Senior Software Engineer at Denso Ten Solutions Philippines Corporation
Real User
Jan 27, 2023
There are different licenses, we have the application and the online application. There are two different licenses for two different program sites for the Magic xpa Application Platform.
Senior Associate - IT at Himalaya Wellness Company
Real User
Dec 16, 2022
For an organization, it's okay. For an individual person or for a small startup, the license cost is high. It's a bit expensive, but since we have flexibility of usage, it's worth the cost.
The licensing cost varies because nowadays Magic has tailor-made offerings for clients, including one-time use licenses. It also depends on how you are using the solution. Are you using a web application? Because that's a different license strategy than native Magic applications. For a web application, you only pay for the engine that runs on the web server and it doesn't matter if you are servicing 100 users or 100,000 users. You cannot convert that cost into a cost per user. I think the solution is worth the money.
The licensing is too costly. The runtime cost is very expensive, especially in respect of a big server with many clients. So too, the development tool is expensive, as is the yearly maintenance cost. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee. In spite of the solution's high cost, we see a very large return on our investment. It allows one to develop extremely fast and make specific customized solutions to fit the bill of each customer with tremendous simplicity. As such, the solution seems worth its high expense.
CEO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Nov 13, 2019
The pricing for the product is a little high. The problem is the license for the development version of xpa has to be paid for, and then also the runtime has to be paid in addition. So it is not an optimal solution for a developer because of the additional runtime costs.
It's not cheap. The licenses are not cheap. Not at all. They cost much money. There are other tools with free licenses but Magic asks for a lot of money.
Learn what your peers think about Magic xpa Application Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
Magic xpa Application Platform is known for its fast development speed and extensive platform support. It efficiently handles database operations and integrates well with systems like Oracle, supporting Windows, Android, and iOS applications.Magic xpa Application Platform offers rapid development capabilities, robust database connectivity, and versatile platform support. It integrates seamlessly with systems like Oracle, uses in-memory databases efficiently, and offers flexibility in database...
There are different licenses, we have the application and the online application. There are two different licenses for two different program sites for the Magic xpa Application Platform.
For an organization, it's okay. For an individual person or for a small startup, the license cost is high. It's a bit expensive, but since we have flexibility of usage, it's worth the cost.
The licensing cost varies because nowadays Magic has tailor-made offerings for clients, including one-time use licenses. It also depends on how you are using the solution. Are you using a web application? Because that's a different license strategy than native Magic applications. For a web application, you only pay for the engine that runs on the web server and it doesn't matter if you are servicing 100 users or 100,000 users. You cannot convert that cost into a cost per user. I think the solution is worth the money.
The licensing is too costly. The runtime cost is very expensive, especially in respect of a big server with many clients. So too, the development tool is expensive, as is the yearly maintenance cost. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee. In spite of the solution's high cost, we see a very large return on our investment. It allows one to develop extremely fast and make specific customized solutions to fit the bill of each customer with tremendous simplicity. As such, the solution seems worth its high expense.
The pricing for the product is a little high. The problem is the license for the development version of xpa has to be paid for, and then also the runtime has to be paid in addition. So it is not an optimal solution for a developer because of the additional runtime costs.
It's not cheap. The licenses are not cheap. Not at all. They cost much money. There are other tools with free licenses but Magic asks for a lot of money.