I am still working with PTC Integrity because we have a lot of customizations and we have been working for the past 10 years on it. We are planning and proposing to go to a different tool such as Codebeamer, but since our customers are still using Integrity, we cannot have a one-to-one replica or mirror replica of Integrity with Codebeamer because our customization is very high. That is the reason I am still working with Integrity itself. PTC Integrity's key use case is document management and requirement management. However, the use case which we are using is glossary management, test order management, and product chain management, which means document product chain management. These are the things which we use it for primarily: document chain management, glossary management, and requirement management. As a generic ALM tool, we use it for all three of these, and also for test order management. The reason is because we had test order in some other tool and we wanted a fast way to import it into a reliable tool five to six years back. The only reliable tool at that time was PTC Integrity, and nothing such as Codebeamer existed at that time, and we did not have any AI during that period. PTC Integrity was something which was used in NASA and by companies such as Boeing and all the major aeronautical manufacturing industries. This was the go-to tool for everything, particularly for whoever had indulged in customization.
Lead Engineer at a transportation company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Feb 28, 2025
In our organization, we use PTC Integrity ( /products/ptc-integrity-reviews ) for Lifecycle Management applications, particularly for our drawing release activities. It provides a common platform for both hardware and software, allowing us to streamline these processes.
Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Mar 16, 2020
I am a solution manager and I manage a portfolio of applications in the company. We have been conducting a PTC Integrity pilot. We use it for documentation and requirements management. We do not use it for test management, yet. It is for requirements collection and then creating and maintaining specification documents.
Technical Leader at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Feb 11, 2020
Our primary use case is for all kinds of data management right through to test case management. We have offices in both Germany and India with about 600 licenses in total.
Software Developer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Sep 15, 2019
I mainly used PTC to make a JIRA-like tool so that people can work with Agile. I think it has more features as presented by PTC. However, we mainly used this solution for item management, change requests, item tracking, etc. The second thing we used it for was version control.
The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
I am still working with PTC Integrity because we have a lot of customizations and we have been working for the past 10 years on it. We are planning and proposing to go to a different tool such as Codebeamer, but since our customers are still using Integrity, we cannot have a one-to-one replica or mirror replica of Integrity with Codebeamer because our customization is very high. That is the reason I am still working with Integrity itself. PTC Integrity's key use case is document management and requirement management. However, the use case which we are using is glossary management, test order management, and product chain management, which means document product chain management. These are the things which we use it for primarily: document chain management, glossary management, and requirement management. As a generic ALM tool, we use it for all three of these, and also for test order management. The reason is because we had test order in some other tool and we wanted a fast way to import it into a reliable tool five to six years back. The only reliable tool at that time was PTC Integrity, and nothing such as Codebeamer existed at that time, and we did not have any AI during that period. PTC Integrity was something which was used in NASA and by companies such as Boeing and all the major aeronautical manufacturing industries. This was the go-to tool for everything, particularly for whoever had indulged in customization.
In our organization, we use PTC Integrity ( /products/ptc-integrity-reviews ) for Lifecycle Management applications, particularly for our drawing release activities. It provides a common platform for both hardware and software, allowing us to streamline these processes.
We use the tool for Application Lifecycle Management. It's an ALM tool to manage the product from inception to providing support and maintenance.
We use PTC Integrity for version control purposes.
Our primary use case is to develop tasks and controls.
I am a solution manager and I manage a portfolio of applications in the company. We have been conducting a PTC Integrity pilot. We use it for documentation and requirements management. We do not use it for test management, yet. It is for requirements collection and then creating and maintaining specification documents.
This solution is used for lifecycle management.
Our primary use case is for all kinds of data management right through to test case management. We have offices in both Germany and India with about 600 licenses in total.
We were evaluating PTC Integrity for the deployment for one of my clients. The major problem we faced regarding Integrity are the developments.
I mainly used PTC to make a JIRA-like tool so that people can work with Agile. I think it has more features as presented by PTC. However, we mainly used this solution for item management, change requests, item tracking, etc. The second thing we used it for was version control.