BlazeMeter Reviews

BlazeMeter positively impacts ROI by enhancing quality-of-service and reducing churn. It integrates well with tools like Jenkins for fast feedback, offering significant savings on infrastructure and maintenance costs. Users report cost savings over alternatives such as LoadRunner, allowing for reduced server usage by 50% and boosting scalability. Performance testing with BlazeMeter helps prevent outages, enhances productivity, and enables quicker delivery of features, ultimately saving time and decreasing labor expenses.

Enterprise users report BlazeMeter's pricing as generally reasonable but sometimes seen as high compared to other tools. Flexible licensing and custom contracts are available, offering competitive terms and discounts. Many appreciate BlazeMeter's value, especially for features like scalability and integration. However, the cost can be a significant consideration, particularly for startups or smaller organizations. Users value BlazeMeter's quality and customer support, often favoring this solution over cheaper alternatives with fewer features.

• "We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."
• "The product pricing is reasonable."
• "I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."

Organizations primarily utilize BlazeMeter for performance and load testing. They simulate heavy loads on applications to identify bottlenecks and ensure systems can handle high traffic levels before production. BlazeMeter offers capabilities such as API monitoring, GUI testing, and mock services, and integrates easily into DevOps environments. Its cloud-based nature enables distributed testing across various geographic locations, making it suitable for both on-premises and cloud environments, supporting enterprise-level testing requirements.

BlazeMeter customer service and support are praised for being responsive and helpful, with knowledgeable representatives often addressing queries promptly. Some users experience inconsistent response times and occasional reliance on documentation. Regular meetings and workshops are beneficial for users, ensuring issues are resolved efficiently. The support team is rated highly by many, although some users wish for faster initial responses. Multinational support and effective communication make BlazeMeter support commendable.

Many users found BlazeMeter's initial setup straightforward and user-friendly, with most setups requiring minimal time. Some challenges arose from configuring JMeter scripts, especially for applications needing JavaScript support. On-premises deployments benefited from Docker and Kubernetes, while SaaS models required simple script uploads. Maintenance of BlazeMeter was low, though some users noted dependency on their organization's infrastructure and technical expertise for implementation and security configurations.

BlazeMeter is praised for its scalability, handling a wide range of loads effectively. Many teams report no significant issues, even with high volumes, while others encountered setup delays but appreciate its adaptable performance. Ratings range from satisfactory to excellent. Users value its capability to support thousands of concurrent users, with scalable resources and cloud support facilitating flexible load management. Some organizations, however, faced challenges requiring additional tools for specific scenarios.

BlazeMeter is mostly stable, with users noting minor issues and occasional bugs. Some experience long wait times or trouble starting tests, while others mention reliable performance and quick issue resolution by BlazeMeter. Some users mark stability at various levels, commonly rating it a seven or eight out of ten. There are isolated incidents of stability problems, but many report no significant issues, appreciating the stable and reliable performance under most conditions.