I have experience with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Netwrix Endpoint Protector, as I am currently working with both. My experience is primarily with Forcepoint. I am mostly working with Forcepoint DLP, Web Proxy, Data Classification, and I handle total implementation and operations by myself. I have hands-on experience with Forcepoint DLP, CASB, DLP, and Web Proxy, which means three products. I also have hands-on experience with Fortra DLP, which means Digital Guardian, and I have experience with SentinelOne EDR as well. Additionally, I am currently trying out Fortinet Firewall. I do not have experience with Forcepoint's Next-Generation Firewall as I just started with Fortinet Firewall. I have hands-on experience with Forcepoint CASB, but I am not totally dependent on it. My focus is on DLP, Web Proxy, and Data Classification. I know how CASB works, and I have nearly five years of experience with DLP, Web Proxy, and Data Classification.
Our primary use case for Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP ( /products/forcepoint-risk-adaptive-protection-for-dlp-reviews ) is in the banking environment. We deal with multiple compliance requirements like PCI, DHS, PDP act, and CBSL regulation in Sri Lanka. These regulations require banking and financial institutions to have DLP ( /categories/data-loss-prevention-dlp ) solutions in place, and Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP ( /products/forcepoint-risk-adaptive-protection-for-dlp-reviews ) helps us meet these compliance needs.
Our main use cases are monitoring, classification, and auto-discovery. Auto-discovery is required for existing protection, and data classification is a newly added feature still under development by a third party. We also use it for email, file, and folder data classification. Risk monitoring is an add-on, but it still relies on the same platform. Overall, discovery and classification are the most essential features for us.
Learn what your peers think about Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2026.
Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP offers dynamic security measures tailored to data protection needs, ensuring sensitive information is safeguarded efficiently.Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is designed to provide a balanced approach to data loss prevention by adapting security measures based on real-time risk assessment. This innovative system prioritizes protecting sensitive information while allowing for seamless workflow integration, making it a suitable choice for...
I have experience with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Netwrix Endpoint Protector, as I am currently working with both. My experience is primarily with Forcepoint. I am mostly working with Forcepoint DLP, Web Proxy, Data Classification, and I handle total implementation and operations by myself. I have hands-on experience with Forcepoint DLP, CASB, DLP, and Web Proxy, which means three products. I also have hands-on experience with Fortra DLP, which means Digital Guardian, and I have experience with SentinelOne EDR as well. Additionally, I am currently trying out Fortinet Firewall. I do not have experience with Forcepoint's Next-Generation Firewall as I just started with Fortinet Firewall. I have hands-on experience with Forcepoint CASB, but I am not totally dependent on it. My focus is on DLP, Web Proxy, and Data Classification. I know how CASB works, and I have nearly five years of experience with DLP, Web Proxy, and Data Classification.
Our primary use case for Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP ( /products/forcepoint-risk-adaptive-protection-for-dlp-reviews ) is in the banking environment. We deal with multiple compliance requirements like PCI, DHS, PDP act, and CBSL regulation in Sri Lanka. These regulations require banking and financial institutions to have DLP ( /categories/data-loss-prevention-dlp ) solutions in place, and Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP ( /products/forcepoint-risk-adaptive-protection-for-dlp-reviews ) helps us meet these compliance needs.
Our main use cases are monitoring, classification, and auto-discovery. Auto-discovery is required for existing protection, and data classification is a newly added feature still under development by a third party. We also use it for email, file, and folder data classification. Risk monitoring is an add-on, but it still relies on the same platform. Overall, discovery and classification are the most essential features for us.
We use it exclusively for data loss prevention.