Automation Engineer at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Nov 26, 2025
I have nothing to do with that. I think I have been involved in some conversations, but it is all over my head. I am given the tools to work with, which is nice. I am far enough down the totem pole that I do not get involved in costing and those conversations.
Engineering Architect Head at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Sep 22, 2025
Regarding pricing, I do not have extensive detail, but it varies based on the agreement with clients. Since we have a good relationship with Automation Anywhere, I do not see much difficulty in licensing costs or flexibility in licensing models compared to other products.
Associate Leadership Team at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
Aug 27, 2025
The pricing is a bit on the higher side compared to competitors. The bot-based or user-based licensing model can become expensive as automation expands, but the ROI justifies the investment in the long run.
Head of Intelligent Automation | Core Digital & Applications Engineering at a engineering company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Aug 1, 2025
Pricing needs to be more competitive, both in terms of licenses and overall expenses. This is crucial because many use cases cannot be automated if it isn't cost-effective.
While I don't know the exact figures, Automation Anywhere is approximately 10 times more expensive than Power Automate, possibly even more. I have a general idea of the cost for one runner machine, but I don't have exact information about their charging structure.
Lead Solutions Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Jul 14, 2025
When comparing automation tools like UiPath, Power Automate, and Automation Anywhere, Power Automate often comes out as the most cost-effective option. Recently, I've noticed that Automation Anywhere has been charging separately for its various components, such as APIs, agentic processes, and business document automation. This pricing model has led many clients to reconsider their choices, especially those with limited budgets. I've observed a significant trend where not only financial clients but also smaller businesses are migrating back to Power Automate due to its affordability. Power Automate offers a premium plan starting at just $25 per user, making it a more accessible choice for many organizations.
Global Automation Lead at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Jun 17, 2025
The solution is costly and the licensing is very confusing. Earlier, the pricing structure was much simpler. A developer license cost a specific amount, and a runtime license had a separate price. Now, there are only two main figures to consider, in addition to distinct costs for cloud platform maintenance and other services. However, with the introduction of tools like Co-Pilot, things have become more complicated. If you use Co-Pilot, there’s an additional cost associated with it. Moreover, if you utilize AI features within Co-Pilot, there are AI token costs that differ from the standard licensing fees. Therefore, when you're creating a use case that involves Co-Pilot, a runtime license, and GenAI, it can get quite confusing.
Automation Engineer at a healthcare company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 10
May 13, 2025
Regarding the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of the Automation Anywhere platform, I have limited experience in answering as I do not represent the company in this aspect. From what I have heard from my team, the basic pricing seems to work for us. For larger scaling pricing of other features, we need to bring in more clients and a larger volume to justify the potential cost of the license. Every automation license is specific for each hospital since we cannot share files or security due to HIPAA compliance requirements. Currently, we are able to bring in clients in the current price range, though it is becoming more challenging.
In terms of pricing, it's not at all cheap, and that's a concern. The licensing cost is very high. While I don't know the exact prices of other tools, Microsoft offers the lowest pricing for its RPA platform compared to UiPath and Automation Anywhere.
UiPath is exceptionally more expensive than Automation Anywhere. UiPath is far ahead of its competition, but in terms of finances, Automation Anywhere offers better value and is more effective for organizations seeking cost-effective solutions. Small clients tend to go for Power Automate or Automation Anywhere, whereas large clients go for UiPath.
The cost is high for small-scale businesses but it is fine for medium and large enterprises. Its high licensing cost may affect small-scale businesses. Reducing licensing costs would benefit many users.
Automation Anywhere has an advantage in terms of licensing. It is more cost-efficient compared to all other RPA platforms. It is a recommended solution when clients need a cost-efficient automation tool to perform unattended automation.
Vice President - Finance at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Dec 20, 2024
The initial setup and licensing fees are high, and although it saves costs in the long run, reaching the break-even point can take at least six months. This means an initial investment may not yield returns for a year, which is often not feasible due to budget constraints. To address this, we offer amortization options, bearing the initial cost to help clients get started and then transitioning those costs into ongoing implementation support. This approach allows us to win contracts despite the high initial investment.
Automation & Emerging Technology Manager at Johnson Controls, Inc.
Real User
Top 10
Nov 11, 2024
Automation Anywhere's pricing falls within the mid-range, but the long-term benefits outweigh the initial investment. After a year, significant cost savings and efficiency gains become apparent, justifying the expense.
Automation Anywhere is thought to be quite expensive, especially for smaller organizations. The pricing model, which varies based on the number of bots and level of support, can become costly. For corporate environments, it is manageable but still on the higher side.
