Dell Storage Resource Manager offers centralized administration, real-time analytics, and efficient management of multiple storage arrays. Supporting multi-vendor environments, it enables proactive resource supervision and provisioning for organizations managing complex storage needs.



| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Dell Storage Resource Manager (SRM) | 5.7% |
| NetApp OnCommand Insight | 7.9% |
| SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor | 6.7% |
| Other | 79.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 25 |
Designed for ease of use, Dell Storage Resource Manager excels in delivering comprehensive insights through its dashboard, aiding proactive management of storage systems. It supports SANs, backup storage, and storage revisions, ensuring a seamless supervision experience. Despite its strengths, improvements in support response time, agent-based architecture, and interface stability are noted. Concerns regarding data security measures, fiber channel port reliability, and consolidated management underline the need for enhanced defense mechanisms. Financial sectors emphasize the urgency for robust cybersecurity to prevent unauthorized access and guarantee data integrity through techniques like air-gap solutions.
What features stand out in Dell Storage Resource Manager?Enterprises in the finance sector leverage Dell Storage Resource Manager for disk management, data progression, and backup across multiple storage platforms. Its capability to offer a comprehensive view of resources, including block-based storage and SSD accessibility, caters to industries prioritizing data integrity and continuity.
Dell Storage Resource Manager (SRM) was previously known as Dell EMC SRM, Dell EMC ViPR SRM, ViPR SRM, EMC ControlCenter, ECC, EMC ProSphere.
HNTB Corporation
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| First Assistant Vice President (FAVP) & Unit Head of Server & Storage Management Unit at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | Having used Dell SRM for 20 years, I find it excellent for provisioning, analytics, and multi-vendor management, with strong support. My key recommendation is for Dell to prioritize enhancing data security and air-gap solutions. |
| First Assistant Vice President (FAVP) & Unit Head of Server & Storage Management Unit at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | We use Dell Storage Resource Manager for block-based storage and various pools, particularly for Oracle databases. Its ease of control and storage supervision is valuable, though improvements in fiber channel port reliability and console management are needed. |
| Senior System Administrator at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees | 3.0 | I find the solution's partitions work well for backups. However, its technical support is inadequate, and the setup is complex. Despite being stable and scalable, I rate it a six out of ten due to these issues, preferring alternatives for new projects. |
| VP Global Infrastructure at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 3.5 | I use this solution for global storage management, appreciating its ease of use and reliability. However, I find technical support and the upgrade engineering team's knowledge needs significant improvement, impacting the overall experience. |
| Modern Data Center and Cloud Engineer II at IE Network Solutions PLC | 5.0 | I find this product easy to deploy and very effective for disk management, with many features. However, its support needs significant improvement due to slow response times and long issue resolution, which frustrates clients. |
| Architect at a tech company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I value SRM reporting. Past EMC ECC had support, cost, and resource issues, leading me to NetApp OCI. Now with ViPR SRM, which seems similar, I hope EMC continues listening to customer needs. |
| Senior Infrstructure Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I used this product for three years, valuing its multi-array management and good support. However, its stability and agent-based communication were issues. Frankly, I believe better solutions exist today, even from EMC. |
| Senior Storage Consultant at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | We've used this stable, scalable solution for five years, finding its centralized administration straightforward and beneficial for our EMC SANs. I would only wish for third-party storage management. |