The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or medium businesses.
For enterprise customers, the cost is manageable because it provides solutions for multiple applications they want to automate. It is comparable to free tools like Selenium, which cannot be competed with due to their cost-free nature.
The tool is expensive. It has become overpriced, especially after Tricentis Tosca grew as a company. Initially, we bought a license with an annual support fee, which wasn't too expensive. However, they changed the model, and now we have to purchase a license yearly, which has become quite costly.
It is more expensive compared to other tools on the market. The cost is a significant factor, and while we try to build client confidence, it’s still a challenge. When the licensing costs are introduced, some clients hesitate or even opt-out.
The price of the tool is a problem for a lot of Brazilian clients or Latino clients, as it is expensive. Where I work, if one is low price and ten is high price, I rate the tool's price as a ten out of ten. Everybody here understands that it is a really expensive tool. My company also has some clients from the USA or Munich, and even if it is more expensive than the other tools, it is easier to sell the solution. Overall, I can rate the product price as a nine or ten because most of the clients are from Brazil.
There are different types of licenses: enterprise or professional. The cost varies. The enterprise license is expensive. They have an extra option for the same license, but the price depends on various factors.
Senior Test Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
Apr 26, 2024
The product is very costly. The licensing model of Tricentis Tosca is tightly bound to user roles and activities, making it complex to manage. There are distinctions between test users and test runs, which can lead to some confusion. It would be beneficial if test developers were less restricted in their usage, perhaps by allocating licensing based more on test runs than individual developers. This could facilitate greater involvement of testers in test development without significantly increasing costs, as licensing could be based on usage metrics rather than individual user accounts
I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side. There are open-source tools available, and there are other tools available that are much smaller. If you are looking at commercials, then there are options available that are newer.
The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. It used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive. The price of the solution does not include all features available. If you need a BI solution or API testing, then you have to pay extra. I rate the price of Tricentis Tosca a two out of five.
Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's...
The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or medium businesses.
Tricentis Tosca is quite expensive. A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros, compared to TestComplete, which is about 5,000 to 8,000 euros.
For enterprise customers, the cost is manageable because it provides solutions for multiple applications they want to automate. It is comparable to free tools like Selenium, which cannot be competed with due to their cost-free nature.
The licensing is too high.
The tool is expensive. It has become overpriced, especially after Tricentis Tosca grew as a company. Initially, we bought a license with an annual support fee, which wasn't too expensive. However, they changed the model, and now we have to purchase a license yearly, which has become quite costly.
It is more expensive compared to other tools on the market. The cost is a significant factor, and while we try to build client confidence, it’s still a challenge. When the licensing costs are introduced, some clients hesitate or even opt-out.
The price of the tool is a problem for a lot of Brazilian clients or Latino clients, as it is expensive. Where I work, if one is low price and ten is high price, I rate the tool's price as a ten out of ten. Everybody here understands that it is a really expensive tool. My company also has some clients from the USA or Munich, and even if it is more expensive than the other tools, it is easier to sell the solution. Overall, I can rate the product price as a nine or ten because most of the clients are from Brazil.
There are different types of licenses: enterprise or professional. The cost varies. The enterprise license is expensive. They have an extra option for the same license, but the price depends on various factors.
Although the product is slightly more expensive than tools like Selenium, its automation capabilities and reduced scripting needs justify the cost.
The product is very costly. The licensing model of Tricentis Tosca is tightly bound to user roles and activities, making it complex to manage. There are distinctions between test users and test runs, which can lead to some confusion. It would be beneficial if test developers were less restricted in their usage, perhaps by allocating licensing based more on test runs than individual developers. This could facilitate greater involvement of testers in test development without significantly increasing costs, as licensing could be based on usage metrics rather than individual user accounts
The tool is quite expensive.
The tool's pricing is lower than that of other automation tools.
The product has a costly license. It costs around $700-900/ year.
Tricentis Tosca should improve its pricing. It is expensive.
I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side. There are open-source tools available, and there are other tools available that are much smaller. If you are looking at commercials, then there are options available that are newer.
On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis.
The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. It used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive. The price of the solution does not include all features available. If you need a BI solution or API testing, then you have to pay extra. I rate the price of Tricentis Tosca a two out of five.
The pricing of the solution comes as part of our Tosca bundle, so we're happy with that.