Team Lead-IT service Management at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Nov 28, 2022
We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable.
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Consultant
Nov 13, 2018
I like the licensing model because it's device-based. It makes it easier for us, as a managed service provider, to bill our customers. We are paid per device and the license per device makes it easy for us.
Network Specialist at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Jul 23, 2018
I believe the product's pricing is a good value at this point. We're currently trying to internally evaluate everything that we use. It's moot in that it falls under the same umbrella that Spectrum does, and Spectrum is an integral part of the tool. It is used by a lot of departments within our agency to monitor the network up/down. So, it's a part of that umbrella, they're included together. With that, the pricing is fine. Many years back they changed the way that they did licensing and that was good. Since then, everything has been just fine.
CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).
The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved...
The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.
I do not have any details regarding the pricing.
I am the monitoring engineer. I provide configuration, integration, and support. Pricing and licensing issues are handled by other managers.
We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable.
The licensing is very straightforward. It doesn't matter how many devices you have and would like to monitor—it's very straightforward.
I like the licensing model because it's device-based. It makes it easier for us, as a managed service provider, to bill our customers. We are paid per device and the license per device makes it easy for us.
I believe the product's pricing is a good value at this point. We're currently trying to internally evaluate everything that we use. It's moot in that it falls under the same umbrella that Spectrum does, and Spectrum is an integral part of the tool. It is used by a lot of departments within our agency to monitor the network up/down. So, it's a part of that umbrella, they're included together. With that, the pricing is fine. Many years back they changed the way that they did licensing and that was good. Since then, everything has been just fine.