Vice president at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Sep 13, 2024
On average, a bot runner in Automation Anywhere can cost $5,000, while in Microsoft Power Automate, you can get most of the same functionality for $100. However, when you factor in the materials, support, and ecosystem of Automation Anywhere, it proves to be a more cost-effective solution overall.
It is somewhere in the middle. The price and value of Automation Anywhere are better than UiPath. The pricing is good globally. It could be a little bit cheaper, but it is good.
Automation Anywhere Leader at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Aug 19, 2024
Automation Anywhere's pricing is significantly higher than other RPA solutions. We recently conducted a small proof of concept with their generative AI integration and received a quote of $75,000 for one year. In comparison, Microsoft offered a similar solution for only $20,000. This substantial price difference makes Automation Anywhere one of the most expensive RPA options on the market, second only to UiPath.
The pricing is comparable to other enterprise solutions in Brazil, such as UiPath and Blue Prism. The setup cost is nothing because we deploy it in the cloud. The licensing model isn't too difficult to understand like other solutions.
Technical Manager, Business Automation Rpa at SpartanNash
Real User
Top 10
Jul 1, 2024
The pricing and licensing are reasonable. We were able to get what we needed. The vendor understand what we wanted and offered certain pricing based on what we wanted. As we scale up, the pricing will change according to how we use it.
The pricing of the solution is okay. We've bought licensing via a big bid. It was hard to define as it was the first time we were using the solution. Of the second round, we were very focused on what we needed. We understood the process better. It's provided a lot of value these days.
I do not have any experience with pricing and licensing. We have an admin team and IT team that handles a lot of the infrastructure and technology, so I would not be able to speak too much about that.
Automation Anywhere might have a higher upfront cost than some competitors, but its extensive features and seamless integration with other tools can save organizations money in the long run. This is because they wouldn't need to purchase those capabilities separately.
Automation Anywhere, once a competitively priced option in the RPA market, has seen a shift in its pricing strategy. Currently, it stands as one of the more expensive RPA tools available.
It is not too expensive, but there are many tools available in the market that can provide the same functionality at a cheaper price. I have done some research on the automation market, and I see that there are many automation platforms. There are also open-source ones. Every organization wants to reduce the costs. Organizations are now considering cheaper platforms such as Microsoft Power Automate. Even my current organization is considering migrating to an open-source solution.
Sr automation development at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
Apr 9, 2024
It is cost-efficient in terms of licensing. I found their support good when I was working for the airline client. However, I hear from my managers here that the support price for Tier 3 or premium is a little higher. That is why we are not going for Automation Anywhere. Its price was okay for our client, but for us, it seems expensive.
Director - Transformation & Consulting at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
MSP
Top 20
Feb 16, 2024
They all are very competitive today. At the end of the day, it boils down to the negotiations that happen and what type of partner you are. Are you a premium partner or are you a preferred partner or a gold partner? Prices are very standardized. There could be a little bit of deviation, but they are comparable. It is a pretty saturated market because everybody has been doing our RPA for the last decade, so they are pretty competitive in pricing.
Costing & Finance Systems Senior Specialist at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Feb 14, 2024
It is subscription-based. They have different schemes. The price depends on how you negotiate with the local partner or local representative in your country.
The price for Automation Anywhere is reasonable compared to others, but there are some feature limitations. Specifically, the ability of one bot to support multiple VMs is an issue, distinguishing it from some other solutions.
Automation Anywhere is generally more expensive than Power Automate, but they may offer a better price for large volume consumption. On a scale of one to ten with ten being the most expensive, I rate the price of Automation Anywhere an eight out of ten.
Digital Technologies Manager at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Jul 24, 2023
These types of companies, in automation, need to evaluate their business models. They sell it by license, but if they could charge by case or by interaction, that might be better. Right now, it's expensive when you want to scale or use them for simple processes.
Project Manager at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Jul 21, 2023
The solution is quite expensive. Not every organization can consider this option. That's one reason they might go with real integration via API. There are additional support costs. We didn't buy the support because we have a capable team that is doing the job.
Junior RPA developer at a tech services company with self employed
Real User
Jul 19, 2023
I think the pricing is reasonable, but clients often perceive it as expensive. This perception might change once we see the benefits, understand the full process, and realize what is required to achieve our goals.
It is expensive. I would rate Automation Anywhere an eight out of ten in terms of pricing. They bill for every IQ bot that you have. We do not use IQ Bot, but we have a license, and they bill for every thousand pages.
Automation Anywhere's licensing cost is better than UiPath and Blue Prism. The licensing cost is a big factor because you might have 50 or more bots, and the per-bot license cost is about $5,000. That is the amount that you need to invest.
Presales Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Consultant
Apr 14, 2023
Although the initial implementation cost of Automation Anywhere is relatively high compared to other options, its annual subscription cost is lower than UiPath's, which has the opposite pricing structure.
