Cesar Reza

Hi, XG is EOL the new series is XGS, both are excellent equipment but I prefer Fortigate, why ??? DHCP slection, leader SD-WAN, many IPSEC dynamics is possible on SOPHOS but is limit the are conflicts with many IP's dynamics you need to use DDNS, SSL tunnel for remote…

hi, if they have the personnel trained with EDR it is more than enough otherwise XDR is necessary, but the detail to review is the costs of XDR. Greetings

According to the datasheet, it can be the 400F, but I almost think that with 200F it can work without a problem, the detail is that XG is the previous generation. At the moment, they are the XGS of SOPHOS.

Both are very good products, but some features that Sophos mentioned as new, FortiGate has been handling. If you are going to grow with several appliances I recommend Sophos, since the administration can be done from the cloud. With Fortinet, you have to pay a licensing fee…

Especially with support and updates of the signatures, FortiGate has a more solid base. Being an IPO company, with respect to Pfsense, start as a community project and you can purchase support and even dedicated appliances if you have a budget for FortiGate, or if you are…

Untangle was born in the educational sector, and now it has been acquired by Arista in case you would like to check it out. Any solution is recommended, it all depends on the budget, you can also check pfSense which is free. fatpipeinc.com is a native solution for balancing…

thank you very much for the information Greetings

Properly there is no XG100 as I understand, but within that family ranging from 105 to 135, Fortigate can be an FG60, FG70, and FG80 all of them F series.

We have some time in the market and we have tested several manufacturers. Among the best is definitely RUCKUS, which also has all flavors, cloud, standalone, with a controller or an AP that can be used to control up to 75 APs if I remember correctly.

Usually, it is the Internet bandwidth, a number of users and (in the case of NGFW) you have to check if you are going to perform SSL filtering and application control, but lately, they are more concerned about the type of link to the Internet.  Almost all manufacturers have…

I forget to comment on some points, with respect to Netgear I have not had enough experience, but if I can comment a customer of Netgear wireless changed it to Ruckus, with respect to prices Aruba, Extreme and Ruckus are very similar, Allied has not quoted for a while.  It…

It depends on your budget, but here is a list -Extreme -Ruckus -Aruba -ALLIED TELESYN For data centers: Arista. Ruckus and Extreme: some models come from BROCADE, which is the best of the best for Fiber channel systems and switching for old virtualization systems. Extreme…

1 Ruckus 2 Aruba 3 Cambium It depends on your enviroment. Greetings

http://speedtest.googlefiber.net/et and if you have Ruckus with speedflex or https://fast.com, or from Windows store - WiFi Analyzer is free.

Good product, low cost (cheaper than Cisco) and I'd avoid DNA Cisco.

With Sophos is easy to configure and you have the support from the frabicant, with pfSense you have to learn from the community and learning curve is a little hard, last occasion with pfSense it don't have support for vpn dynamic, with Sophos they have RED equipment that…

Both types of equipment are good but the configuration on SOPHOS is very simple and clean but if you are more technical FortiGate is for you