Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Aruba Instant On Switches Logo

Aruba Instant On Switches Reviews

4.1 out of 5

What is Aruba Instant On Switches?

Featured Aruba Instant On Switches reviews

Aruba Instant On Switches mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Aruba Instant On Switches in the LAN Switching category stands at 9.7%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
LAN Switching Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Aruba Instant On Switches9.7%
Cisco Catalyst Switches27.7%
HPE ProCurve12.8%
Other49.8%
LAN Switching

PeerResearch reports based on Aruba Instant On Switches reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryLAN SwitchingAug 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAruba Instant On Switches vs Cisco Catalyst SwitchesAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAruba Instant On Switches vs Cisco NexusAug 29, 2025Download
ComparisonAruba Instant On Switches vs NETGEAR SwitchesAug 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
NETGEAR Switches4.17.3%88%56 interviewsAdd to research
Cisco Catalyst Switches4.327.7%95%177 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business78
Midsize Enterprise38
Large Enterprise81
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
University
8%
Performing Arts
6%
Government
6%
Wholesaler/Distributor
5%
Non Profit
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Retailer
4%
Legal Firm
4%
Construction Company
4%
Healthcare Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Financial Services Firm
2%
Media Company
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Wireless Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
 
Aruba Instant On Switches Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
System Engineer at University of Kelaniya3.5I use Aruba Instant On Switches for our network due to their ease of use, VLAN support, and cost-effectiveness, though I find Cisco better for CLI features and prefer more direct technical support access.
Senior Wireless Engineer at FASTtelco3.5No summary available
IT Manager at Bavaria Egypt S.A.E.3.5I use Aruba Instant On Switches in my company for connecting different locations. They offer features similar to Cisco, like VLAN and inter-VLAN routing, but need improvements in startup speed and configuration ease compared to NETGEAR and Cisco.
Sysnet Specialist at a educational organization with 11-50 employees3.5No summary available
Manager at MVO Traders4.0I use Aruba Instant On Switches mainly for camera connectivity and telecommunications, benefiting from easy remote management and VLAN configuration. The intuitive app interface and lack of additional hardware requirements make it preferable over alternatives like Ubiquiti.
Senior Network Engineer at Auckland University of Technology3.0I use Aruba Instant On Switches for a small number of users, appreciating their cost-effectiveness compared to Cisco. However, the complex setup and occasional connectivity issues limit their use, necessitating improvements in stability to improve deployment effectiveness.
Senior Network Engineer at AGSPL4.0The Aruba Instant On Switches offer an easy-to-use GUI, simplifying setup and cloud integration. However, more guidance on features and development of AI capabilities would be beneficial. We also consider alternatives like Cisco Meraki depending on customer preference.
Presale engineer at a wireless company with 51-200 employees4.5I primarily manage Aruba Instant On Switches via smartphone or laptop. They provide enterprise-grade quality at the lowest price and function well as Layer 2 switches. However, the solution could benefit from including more Layer 3 features.