Program Manager, Automation Centre Of Excellence at a legal firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Dec 20, 2022
Similar to how competing products are priced, the solution has separate licenses for features that should be included in a bundle package. For example, the analytics dashboard and bot insights are sold as separate licenses. No one wants to buy a product that is too complex because components are sold separately. Give longstanding customers these benefits as icing on the cake. The solution is not the least or most expensive. Pricing is good and in the middle so I rate pricing a five out of ten.
Head of Robotics Process Automation at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Apr 6, 2022
The solution is cost-effective in comparison to others. However, you need to pay for the control room for each environment. You also need developer licenses and even runners are required for test and pre-production environments.
Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Feb 20, 2022
We're paying for a yearly package for Automation Anywhere (AA). It's not a standard license. It's a license package, e.g. it comes with the fee for automation, or the license for the product, and anything beyond that, we pay a base fee, and whether we utilize it or not, it's paid for, and it has to be allocated. That's the current deal we have. What would be better is for them to have different packages for different types of organization.
Performance & Functional Automation Specialist at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Dec 3, 2021
Automation Anywhere's price is a little expensive. Moreover, it comes on like a single/set license. It should come in perpetual licenses. If a license is not getting used, then it has to be switched over to some other process. In cases like this, Automation Anywhere does not come up. I think they lose a lot of business because they do not use a perpetual model.
Associate Vice President at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Oct 19, 2021
The price of Automation Anywhere is a little higher than some of the competition, such as UiPath. However, depending on the use case and other factors we are able to receive some discounts.
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Sep 29, 2021
I'm not too sure about the pricing part, because our organizers handle that. I'm just a developer. We get the software already installed on our machine.
Bot Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Nov 11, 2020
I don't have any information about the pricing or licensing on offer. It's my understanding that there's different pricing, depending on how many licenses a client needs. It's very flexible. If a client just needs a certain aspect, they can just get a license for that.
Robotic Process Automation Developer at Mekkanos Limited
Real User
Oct 31, 2020
The cost of unattended bots is reasonable and when it comes to attended automation the licensing cost for Attended bot runners is a bit expensive. The overall price is not so expensive compared to other tools.
I advise others that even as of right now, the setup cost and licensing cost to automate bots on Automation Anywhere is steep but it is worth the investment!
Licensing is pretty straightforward with Automation Anywhere since creator licenses are unlimited and free if we select a certain package. Setup cost and pricing is also very reasonable which helped us in making all client projects economically viable
Calculate the IQ Bot page count and usage. Factor in the development as well as training time required for IQ Bot training and validation. The effort is easily underestimated.
The cloud-based version comes at an increased cost, although our clients are happy with the new features and have not complained about the pricing. Precious things are valuable, and they know that.
Head of Automation at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Oct 31, 2020
You need to be mindful about the initial server costs if you go with an on-premise deployment model as the specification can surprise some of your stakeholders. For licensing, always try to get through reselling partners for getting more customized and better prices.
Automation anywhere is best suited for processes that have high volume and are repetitive. They offer good discounts when purchased in bulk or they provide extra bit runner runners with the existing prices. The setup cost basically depends on usage. They can be installed both on-premises or on the cloud depending upon the user's requirement.
1. Setup cost is minimal as AAE Control Room is hosted in the cloud. Also, with AAE no dedicated setups need to be run and installed 2. Licensing cost is relatively less compared to other solutions on the market 3. Pricing stands out well compared to other solutions
Sap BW on HANA Consultant at Infosys Technologies Ltd
Real User
Oct 30, 2020
License for AA, before investing in infrastructure list out and analyze the current setup, since AA can be implemented at a minimal cost as well without extra infra/setup.
Business Operations Associate Consultant at ZS Associates
Real User
Oct 30, 2020
The costs are just a one-time cost, but the amount of savings it will generate is uncountable. So it's better to invest in something now, learn and start saving your time, effort, and money in the future.
Costs are ok. IQ Bot is too expensive. Bot Vision should come for free as one can easily use a number of other visualization options for free. There is no point in paying too much for too little.
There was a little confusion in terms of the setup costs for the pure cloud version because it was a bit misleading when we understood that all the Control rooms and the bot creators and runners would be on the cloud. The provisioning for the bot agents was not understood immediately.
Enterprise Manager of Automation at Envision Healthcare
Real User
Oct 29, 2020
RPA solutions are not cheap. There will be a large cost to implement any RPA solution but ROI can be huge and very quick if you are not timid. Do not go slow. Embrace the platform and it's huge potential and your RPA program will be a cash cow for your organization.
