Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is the best option on the market at the moment. I think the documentation and information over the internet about Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform are available in abundance, and I don't see much of an issue with that. I have given this review an overall rating of 7.5.
I have utilized Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform's SD-WAN feature, and I think it's highly effective. The real-time analytics and machine learning capabilities have not been fully utilized yet; that's something which our customers are exploring as of now. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution a 10.
My recommendation for those considering Versa is to improve the skill set within the industry and ensure more awareness about the technology. There needs to be exploration of other technologies available in Versa to benefit clients and make networks smoother. I rate the solution eight out of ten.
Senior Network Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 10
Jul 23, 2024
Versa’s approach to network optimization focuses on application-based steering. This means you can prioritize specific applications like Zoom or Teams during critical activities like conference meetings. Versa uses this application-based steering to select the best path among multiple links, ensuring that important applications receive the necessary bandwidth. Rather than optimizing solely for the network, the applications are emphasized. You can decide which applications to prioritize, while others may receive lower priority. For instance, if some applications experience issues, you might still be fine with them, but it’s crucial to ensure that essential applications like video conferencing remain unaffected by network congestion. Versa is a great option if you have a simple solution using SASE, such as connecting branches and adding a security layer. Based on my deployment experience, I can recommend Versa for this use case. It addresses the needs of organizations looking to enhance security while maintaining straightforward connectivity between branches. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
You could pick Versa if you're looking to replace all of your infrastructure on-site. It is very effective if you want to consolidate your firewall, analytics, and all that kind of stuff into a single box. It's got a great firewall that's built into there. It does most of the stuff that you need, such as built-in DDoS mitigation. It ticks many boxes for people who don't necessarily have the capability to do that. It is cost-saving instead of taking a separate DDoS protection or buying a firewall if you're looking at a dual hundred-meg type solution. The box probably won't cost you more than £150 a month at maximum, so that's incredibly affordable versus a full-state firewall because everything comes built-in. Versa is good when you have a heavy branch when building office infrastructure. On the flip side, that's where I'd suggest VMware. If you have one or two main offices, and most people otherwise work remotely, or you have some small overseas sites with five people or something like that, that's where VMware comes into its own.
Learn what your peers think about Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
My recommendation of the solution to other users would purely be based upon the requirement of the users. If they are getting their requirements fulfilled, they can use the tool. Sometimes, I have seen users not wanting it for the connectivity facility it provides but for security. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Versa is more suitable for customers who have large deployments because it doesn't compete well with the products suitable for small to medium customers. So they have a different product called Titan, and it's suitable. The solution is better for customers who have medium to large deployments.
We are a customer and an end-user. I was in a different company before working with SD-WAN before. This is a new company for me. We don't have live customers yet. If you're going to start using it, it's best to pick up a feature at a time and follow the documentation carefully. Try to configure it yourself and understand what's happening exactly. It's just a lot of hands-on work that really helps to understand what is going on with Versa with the CPE. That's how I learned that solution. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Networking Consultant / Networking Business Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Jul 3, 2022
We're a Versa partner. I don't recall which version we are using. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. I would recommend a field test to new users. Don't just look at the paper. Try to experience it in the live network. Most of the time, that could really make a difference. If customers would like to know about it, the better way is to have a proof of concept or live demo in their network running for a certain period, with their network running on top of this SD-WAN as that's what really actually makes the difference. They could see the improvement firsthand. They could see that the bandwidth is increased. Or find out if it really could replace the MPLS with the internet. Those are the things that on paper, sometimes we could not really feel or know.
The Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is a comprehensive solution that provides secure access to cloud applications and services. It combines networking and security functions into a single platform, making it easier for organizations to manage their network infrastructure. The platform includes features such as SD-WAN, VPN, firewall, web filtering, and more. It also offers advanced security capabilities such as intrusion prevention, malware protection, and threat...
Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is the best option on the market at the moment. I think the documentation and information over the internet about Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform are available in abundance, and I don't see much of an issue with that. I have given this review an overall rating of 7.5.
I have utilized Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform's SD-WAN feature, and I think it's highly effective. The real-time analytics and machine learning capabilities have not been fully utilized yet; that's something which our customers are exploring as of now. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution a 10.
My recommendation for those considering Versa is to improve the skill set within the industry and ensure more awareness about the technology. There needs to be exploration of other technologies available in Versa to benefit clients and make networks smoother. I rate the solution eight out of ten.
Versa’s approach to network optimization focuses on application-based steering. This means you can prioritize specific applications like Zoom or Teams during critical activities like conference meetings. Versa uses this application-based steering to select the best path among multiple links, ensuring that important applications receive the necessary bandwidth. Rather than optimizing solely for the network, the applications are emphasized. You can decide which applications to prioritize, while others may receive lower priority. For instance, if some applications experience issues, you might still be fine with them, but it’s crucial to ensure that essential applications like video conferencing remain unaffected by network congestion. Versa is a great option if you have a simple solution using SASE, such as connecting branches and adding a security layer. Based on my deployment experience, I can recommend Versa for this use case. It addresses the needs of organizations looking to enhance security while maintaining straightforward connectivity between branches. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I would rate it 7 out of 10.
You could pick Versa if you're looking to replace all of your infrastructure on-site. It is very effective if you want to consolidate your firewall, analytics, and all that kind of stuff into a single box. It's got a great firewall that's built into there. It does most of the stuff that you need, such as built-in DDoS mitigation. It ticks many boxes for people who don't necessarily have the capability to do that. It is cost-saving instead of taking a separate DDoS protection or buying a firewall if you're looking at a dual hundred-meg type solution. The box probably won't cost you more than £150 a month at maximum, so that's incredibly affordable versus a full-state firewall because everything comes built-in. Versa is good when you have a heavy branch when building office infrastructure. On the flip side, that's where I'd suggest VMware. If you have one or two main offices, and most people otherwise work remotely, or you have some small overseas sites with five people or something like that, that's where VMware comes into its own.
My recommendation of the solution to other users would purely be based upon the requirement of the users. If they are getting their requirements fulfilled, they can use the tool. Sometimes, I have seen users not wanting it for the connectivity facility it provides but for security. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Versa is more suitable for customers who have large deployments because it doesn't compete well with the products suitable for small to medium customers. So they have a different product called Titan, and it's suitable. The solution is better for customers who have medium to large deployments.
We are a customer and an end-user. I was in a different company before working with SD-WAN before. This is a new company for me. We don't have live customers yet. If you're going to start using it, it's best to pick up a feature at a time and follow the documentation carefully. Try to configure it yourself and understand what's happening exactly. It's just a lot of hands-on work that really helps to understand what is going on with Versa with the CPE. That's how I learned that solution. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate Versa FlexVNF at eight on a scale from one to ten.
We're a Versa partner. I don't recall which version we are using. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. I would recommend a field test to new users. Don't just look at the paper. Try to experience it in the live network. Most of the time, that could really make a difference. If customers would like to know about it, the better way is to have a proof of concept or live demo in their network running for a certain period, with their network running on top of this SD-WAN as that's what really actually makes the difference. They could see the improvement firsthand. They could see that the bandwidth is increased. Or find out if it really could replace the MPLS with the internet. Those are the things that on paper, sometimes we could not really feel or know.
I would give FlexVNF a rating of six out of ten.
Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of ten.