Network Security Manager at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jan 20, 2026
There are probably some strict agreements, and the answers are probably not so rapid. It is just a matter of setting the right expectations. The responsiveness could at least be improved, but I have not had many cases, just a few.
Enterprise Security Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
Nov 4, 2025
I would like to see a bunch of templated or policy-driven provisioning for DNSSEC in the next release of Infoblox BloxOne DDI. Additionally, I would like to see DNS hosting so you do not have to deploy the NIOS appliances yourself or manage another cloud DNS service. This would allow you to pare back your DNS registration and hosting to just registrar services. That way, you would have a fully integrated, vertically integrated API stack for being able to affect all of your automated changes against your actual public authorities as well rather than just your internal resolvers and authorities. I think that would be something quite cool for them to have.
Infoblox BloxOne DDI is good to use, but there could be improvements in its visualization and dashboarding UI. While the current functionalities and dashboard are good, better reporting and more flexibility in adding devices would enhance the solution. Additionally, access control could be expanded to give read-only permissions to more users and incorporate AI features for better automation.
There is a need for a comprehensive database on DNS. When a new attack occurs, the database requires timely updates. The existing database is updated frequently, but continuous improvements would be beneficial.
At this stage, we are struggling to use some of the DNS features of the platform, which are more about protecting your domain from hijacking and similar threats. However, I don't think it is a problem with the platform itself. It seems to be more of an integration issue with the secondary DNS provider we are trying to use on the Internet, called Cloudflare. So, it is more of an integration problem between Cloudflare DNS and any public DNS. I would like to improve the integration aspect of these two products. The platform should be able to work seamlessly with any other secondary DNS provider on the Internet. If Infoblox can make their licensing cheaper, then this platform could be widely used because it does cost a fortune to have it. That's why we do not have it in every entity that we manage.
Infoblox BloxOne DDI is an advanced service that integrates DNS, DHCP, and IP address management capabilities, designed to streamline network operations and scalability.Infoblox BloxOne DDI is tailored for cloud-first architectures, offering flexible deployment options across private, public, and hybrid cloud environments. It addresses the complexities of modern networks, enabling dynamic scaling and automating core network services. The system supports best-in-class security features and...
There are probably some strict agreements, and the answers are probably not so rapid. It is just a matter of setting the right expectations. The responsiveness could at least be improved, but I have not had many cases, just a few.
I would like to see a bunch of templated or policy-driven provisioning for DNSSEC in the next release of Infoblox BloxOne DDI. Additionally, I would like to see DNS hosting so you do not have to deploy the NIOS appliances yourself or manage another cloud DNS service. This would allow you to pare back your DNS registration and hosting to just registrar services. That way, you would have a fully integrated, vertically integrated API stack for being able to affect all of your automated changes against your actual public authorities as well rather than just your internal resolvers and authorities. I think that would be something quite cool for them to have.
Infoblox BloxOne DDI is good to use, but there could be improvements in its visualization and dashboarding UI. While the current functionalities and dashboard are good, better reporting and more flexibility in adding devices would enhance the solution. Additionally, access control could be expanded to give read-only permissions to more users and incorporate AI features for better automation.
There is a need for a comprehensive database on DNS. When a new attack occurs, the database requires timely updates. The existing database is updated frequently, but continuous improvements would be beneficial.
At this stage, we are struggling to use some of the DNS features of the platform, which are more about protecting your domain from hijacking and similar threats. However, I don't think it is a problem with the platform itself. It seems to be more of an integration issue with the secondary DNS provider we are trying to use on the Internet, called Cloudflare. So, it is more of an integration problem between Cloudflare DNS and any public DNS. I would like to improve the integration aspect of these two products. The platform should be able to work seamlessly with any other secondary DNS provider on the Internet. If Infoblox can make their licensing cheaper, then this platform could be widely used because it does cost a fortune to have it. That's why we do not have it in every entity that we manage.