We generally follow the Gain-Sharing Pricing model, which enables the customer to start getting the RPA benefits right from day one of their implementation.
As an RPA developer, I do not personally have much to say about this topic. I find the license pricing to be competitive and reflective of the pricing models throughout the RPA space, and I believe there is a lot of value in continuing to maintain the free community edition platform.
Know ahead of time what capabilities you are going to require and plan accordingly to determine the total number of user licenses and development licenses required.
Pricing depends upon the number of licenses required by the company. They can implement using the community version. If their business can be automated based upon the business process workload they can decide a number of Bot runner and Developer licenses are required.
The Sales team would take care about pricing, since other teams were also using AA. Licensing was modified based on the runners needed as per the projects. Number of developer licenses were fixed.
So far so good. When it comes to 2019 and the AA cloud I think many are skeptical about the pricing and support model. For example, we are already on our own cloud, AWS and azure so as a cost-effective solution we would obviously want to choose our own platform for hosting. Be it IAAS, PAAS, SAAS etc. Now that AA is proposing a cloud as well, we are still in the thinking phase of the costing model to see if this fits us better in terms of revenue and margins. We are looking forward to experiencing the AA cloud soon.
The one-time setup cost can be fully recovered with the ROI achievement within six months, provided the implementation of bots is planned properly. The pricing and licensing are definitely moderate to costly but easily recoverable by achieving ROI quickly. Our setup cost was only procuring AWS instances but installations are performed in-house.
I advise users or prospective buyers of this product to know more about the features they offer before diving in with this solution, pricing-wise. It is one of the most affordable RPA solutions, and as for licensing, they offer a community edition that greatly helps anyone who aspires to learn about the product before buying the enterprise solution. It will give them an overview of the features and functionalities that they will encounter when using the robot.
My only suggestion in terms of pricing is very generic and that is to consider that as much as RPA saves cost and does automation, please get a realistic estimation done on whether you are really achieving any ROI over your investment with RPA. Once you are sure about it, go for it.
Deputy Manager - Automation, Business Transformation at a performing arts with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Oct 22, 2020
The licensing model and cost are very impressive. Now, you do not have to worry about infra setup cost like Server, Database as it comes free of cost with the A2019 cloud version.
Presales Solutions Architect at PT. Artapala Telekomindo (Business Partner of ESRI Indonesi
Real User
Oct 22, 2020
The price between distributor and partner is different, especially in terms of the discount. We cannot lock the discount from partner to distribution, so we still have a different price.
With the newer cloud version of Automation Anywhere product, the setup cost has been cut down because the customer doesn't need to invest in new hardware. Automation Anywhere is flexible in terms of costing and licensing.
Manager, Robotic Process Automation at Celerity IT, LLC
Real User
Oct 20, 2020
I really enjoy the pricing options with Automation Anywhere, as they are able to flex their ability to adapt to the needs of the customer really well. I am sure the specifics for some pricing are on a partner-by-partner basis but providing the ability to scale the licenses, setup, and pricing to the customer is a huge benefit with Automation Anywhere. Their technical support system and response times directly to a partner are really good.
This is a comprehensive automation offering with a scalable architecture and flexible pricing models. This keeps the RPA TCO low and you can automate with confidence.
Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI...
I have nothing to do with that. I think I have been involved in some conversations, but it is all over my head. I am given the tools to work with, which is nice. I am far enough down the totem pole that I do not get involved in costing and those conversations.
Regarding pricing, I do not have extensive detail, but it varies based on the agreement with clients. Since we have a good relationship with Automation Anywhere, I do not see much difficulty in licensing costs or flexibility in licensing models compared to other products.
The pricing is a bit on the higher side compared to competitors. The bot-based or user-based licensing model can become expensive as automation expands, but the ROI justifies the investment in the long run.
Pricing needs to be more competitive, both in terms of licenses and overall expenses. This is crucial because many use cases cannot be automated if it isn't cost-effective.
While I don't know the exact figures, Automation Anywhere is approximately 10 times more expensive than Power Automate, possibly even more. I have a general idea of the cost for one runner machine, but I don't have exact information about their charging structure.
When comparing automation tools like UiPath, Power Automate, and Automation Anywhere, Power Automate often comes out as the most cost-effective option. Recently, I've noticed that Automation Anywhere has been charging separately for its various components, such as APIs, agentic processes, and business document automation. This pricing model has led many clients to reconsider their choices, especially those with limited budgets. I've observed a significant trend where not only financial clients but also smaller businesses are migrating back to Power Automate due to its affordability. Power Automate offers a premium plan starting at just $25 per user, making it a more accessible choice for many organizations.
Automation Anywhere is good, but Microsoft Power Automate offers unattended machines at a very competitive cost.
