Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.
We have a yearly basis license. We don't find it too expensive for our use case. It helps us harmonize processes and those processes result in significant effort saving, then the product is paid for itself.
Senior Risk & Compliance Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Feb 8, 2024
SAP Signavio charges a lot of money. It's 2,500 per annum for an enterprise license and 30 pounds per annum for a collaboration license, which you have to buy in 500. So, it's 500 lots of 30 pounds every year plus however many enterprise licenses you want to use. We're talking about 1,50,000 a year for what we use. If we were to increase that, that would be about 2,00,000 a year. ARIS costs 1,75,000 a year. Pricing for both solutions is comparable to a certain extent. To me, that's still an extortionate amount of money for letting us use the tool, and we're still paying for it. However, they're not giving us any support.
Learn what your peers think about SAP Signavio Process Manager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
Global BPM Professional at a renewables & environment company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Dec 21, 2021
Due to the fact that Signavio is now part of SAP, the prices have been raised. I don't like that, of course, because we're a customer. And what I really don't like is that when they introduced their customer Journey Modeler, we signed up for a beta version and they said to us that we could use this version for the next year without having to pay anything for it. Three months later they said, "Okay, so now the beta version is finished and you have to buy the licenses." And those licenses are really expensive. In comparison to Process Manager, it's not reasonable. The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot.
Process Manager at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Dec 5, 2021
Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives.
Process Excellence Manager at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Nov 1, 2021
There is a rather high cost for the Process Manager licenses, however, costs can go down if there are more modules from the Business Transformation Suite added to the contract.
Senior lecturer and researcher at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Sep 29, 2021
We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool.
Head of Business Process Management at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Jul 28, 2020
Due to COVID the deployment program took place remote via GoToMeeting. But it worked very well and the whole program was well prepared and very helpful for us. We chose the premium deployment program, which allowed us to continue with monthly Q&A sessions with Signavio. This was very helpful for us and together with the Signavio consultant, it was more like a real team-work. We really appreciate that. Signavio is not the cheapest provider but also high value.
Principal Business Process Architect at Met Office
Real User
Top 5
Nov 26, 2019
Signavio is about the same price or cheaper compared to IBM Blueworks Live. The Collaboration Hub is an annual cost and enables 1,000 users to navigate published content without the need for a license (you can configure it to certain email or network scopes).
I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable. The biggest investment is in training the people, and building up the processes and discussing how it should be. That's where a lot of time goes. That's where the money goes. For me, this equilibrium is very good. The money should not go into licenses, but rather the big value is in the content in the end.
Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Jun 11, 2019
Signavio actually worked out a fair bit less expensive for us than some of the competitors. We negotiated an enterprise license for up to 30,000 users for certain components and a per-user license for other components based on our need for those. The company was very flexible in price negotiations in terms of the overall solution. We are paying in the region about eight hundred thousand dollars a year for an enterprise license. There's nothing in addition to that unless we want additional capacity or features.
The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.
Over 1 million users in more...
The price of SAP Signavio Process Manager was quite high but could be afforded by an organization with a sensitive data scale.
After SAP acquired Signavio, the prices increased significantly, making it too expensive for our small company to afford.
Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.
We have SAP Signavio Process Manager and Collaboration Hub licenses, and the company is fine with them.
We have a yearly basis license. We don't find it too expensive for our use case. It helps us harmonize processes and those processes result in significant effort saving, then the product is paid for itself.
SAP Signavio charges a lot of money. It's 2,500 per annum for an enterprise license and 30 pounds per annum for a collaboration license, which you have to buy in 500. So, it's 500 lots of 30 pounds every year plus however many enterprise licenses you want to use. We're talking about 1,50,000 a year for what we use. If we were to increase that, that would be about 2,00,000 a year. ARIS costs 1,75,000 a year. Pricing for both solutions is comparable to a certain extent. To me, that's still an extortionate amount of money for letting us use the tool, and we're still paying for it. However, they're not giving us any support.
I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price.
The solution is expensive. It is suitable for huge enterprises.
I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten.
The product is expensive.
It is expensive. The license is monthly.
The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors.
Comparatively, it is a bit costly when you look at similar tools with similar features.
Due to the fact that Signavio is now part of SAP, the prices have been raised. I don't like that, of course, because we're a customer. And what I really don't like is that when they introduced their customer Journey Modeler, we signed up for a beta version and they said to us that we could use this version for the next year without having to pay anything for it. Three months later they said, "Okay, so now the beta version is finished and you have to buy the licenses." And those licenses are really expensive. In comparison to Process Manager, it's not reasonable. The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot.
Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives.
There is a rather high cost for the Process Manager licenses, however, costs can go down if there are more modules from the Business Transformation Suite added to the contract.
We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool.
SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees.
The offered deployment services are worth the money and will help you to get started.
Due to COVID the deployment program took place remote via GoToMeeting. But it worked very well and the whole program was well prepared and very helpful for us. We chose the premium deployment program, which allowed us to continue with monthly Q&A sessions with Signavio. This was very helpful for us and together with the Signavio consultant, it was more like a real team-work. We really appreciate that. Signavio is not the cheapest provider but also high value.
Please check your scope of application and choose and negotiate the right pricing model
Signavio is about the same price or cheaper compared to IBM Blueworks Live. The Collaboration Hub is an annual cost and enables 1,000 users to navigate published content without the need for a license (you can configure it to certain email or network scopes).
I know other models, that have concurrent licenses, and I love it. It would be easier to promote it in this way.
My client purchased one editor license and the Collaboration Hub, which covers up to a hundred people.
I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable. The biggest investment is in training the people, and building up the processes and discussing how it should be. That's where a lot of time goes. That's where the money goes. For me, this equilibrium is very good. The money should not go into licenses, but rather the big value is in the content in the end.
I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs.
Signavio actually worked out a fair bit less expensive for us than some of the competitors. We negotiated an enterprise license for up to 30,000 users for certain components and a per-user license for other components based on our need for those. The company was very flexible in price negotiations in terms of the overall solution. We are paying in the region about eight hundred thousand dollars a year for an enterprise license. There's nothing in addition to that unless we want additional capacity or features.
This solution provides good value for the money.