicMonitor, once a device is onboarded, all features such as CPU, memory, disk, ping availability, and other KPI metrics automatically align and start collecting data without manual intervention. In ScienceLogic and other tools such as SolarWinds, data collection only begins after a template is applied. Dynamic mapping has helped me gain insights into the operational health of my environment. In our environment, the real-time analytics and event correlation of ScienceLogic are useful in maintaining incidents, as alerts from ScienceLogic are directly sent to IBM Netcool, which is an event management tool. This tool enriches the alerts, correlates events, drops duplicates, and creates tickets in ServiceNow for all customers using IBM Netcool. I have implemented end-to-end processes in ScienceLogic in my previous organization, including collector build, onboarding, off-boarding, and monitoring various applications such as SQL, MySQL, Oracle, and DB2, as well as OS-level monitoring. I have also been involved in ScienceLogic's version compatibility and upgrades, but I feel satisfied with the current performance and if new concepts arise, I am eager to learn and enhance my skills. I give ScienceLogic a rating of 9 out of 10.
As part of my job, I propose ScienceLogic for infrastructure monitoring. I recommend it to customers. The overall rating is seven out of ten. I recommend ScienceLogic to other users.
If I am an enterprise customer seeking comprehensive visibility and basic AI features, this solution is recommendable since few companies can guarantee an enterprise-level solution scalable at the right cost. Newer SaaS companies may offer fewer features but boast high return on investment and easier implementations. Principally in the enterprise sector, this is a viable option over traditional legacy alternatives, whereas for medium or smaller customers, it may not be suitable. The overall product rating is six out of ten. It's suitable for specific customers, although slower in implementation and offering tougher ROI compared to some. This rating reflects my consideration of various customers, conversations, and observations. I should make sure to highlight the Skylar feature, as it is an exciting development. It's new and focuses on prediction and automation—where innovation in this category is leading. It's geared towards proactive and predictive monitoring, relevant for those seeking ITIL level five performance. Its potential is substantial, yet since it's still developing, comprehensive evaluation is difficult.
The solution is useful for monitoring hybrid environments, clouds, and traditional data centers. From a cloud perspective, we use the tool's very basic features as per our company's requirements. In our company, the tool helps us with the KPIs we plan to achieve. Right now, my company usually goes for about five minutes porting into it, so we use it as a tool that provides us something near real-time monitoring. My company doesn't use ScienceLogic's features, though it has good automation features. Our company uses Ansible for all automation, and we have integrated ScienceLogic with Ansible. ScienceLogic sends events to IBM Netcool, where events are handled through event automation. In terms of the reporting and analytics part, whatever out-of-the-box or default reports are available can be useful to some extent. There are times when there is a requirement for some additional customizations to serve our company's purposes in the area of reporting. The tool improves our company's response time to incidents. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. From the monitoring perspective, the tool fulfills my requirements. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
IT Systems Engineer - Wintel at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Aug 25, 2023
ScienceLogic is a great tool for system administrators. It is convenient and feature-rich, with a lot of customization options available. The dashboards and support information are very specific and detailed; you can customize it for convenience. The pre-built information is also very useful and granular, making it easy to identify problems. The alert levels are well-defined and can be customized for each customer. ScienceLogic is also very intuitive and can automatically pick up signals and categorize alerts. ScienceLogic's alert system is already top-notch, but you can also customize it further to meet the needs of each customer specifically. For example, you can set different alert levels for different SLAs. You can also customize the alert notifications to be sent to the appropriate people. This way, you can ensure all alerts are handled quickly and efficiently. We can also customize the alert levels depending on the nature of the issue. The alert system is designed well and provides very specific load ratings. However, we can customize the alerts per our customer's SL agreements. Overall, I rate ScienceLogic an eight out of ten.
People looking to use the solution must religiously use the tool's capabilities instead of trying to reinvent something that the tool does not do. They must use the Python capabilities available in the solution. It's helpful. The product needs a lot of improvement. I rate the tool nine because I have not completely utilized the potential capability of the tool yet. The tool has a lot of automation and integration capabilities. We can integrate the tool with many other tools. The solution is capable of integration both inside and outside. It comes with a lot of features, including discovery, monitoring, event management, and automation, for our hybrid cloud monitoring environment. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We have five to six people that are used for the maintenance of the solution. My advice to others is they need to map their requirement with the tool to see if it meets their needs. They might be able to find a less expensive tool that can meet all of their needs. The tool has a lot of capabilities but it is important to size it effectively. I rate ScienceLogic a seven out of ten.
Assistant Management Specialist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Jul 6, 2022
We're a customer. I'd recommend the solution to others. There are many marketing tools in the market. I have less experience with those. I do, however, have experience with ScienceLogic. It has a good design. You might need someone from support to do the installation. However, apart from the installation, you can understand everything very easily. It has a lot of integration capabilities as well. We can integrate with a lot of things. We can monitor emails. We can monitor APL. We can handle customization and automation and there is a great dashboard. They have lot of features to take advantage of. That's why people should go and use the tool. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
The benefit for ScienceLogic is they are agentless. This is one of the most benefits of using ScienceLogic. You often don't need to install any agents. When we used other solutions the agents caused us some delays in progress. I rate ScienceLogic a nine out of ten.
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports...