The solution is costly and the licensing is very confusing. Earlier, the pricing structure was much simpler. A developer license cost a specific amount, and a runtime license had a separate price. Now, there are only two main figures to consider, in addition to distinct costs for cloud platform maintenance and other services. However, with the introduction of tools like Co-Pilot, things have become more complicated. If you use Co-Pilot, there’s an additional cost associated with it. Moreover, if you utilize AI features within Co-Pilot, there are AI token costs that differ from the standard licensing fees. Therefore, when you're creating a use case that involves Co-Pilot, a runtime license, and GenAI, it can get quite confusing.
I am happy with the pricing, the setup costs, and the licensing; I do not have any problems.
Regarding the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of the Automation Anywhere platform, I have limited experience in answering as I do not represent the company in this aspect. From what I have heard from my team, the basic pricing seems to work for us. For larger scaling pricing of other features, we need to bring in more clients and a larger volume to justify the potential cost of the license. Every automation license is specific for each hospital since we cannot share files or security due to HIPAA compliance requirements. Currently, we are able to bring in clients in the current price range, though it is becoming more challenging.
In terms of pricing, it's not at all cheap, and that's a concern. The licensing cost is very high. While I don't know the exact prices of other tools, Microsoft offers the lowest pricing for its RPA platform compared to UiPath and Automation Anywhere.
I do not know the price, but I am told that it is cheaper than UiPath.
UiPath is exceptionally more expensive than Automation Anywhere. UiPath is far ahead of its competition, but in terms of finances, Automation Anywhere offers better value and is more effective for organizations seeking cost-effective solutions. Small clients tend to go for Power Automate or Automation Anywhere, whereas large clients go for UiPath.
The cost is high for small-scale businesses but it is fine for medium and large enterprises. Its high licensing cost may affect small-scale businesses. Reducing licensing costs would benefit many users.
It is reasonable and affordable. If you consider the tasks that we can get done using this, the pricing is reasonable and affordable.
Automation Anywhere has an advantage in terms of licensing. It is more cost-efficient compared to all other RPA platforms. It is a recommended solution when clients need a cost-efficient automation tool to perform unattended automation.
The initial setup and licensing fees are high, and although it saves costs in the long run, reaching the break-even point can take at least six months. This means an initial investment may not yield returns for a year, which is often not feasible due to budget constraints. To address this, we offer amortization options, bearing the initial cost to help clients get started and then transitioning those costs into ongoing implementation support. This approach allows us to win contracts despite the high initial investment.
Although the pricing is somewhat expensive, it is worth it for the value provided.
Automation Anywhere's pricing falls within the mid-range, but the long-term benefits outweigh the initial investment. After a year, significant cost savings and efficiency gains become apparent, justifying the expense.
Automation Anywhere is thought to be quite expensive, especially for smaller organizations. The pricing model, which varies based on the number of bots and level of support, can become costly. For corporate environments, it is manageable but still on the higher side.
Automation Anywhere is expensive, making it more suitable for enterprise organizations.
I have heard that Automation Anywhere is expensive.
On average, a bot runner in Automation Anywhere can cost $5,000, while in Microsoft Power Automate, you can get most of the same functionality for $100. However, when you factor in the materials, support, and ecosystem of Automation Anywhere, it proves to be a more cost-effective solution overall.
Automation Anywhere's pricing is excellent.
It is somewhere in the middle. The price and value of Automation Anywhere are better than UiPath. The pricing is good globally. It could be a little bit cheaper, but it is good.
Automation Anywhere's pricing is significantly higher than other RPA solutions. We recently conducted a small proof of concept with their generative AI integration and received a quote of $75,000 for one year. In comparison, Microsoft offered a similar solution for only $20,000. This substantial price difference makes Automation Anywhere one of the most expensive RPA options on the market, second only to UiPath.
We purchase Automation Anywhere through a service partner that's also helping us with those costs.
The pricing is comparable to other enterprise solutions in Brazil, such as UiPath and Blue Prism. The setup cost is nothing because we deploy it in the cloud. The licensing model isn't too difficult to understand like other solutions.
We find it comparable to other products out there. I wouldn't say huge differentiators from that perspective.
The pricing and licensing are reasonable. We were able to get what we needed. The vendor understand what we wanted and offered certain pricing based on what we wanted. As we scale up, the pricing will change according to how we use it.
The pricing of the solution is okay. We've bought licensing via a big bid. It was hard to define as it was the first time we were using the solution. Of the second round, we were very focused on what we needed. We understood the process better. It's provided a lot of value these days.
I do not have any experience with pricing and licensing. We have an admin team and IT team that handles a lot of the infrastructure and technology, so I would not be able to speak too much about that.
