Sr. Manager IT Datacentre Cloud and Network at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Oct 7, 2025
Regarding pricing for Microsoft Azure Object Storage, I find it reasonable; if I talk about blob, it is a reasonable price. It is reasonable money for the product.
The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is cheaper compared to other competitors, such as Google or third-party solutions, which easily engages customers. They also get multiple services that provide dedicated storage in terms of OneDrive along with SharePoint, giving customers an additional benefit.
I can't share a lot about the costs. I am focused on the technical aspect. It's a pay-per-use solution and a good idea for proof of concept and value. If I want to test a product before deploying it in my data center or even in the cloud, this might be a good solution. There are many access tiers available. It's not as developed as in Adobe. That said, it is a good solution overall.
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is an expensive solution. We need to pay a monthly licensing fee for the solution. We need to pay extra setup cost in addition to the standard licensing fees.
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure Object Storage. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
The tool has a pay-per-use pricing model. You need to pay for what you are consuming. It is not a complex model. It is not an expensive product. There is no need to pay extra money for the licensing costs since the price is based on the storage you consume.
The solution is expensive. However, we can choose to get a budget-friendly license. The vendor should offer extensions on the licenses. People are still working on on-premise servers. If we want them to move to the cloud, the vendors must provide competitive prices. We have a couple of small to medium businesses. The solution is not affordable for small businesses.
Senior Engineering Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Jun 29, 2023
The pricing can be improved. There is an yearly licensing cost for the solution. There are some reserve instances that are additional to the licensing cost.
DevOps and Cloud Engineer at Neudesic Technologies Private Limited
Real User
Jun 28, 2022
Microsoft Azure Object Storage requires a license. We use a pay-as-you-go model and we have an enterprise subscription model as well. The solution is not expensive, however, when compared to other enterprise, pay-as-you-go products, it is priced higher.
Information Technology & Cloud Systems Manager at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees
Real User
May 27, 2022
It has a pay-as-you-go model. So, you are only paying for what you store. It's an attractive model. You don't pay for a set; you pay for what you actually use.
Manager-Platform Team / Technical Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Reseller
May 24, 2022
The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is monthly. We have two types of licenses. One is the EA enterprise license and the other is a CSP license.
Owner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Mar 15, 2021
Pricing is always confusing for all Microsoft products. For this solution, they do provide the estimates, but it is not easy to guess the exact amount that we will be billed.
REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud
Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
Power big data analytics
Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Microsoft Azure Object Storage is very good.
Regarding pricing for Microsoft Azure Object Storage, I find it reasonable; if I talk about blob, it is a reasonable price. It is reasonable money for the product.
The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is cheaper compared to other competitors, such as Google or third-party solutions, which easily engages customers. They also get multiple services that provide dedicated storage in terms of OneDrive along with SharePoint, giving customers an additional benefit.
I can't share a lot about the costs. I am focused on the technical aspect. It's a pay-per-use solution and a good idea for proof of concept and value. If I want to test a product before deploying it in my data center or even in the cloud, this might be a good solution. There are many access tiers available. It's not as developed as in Adobe. That said, it is a good solution overall.
The pricing is higher than CNC. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the pricing as six to seven.
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is an expensive solution. We need to pay a monthly licensing fee for the solution. We need to pay extra setup cost in addition to the standard licensing fees.
The price will be more competitive when we increase the time spent using the tool. For our company's size range, I think the price is okay.
The pricing is competitive.
The tool has a pay-per-use pricing model. You need to pay for what you are consuming. It is not a complex model. It is not an expensive product. There is no need to pay extra money for the licensing costs since the price is based on the storage you consume.
Our storage capacity is cheap because we have a committed discount.
The tool's licensing costs are annual. It should be made reasonable.
With Microsoft Azure Object Storage, you pay for the data you have stored there. You can download the application from Microsoft free of charge.
The solution is expensive. However, we can choose to get a budget-friendly license. The vendor should offer extensions on the licenses. People are still working on on-premise servers. If we want them to move to the cloud, the vendors must provide competitive prices. We have a couple of small to medium businesses. The solution is not affordable for small businesses.
We don't need to pay for the solution's license.
The solution has a monthly licensing fee.
I would rate the pricing a four out of ten because there is a lot of competition out there.
I rate Azure Blob storage's pricing a seven out of ten. Additional costs depend on the data and complexity of the project.
The pricing can be improved. There is an yearly licensing cost for the solution. There are some reserve instances that are additional to the licensing cost.
Currently, it is a flexible price policy.
Licensing fess are charged monthly.
I can't speak to the exact licensing costs.
Object Storage is competitively priced.
Microsoft Azure Object Storage requires a license. We use a pay-as-you-go model and we have an enterprise subscription model as well. The solution is not expensive, however, when compared to other enterprise, pay-as-you-go products, it is priced higher.
It has a pay-as-you-go model. So, you are only paying for what you store. It's an attractive model. You don't pay for a set; you pay for what you actually use.
The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is monthly. We have two types of licenses. One is the EA enterprise license and the other is a CSP license.
Pricing is always confusing for all Microsoft products. For this solution, they do provide the estimates, but it is not easy to guess the exact amount that we will be billed.
The cost of this solution is high compared to others, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
For the cloud, you get charges every day if you are going to download anything, besides the cost for storage those charges are always there.
We have a separate package and pay extra for additional technical support.
The cost is based on the amount of traffic and we paid approximately 18 lakh Rupees ($25,000 USD) last year.