Digital.ai Continuous Testing offers automated testing with real device cloud access and CI/CD integration to efficiently manage web and mobile app testing, ensuring reliability and consistency.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Digital.ai Continuous Testing | 6.5% |
| BrowserStack | 10.0% |
| Appvance AIQ Platform | 5.0% |
| Other | 78.5% |
Digital.ai Continuous Testing is designed to streamline testing by automating executions across multiple environments and devices, reducing manual efforts and speeding up feedback cycles. With features like cross-browser testing, and integration into CI/CD pipelines, it helps detect defects early and improve release quality. Users benefit from parallel and automated test executions for faster delivery and enhanced compatibility, leveraging Mobile Studio for versatile scripting. However, initial setup can be complex, and users note UI/UX improvements and issue navigation challenges. Despite these, it facilitates quality assurance through its comprehensive testing capabilities.
What are the key features of Digital.ai Continuous Testing?Industries utilize Digital.ai Continuous Testing to automate and integrate testing within CI/CD pipelines for web and mobile applications, improving application quality by testing across varied devices and environments. It enhances release quality and delivery speed by verifying new features, detecting bugs early, and supporting accessibility testing. This facilitates rapid feedback by prioritizing critical tests and maintaining stability pre-release.
Digital.ai Continuous Testing was previously known as Experitest Seetest, Experitest.
Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Cst Csd at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I leverage Digital.ai Continuous Testing for automated CI/CD test execution, valuing its early feedback and efficiency. While powerful, I've found its initial setup complex and UI/UX could be more intuitive for a smoother experience. |
| Senior Business Development Executive at DigitalTrack Solutions Ind Pvt Ltd | 4.0 | I use Digital.ai Continuous Testing for automated and real device testing, integrating it into CI/CD to ensure application quality. It significantly reduces testing time and manual effort, despite some initial setup complexity and occasional device access delays. |
| Business Development Executive at Digitaltrack | 4.0 | I find Digital.ai Continuous Testing excellent for scaled automation, cross-device testing, and CI/CD integration, significantly cutting release times and improving efficiency. Yet, initial setup and integration can be complex, needing careful planning. |
| PM at Galaxy Software Services | 4.0 | I use Digital.ai Continuous Testing to develop and test mobile apps, finding Mobile Studio's script generation highly valuable. Although integration is smooth, I encounter UI bugs with new releases. It enhances testing but doesn't directly reduce costs. |
| Quality Assurance Automation Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees | 3.0 | I use Experitest for native app testing, valuing its unique real device on the cloud and good documentation. However, setup was complicated, stability needs improvement, and direct support is lacking. I rate it 6/10. |
| Consultant at Testware ApS | 3.5 | I found Experitest valuable for its many real devices, essential for mobile accessibility testing. However, the initial setup and learning curve were complex, taking me two weeks to get started, despite the mid-range cost. |