I am not engaged in that portion of it; my leader is, which is good because then I do not have to have many discussions.
Automation Anywhere is somewhat expensive. The prices are slightly higher, but if you need something, you must pay for it.
The price is a bit higher than other options.
Automation Anywhere might have a higher upfront cost than some competitors, but its extensive features and seamless integration with other tools can save organizations money in the long run. This is because they wouldn't need to purchase those capabilities separately.
Automation Anywhere falls within a mid-range price point when compared to other RPA tools on the market.
My understanding is that the license cost of Automation Anywhere is more reasonable than UiPath and Blue Prism.
Automation Anywhere, once a competitively priced option in the RPA market, has seen a shift in its pricing strategy. Currently, it stands as one of the more expensive RPA tools available.
It is not too expensive, but there are many tools available in the market that can provide the same functionality at a cheaper price. I have done some research on the automation market, and I see that there are many automation platforms. There are also open-source ones. Every organization wants to reduce the costs. Organizations are now considering cheaper platforms such as Microsoft Power Automate. Even my current organization is considering migrating to an open-source solution.
It is cost-efficient in terms of licensing. I found their support good when I was working for the airline client. However, I hear from my managers here that the support price for Tier 3 or premium is a little higher. That is why we are not going for Automation Anywhere. Its price was okay for our client, but for us, it seems expensive.
They all are very competitive today. At the end of the day, it boils down to the negotiations that happen and what type of partner you are. Are you a premium partner or are you a preferred partner or a gold partner? Prices are very standardized. There could be a little bit of deviation, but they are comparable. It is a pretty saturated market because everybody has been doing our RPA for the last decade, so they are pretty competitive in pricing.
It is subscription-based. They have different schemes. The price depends on how you negotiate with the local partner or local representative in your country.
The licensing cost for Automation Anywhere is high.
The price for Automation Anywhere is reasonable compared to others, but there are some feature limitations. Specifically, the ability of one bot to support multiple VMs is an issue, distinguishing it from some other solutions.
Despite being less expensive than UiPath, Automation Anywhere remains cost-prohibitive for many small and medium-sized businesses.
The cost of Automation Anywhere is fine.
Automation Anywhere is expensive.
The pricing is reasonable. The money you spend will be worth it.
Automation Anywhere is generally more expensive than Power Automate, but they may offer a better price for large volume consumption. On a scale of one to ten with ten being the most expensive, I rate the price of Automation Anywhere an eight out of ten.
The pricing is still high. For every new feature, there is an additional charge.
These types of companies, in automation, need to evaluate their business models. They sell it by license, but if they could charge by case or by interaction, that might be better. Right now, it's expensive when you want to scale or use them for simple processes.
The solution is quite expensive. Not every organization can consider this option. That's one reason they might go with real integration via API. There are additional support costs. We didn't buy the support because we have a capable team that is doing the job.
I think the pricing is reasonable, but clients often perceive it as expensive. This perception might change once we see the benefits, understand the full process, and realize what is required to achieve our goals.
It is expensive. I would rate Automation Anywhere an eight out of ten in terms of pricing. They bill for every IQ bot that you have. We do not use IQ Bot, but we have a license, and they bill for every thousand pages.
Automation Anywhere's licensing cost is better than UiPath and Blue Prism. The licensing cost is a big factor because you might have 50 or more bots, and the per-bot license cost is about $5,000. That is the amount that you need to invest.
It's the best RPA tool, but the pricing could be improved.
We are a partner of Automation Anywhere and find the pricing to be reasonable. There is an additional cost for using OCR.
The pricing for Automation Anywhere is reasonable.
Automation Anywhere is a subscription-based service. I think the price is reasonable.
Based on what I've heard, it's costly, but I don't know much about its pricing or licensing. I'm not a part of that.
Although the initial implementation cost of Automation Anywhere is relatively high compared to other options, its annual subscription cost is lower than UiPath's, which has the opposite pricing structure.
Similar to how competing products are priced, the solution has separate licenses for features that should be included in a bundle package. For example, the analytics dashboard and bot insights are sold as separate licenses. No one wants to buy a product that is too complex because components are sold separately. Give longstanding customers these benefits as icing on the cake. The solution is not the least or most expensive. Pricing is good and in the middle so I rate pricing a five out of ten.
The solution is cost-effective in comparison to others. However, you need to pay for the control room for each environment. You also need developer licenses and even runners are required for test and pre-production environments.
Our customers pay for the Automation Anywhere (AA) license yearly, for the cloud version.
There is a community version, which is free. they also have a yearly paid license.
Its price is competitive with all other products in the market.