The module system I refer to is actually the dynamic application, with each dynamic application working to collect data from the endpoint server and reporting the same data to the ScienceLogic engine, which, in turn, reports to the centralized server. This is the architecture of ScienceLogic. I use ScienceLogic's dynamic mapping capability for our IT applications. However, there is no option in ScienceLogic to enable the dynamic application automatically. For instance, in tools such as LogicMonitor, once a device is onboarded, all features such as CPU, memory, disk, ping availability, and other KPI metrics automatically align and start collecting data without manual intervention. In ScienceLogic and other tools such as SolarWinds, data collection only begins after a template is applied. Dynamic mapping has helped me gain insights into the operational health of my environment. In our environment, the real-time analytics and event correlation of ScienceLogic are useful in maintaining incidents, as alerts from ScienceLogic are directly sent to IBM Netcool, which is an event management tool. This tool enriches the alerts, correlates events, drops duplicates, and creates tickets in ServiceNow for all customers using IBM Netcool. I have implemented end-to-end processes in ScienceLogic in my previous organization, including collector build, onboarding, off-boarding, and monitoring various applications such as SQL, MySQL, Oracle, and DB2, as well as OS-level monitoring. I have also been involved in ScienceLogic's version compatibility and upgrades, but I feel satisfied with the current performance and if new concepts arise, I am eager to learn and enhance my skills. I give ScienceLogic a rating of 9 out of 10.
I would rate ScienceLogic between 8.5 to nine out of 10.
As part of my job, I propose ScienceLogic for infrastructure monitoring. I recommend it to customers. The overall rating is seven out of ten. I recommend ScienceLogic to other users.
If I am an enterprise customer seeking comprehensive visibility and basic AI features, this solution is recommendable since few companies can guarantee an enterprise-level solution scalable at the right cost. Newer SaaS companies may offer fewer features but boast high return on investment and easier implementations. Principally in the enterprise sector, this is a viable option over traditional legacy alternatives, whereas for medium or smaller customers, it may not be suitable. The overall product rating is six out of ten. It's suitable for specific customers, although slower in implementation and offering tougher ROI compared to some. This rating reflects my consideration of various customers, conversations, and observations. I should make sure to highlight the Skylar feature, as it is an exciting development. It's new and focuses on prediction and automation—where innovation in this category is leading. It's geared towards proactive and predictive monitoring, relevant for those seeking ITIL level five performance. Its potential is substantial, yet since it's still developing, comprehensive evaluation is difficult.
The solution is useful for monitoring hybrid environments, clouds, and traditional data centers. From a cloud perspective, we use the tool's very basic features as per our company's requirements. In our company, the tool helps us with the KPIs we plan to achieve. Right now, my company usually goes for about five minutes porting into it, so we use it as a tool that provides us something near real-time monitoring. My company doesn't use ScienceLogic's features, though it has good automation features. Our company uses Ansible for all automation, and we have integrated ScienceLogic with Ansible. ScienceLogic sends events to IBM Netcool, where events are handled through event automation. In terms of the reporting and analytics part, whatever out-of-the-box or default reports are available can be useful to some extent. There are times when there is a requirement for some additional customizations to serve our company's purposes in the area of reporting. The tool improves our company's response time to incidents. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. From the monitoring perspective, the tool fulfills my requirements. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.
ScienceLogic is a great tool for system administrators. It is convenient and feature-rich, with a lot of customization options available. The dashboards and support information are very specific and detailed; you can customize it for convenience. The pre-built information is also very useful and granular, making it easy to identify problems. The alert levels are well-defined and can be customized for each customer. ScienceLogic is also very intuitive and can automatically pick up signals and categorize alerts. ScienceLogic's alert system is already top-notch, but you can also customize it further to meet the needs of each customer specifically. For example, you can set different alert levels for different SLAs. You can also customize the alert notifications to be sent to the appropriate people. This way, you can ensure all alerts are handled quickly and efficiently. We can also customize the alert levels depending on the nature of the issue. The alert system is designed well and provides very specific load ratings. However, we can customize the alerts per our customer's SL agreements. Overall, I rate ScienceLogic an eight out of ten.
People looking to use the solution must religiously use the tool's capabilities instead of trying to reinvent something that the tool does not do. They must use the Python capabilities available in the solution. It's helpful. The product needs a lot of improvement. I rate the tool nine because I have not completely utilized the potential capability of the tool yet. The tool has a lot of automation and integration capabilities. We can integrate the tool with many other tools. The solution is capable of integration both inside and outside. It comes with a lot of features, including discovery, monitoring, event management, and automation, for our hybrid cloud monitoring environment. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We have five to six people that are used for the maintenance of the solution. My advice to others is they need to map their requirement with the tool to see if it meets their needs. They might be able to find a less expensive tool that can meet all of their needs. The tool has a lot of capabilities but it is important to size it effectively. I rate ScienceLogic a seven out of ten.
We're a customer. I'd recommend the solution to others. There are many marketing tools in the market. I have less experience with those. I do, however, have experience with ScienceLogic. It has a good design. You might need someone from support to do the installation. However, apart from the installation, you can understand everything very easily. It has a lot of integration capabilities as well. We can integrate with a lot of things. We can monitor emails. We can monitor APL. We can handle customization and automation and there is a great dashboard. They have lot of features to take advantage of. That's why people should go and use the tool. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
The benefit for ScienceLogic is they are agentless. This is one of the most benefits of using ScienceLogic. You often don't need to install any agents. When we used other solutions the agents caused us some delays in progress. I rate ScienceLogic a nine out of ten.
I would rate ScienceLogic a ten out of ten. It is a pretty good and well-done product.