Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Instant On Switches vs Cisco Catalyst Switches comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant On Switches
Ranking in LAN Switching
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Catalyst Switches
Ranking in LAN Switching
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
175
Ranking in other categories
Ethernet Switches (7th), Data Center Networking (1st), AV Over IP Switching (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant On Switches is 10.5%, up from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Catalyst Switches is 29.4%, down from 32.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
LAN Switching
 

Featured Reviews

MashukThakur - PeerSpot reviewer
A centrally managed switches ideal for small and medium businesses but does not have any console access
The solution does not have any console access. For example, if you do not have internet access on your side and you need to configure anything, you should at least have CLI access to do something or manage the solution to put to some IP. It will only work if we have a TSCT on the network. We can port and configure the initial settings before we get the Instant On Switches. I am not working deeply on Instant On devices. I have only installed it in a couple of accommodation sites. Even today, one customer has ordered to install 80 pieces of Instant On. I’ve to order additional 94 access points. I was confused about whether to go with Aruba Instant On or AP-505. Instant On has limited accessibility but AP-505 have cloud or local access on normal infrastructure. This would be better and easier to configure. So, there are further improvements in regard to console access and some limitations with access.
Joshua Odunsi - PeerSpot reviewer
Ensures efficient performance and supports network growth with optimal speed
Catalyst Switches are efficient and swift, which is valuable for my organization. I experience optimal speed and effective configuration, making them stand out compared to other switches. The PoE switches offer more ports on SFP, and it is efficient in use. Overall, the switches provide me with the value I expect in terms of speed and efficiency.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Regarding the feature, my clients are currently favoring it because it enables them to switch back to phone functionality."
"The product's initial setup phase is very simple."
"The cost and simplicity of the product are its most valuable features."
"The simplicity of the tool's GUI is good."
"The solution is plug-and-play and auto-configured."
"It is quite easy to maintain from the software point of view."
"The solution's pricing is slightly cheaper than that of Cisco."
"The most valuable features I find in Aruba Instant On switches include the access list and VLANs, along with other features such as security and cloud capabilities."
"Easy to manage, with a long lifespan."
"The product is reliable."
"It's easy to configure."
"I think it is a reliable and scalable solution."
"Overall top of the line solution."
"The solution is good for computation and backup."
"It is easy to use."
"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
 

Cons

"Its scalability needs improvement."
"In the next version, they should add a firewall from a single source."
"We would like to see more documentation."
"The product's startup speed is very bad, as it is very slow."
"Tracking with instant switches needs improvement."
"Some L3 features could be included in the solution."
"The pricing is competitive but could be improved."
"Some customers have made complaints about Aruba Instant On Switches' stability."
"Cisco needs to improve compatibility with other solutions and other vendors like SolarWinds. We've had problems using Catalyst with SolarWinds. Some devices can't be put on SolarWinds due to some ID Values and so on."
"When you compare it with HPE and Aruba, it should be fancier."
"The price of the product is very expensive."
"The product must improve its security."
"The configuration process is hard."
"The biggest issue we are having is with bugs and memory loss, which occurs when developing the IOS."
"In terms of what could be improved, more integration is the main thing they should be focused on."
"Their price should be improved. They are a little bit expensive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is quite low compared to other products, which is good for the customer."
"If one is very bad, and ten is a very good price, I rate the tool's price as a six."
"The solution is the cheapest A-class switch."
"Pricing is competitive, and there are no supplementary fees."
"Aruba Instant On Switches is cheaper than Cisco and expensive compared to some Chinese brand products."
"The license for Instant On Switches is free."
"We pay an annual licensing fee."
"The product has good pricing."
"It is very pricey. You have to pay for support."
"We love Cisco, but the price is very prohibitive."
"Pricing of Cisco equipment is high, but I think these switches are worth the price."
"​The price should go down instead of up. ​"
"The price of Cisco Catalyst switches is reasonable."
"It's overpriced and should be cheaper."
"It's expensive."
"I would rate the features-to-pricing ratio at six out of 10. My advice about licensing is that you should have a perpetual license, not one that is subscription-based."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Educational Organization
6%
Educational Organization
67%
Computer Software Company
6%
Government
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Instant On Switches?
The solution has a simple deployment and zero border.
What needs improvement with Aruba Instant On Switches?
I have run into a couple of problems with the switches. Recently, one of the newer stacks stopped working and had to be rebooted individually. They don't have a lot of diagnostics tools, which coul...
Would you recommend replacing a Cisco Catalyst Switch by a D-link one?
Hello Mesfin It depends on the real scenario, the cisco 2960 is a very good device and they usually have routing functions but there are many different models within the same 2960 line, and on the ...
What do you like most about Cisco Catalyst Switches?
We are a vendor for the healthcare sector, especially hospitals, and normally, we use a full Cisco solution for stability, especially for the stability of the Access Points and the security of swit...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Catalyst Switches?
Although Juniper is cheaper, Cisco provides unique features that justify their pricing.
 

Also Known As

Aruba Instant On 1930 Switches
Cisco Catalyst, Catalyst
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

KEMET, Vestavia Hills City Schools, Dropbox
Afni, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Del Papa Distributing, Explorer Pipeline, Mindtree, Omaha World Herald, Radio 538, Sony Corporation, Telecom Italia, Telenor Arena
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Cisco Catalyst Switches and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.