We're paying for a yearly package for Automation Anywhere (AA). It's not a standard license. It's a license package, e.g. it comes with the fee for automation, or the license for the product, and anything beyond that, we pay a base fee, and whether we utilize it or not, it's paid for, and it has to be allocated. That's the current deal we have. What would be better is for them to have different packages for different types of organization.
Our clients are paying for a yearly subscription of Automation Anywhere (AA).
We're paying a monthly subscription fee for the bot and for services. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee.
There is an annual subscription for Automation Anywhere.
Automation Anywhere's price is a little expensive. Moreover, it comes on like a single/set license. It should come in perpetual licenses. If a license is not getting used, then it has to be switched over to some other process. In cases like this, Automation Anywhere does not come up. I think they lose a lot of business because they do not use a perpetual model.
The setup cost is relatively low and is affordable while offering a quick ROI.
The price of Automation Anywhere is a little higher than some of the competition, such as UiPath. However, depending on the use case and other factors we are able to receive some discounts.
I'm not too sure about the pricing part, because our organizers handle that. I'm just a developer. We get the software already installed on our machine.
Considering the cost, it is a bit high, but worth the price because the output accuracy is high.
I would like to highlight that AA has a bit more pricing range compared to other RPA tools. AA charge for control room. They charge for bot runners.
I don't have any information about the pricing or licensing on offer. It's my understanding that there's different pricing, depending on how many licenses a client needs. It's very flexible. If a client just needs a certain aspect, they can just get a license for that.
Automation Anywhere provided the best quality for products like iPhones.
We are not into advisory. We only use the tool.
The price is a little bit high but the support is good.
Small companies can't afford this cost as the pricing is a little higher.
The pricing of AA is quite high as compared to other tools as it's one of the best RPA tools available in the market.
The cost of unattended bots is reasonable and when it comes to attended automation the licensing cost for Attended bot runners is a bit expensive. The overall price is not so expensive compared to other tools.
We didn't look at other options while choosing Automation Anywhere.
I'm an RPA developer, so I don't have any idea about the cost or pricing but the licenses for developers and runner IQ Bot are pretty good.
I advise others that even as of right now, the setup cost and licensing cost to automate bots on Automation Anywhere is steep but it is worth the investment!
I usually advise them not to worry about the overall cost since the outcome will be profitable.
Licensing is pretty straightforward with Automation Anywhere since creator licenses are unlimited and free if we select a certain package. Setup cost and pricing is also very reasonable which helped us in making all client projects economically viable
Calculate the IQ Bot page count and usage. Factor in the development as well as training time required for IQ Bot training and validation. The effort is easily underestimated.
The cloud-based version comes at an increased cost, although our clients are happy with the new features and have not complained about the pricing. Precious things are valuable, and they know that.
You need to be mindful about the initial server costs if you go with an on-premise deployment model as the specification can surprise some of your stakeholders. For licensing, always try to get through reselling partners for getting more customized and better prices.
Cost Licensing is little high.
Pricing is a bit high when compared to other available tools; however, the tool is worth the cost.
Setup: A2019 is very easy. A single installer does it all. Cost: Cheaper compared to Blue Prism and UiPath Orchestrator. Licensing: Floating licensing
The pricing is reasonable and one can achieve ROI faster when compared to other tools.
I don't have much idea on this, as I am an RPA developer. I would suggest talking to a sales person about this.
We would advise going for Automation Anywhere as it is cost-efficient and easy in-terms of licensing form.
Overall, the pricing of Automation Anywhere is good.
The installation is a bit of hectic process and also the price is more in market compared to other competitors.
Automation anywhere is best suited for processes that have high volume and are repetitive. They offer good discounts when purchased in bulk or they provide extra bit runner runners with the existing prices. The setup cost basically depends on usage. They can be installed both on-premises or on the cloud depending upon the user's requirement.
First have hands on with Community Version and then figure out your requirements.
1. Setup cost is minimal as AAE Control Room is hosted in the cloud. Also, with AAE no dedicated setups need to be run and installed 2. Licensing cost is relatively less compared to other solutions on the market 3. Pricing stands out well compared to other solutions
It's very good in terms of cost and pricing.
The setup cost, pricing and/or licensing of AA sounds reasonable considering its capability.
I do not have that much knowledge about cost/pricing or licensing details.
This is a value for the money product.
License for AA, before investing in infrastructure list out and analyze the current setup, since AA can be implemented at a minimal cost as well without extra infra/setup.
The costs are just a one-time cost, but the amount of savings it will generate is uncountable. So it's better to invest in something now, learn and start saving your time, effort, and money in the future.
I feel the cost of licensing is very high for the A2019 version. There is nothing much to say about the setup cost.
Costs are ok. IQ Bot is too expensive. Bot Vision should come for free as one can easily use a number of other visualization options for free. There is no point in paying too much for too little.
