To improve ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer, they need to implement Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) support for firewalls and switches across their NMS products, as this would significantly save time; currently, they rely on CLI configurations and templates but are missing this modern feature.
Sr. Presales & Technical Lead at Elitbuzz Technologies Ltd
Real User
Top 5
May 2, 2024
What is happening in sometimes, if any issues found in the tool, ManageEngine takes time to provide a proper fix, but it does not happen most of the time. If there is a need to get some customized report or feature, ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer team takes some time. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement. From a product point of view, the tool is good, user-friendly, and offers easy installation and easy configuration.
Analyst of Budgets and Financial and Administrative Information at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Jul 22, 2022
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer can improve by having better monitoring of all features from firewalls. We are using Kibana in order to monitor parts that this solution does not record. For example, having more correlation and proactive monitoring in some activity or scenario.
Enterprise Architect - Information Security at a transportation company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Jan 30, 2020
The solution lacks a lot of features that other products have in the marketplace. The solution needs better visual representation and better reporting. The reports sometimes are not as good as what is offered by other competitors. The dashboard is sufficient, but it's not as intuitive as many competitor dashboards. The solution needs a better graphical visualization so that you can see the rules. Just generally, the solution needs to have the ability to do much more granular level visualizations. This is especially necessary around the policy engines. Users should be able to create network segmentation zones and then do what-if scenarios so that they can understand the impact and do more fine-grain impact analysis of new rules before deploying them.
Learn what your peers think about ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer simplifies firewall policy and network security management with log transparency and effective reporting. It supports multiple vendors and provides real-time traffic analysis, alerts, and monitoring for proactive issue investigation.ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer is designed for capturing logs from leading firewalls like Palo Alto, Cisco, Juniper, and FortiGate. It offers centralized rule management, compliance monitoring, and network security tracking through...
To improve ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer, they need to implement Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) support for firewalls and switches across their NMS products, as this would significantly save time; currently, they rely on CLI configurations and templates but are missing this modern feature.
What is happening in sometimes, if any issues found in the tool, ManageEngine takes time to provide a proper fix, but it does not happen most of the time. If there is a need to get some customized report or feature, ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer team takes some time. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement. From a product point of view, the tool is good, user-friendly, and offers easy installation and easy configuration.
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer can improve by having better monitoring of all features from firewalls. We are using Kibana in order to monitor parts that this solution does not record. For example, having more correlation and proactive monitoring in some activity or scenario.
I'm only using around 40 percent of the features, so I'm not sure what could be improved.
The solution lacks a lot of features that other products have in the marketplace. The solution needs better visual representation and better reporting. The reports sometimes are not as good as what is offered by other competitors. The dashboard is sufficient, but it's not as intuitive as many competitor dashboards. The solution needs a better graphical visualization so that you can see the rules. Just generally, the solution needs to have the ability to do much more granular level visualizations. This is especially necessary around the policy engines. Users should be able to create network segmentation zones and then do what-if scenarios so that they can understand the impact and do more fine-grain impact analysis of new rules before deploying them.
OEM needs to work on pricing, apart from the same current features which are effective and useful for any organization.
None, as I need it for the syslog portion. It would be awesome if the product could monitor services for applications.