If it is saving FTE and Generating a good ROI then it is Worth Investing.
There was a little confusion in terms of the setup costs for the pure cloud version because it was a bit misleading when we understood that all the Control rooms and the bot creators and runners would be on the cloud. The provisioning for the bot agents was not understood immediately.
Setup cost is a bit okay, but once it is up, it can give a great amount of ROI.
It is a very effective tool since it requires less coding and one can easily get trained on this tool with little knowledge of coding.
It's a great product, timely support, and guidance.
RPA solutions are not cheap. There will be a large cost to implement any RPA solution but ROI can be huge and very quick if you are not timid. Do not go slow. Embrace the platform and it's huge potential and your RPA program will be a cash cow for your organization.
The setup cost is less than other solutions in market
Cost-wise, it should be reduced.
We generally follow the Gain-Sharing Pricing model, which enables the customer to start getting the RPA benefits right from day one of their implementation.
As an RPA developer, I do not personally have much to say about this topic. I find the license pricing to be competitive and reflective of the pricing models throughout the RPA space, and I believe there is a lot of value in continuing to maintain the free community edition platform.
Very flexible.
Know ahead of time what capabilities you are going to require and plan accordingly to determine the total number of user licenses and development licenses required.
There is a free trial so that they can get an overview, and there are different licenses that are very affordable and can suit every business model.
Pricing depends upon the number of licenses required by the company. They can implement using the community version. If their business can be automated based upon the business process workload they can decide a number of Bot runner and Developer licenses are required.
The pricing is a bit higher.
The Sales team would take care about pricing, since other teams were also using AA. Licensing was modified based on the runners needed as per the projects. Number of developer licenses were fixed.
So far so good. When it comes to 2019 and the AA cloud I think many are skeptical about the pricing and support model. For example, we are already on our own cloud, AWS and azure so as a cost-effective solution we would obviously want to choose our own platform for hosting. Be it IAAS, PAAS, SAAS etc. Now that AA is proposing a cloud as well, we are still in the thinking phase of the costing model to see if this fits us better in terms of revenue and margins. We are looking forward to experiencing the AA cloud soon.
Pricing is affordable and I would recommend beginning with the Starter Package.
I don't deal have cost specifics but I can say it is a tool that provides value for the money.
The one-time setup cost can be fully recovered with the ROI achievement within six months, provided the implementation of bots is planned properly. The pricing and licensing are definitely moderate to costly but easily recoverable by achieving ROI quickly. Our setup cost was only procuring AWS instances but installations are performed in-house.
The price of this product is good.
I advise users or prospective buyers of this product to know more about the features they offer before diving in with this solution, pricing-wise. It is one of the most affordable RPA solutions, and as for licensing, they offer a community edition that greatly helps anyone who aspires to learn about the product before buying the enterprise solution. It will give them an overview of the features and functionalities that they will encounter when using the robot.
My only suggestion in terms of pricing is very generic and that is to consider that as much as RPA saves cost and does automation, please get a realistic estimation done on whether you are really achieving any ROI over your investment with RPA. Once you are sure about it, go for it.
The licensing model and cost are very impressive. Now, you do not have to worry about infra setup cost like Server, Database as it comes free of cost with the A2019 cloud version.
The price between distributor and partner is different, especially in terms of the discount. We cannot lock the discount from partner to distribution, so we still have a different price.
The setup cost for this is onetime and licensing is based on your choice of product.
It's cheapest among the competition, although bargaining is a must. Different licenses are for Bot Runner and Bot Creator, which saves on the cost.
The cost of this solution is a little bit high, but it is worth the price.
It's an ideal pricing model to customize the components based on everyone's needs.
With the newer cloud version of Automation Anywhere product, the setup cost has been cut down because the customer doesn't need to invest in new hardware. Automation Anywhere is flexible in terms of costing and licensing.
I really enjoy the pricing options with Automation Anywhere, as they are able to flex their ability to adapt to the needs of the customer really well. I am sure the specifics for some pricing are on a partner-by-partner basis but providing the ability to scale the licenses, setup, and pricing to the customer is a huge benefit with Automation Anywhere. Their technical support system and response times directly to a partner are really good.
The price is very reasonable.
This is a comprehensive automation offering with a scalable architecture and flexible pricing models. This keeps the RPA TCO low and you can automate with confidence.
In terms of pricing, this is a good product.
Regarding the price, licensing, and maintenance, Automation Anywhere provides its customers with its best and affordable value.
They're very flexible around pricing and licensing.
The setup cost depends on multiple factors, so you need to get details before choosing.
The cost can be reduced a little for users.
I am not in charge regarding this matter.