Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Digital.ai and Worksoft are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Digital.ai is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Worksoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Digital.ai holds a 1.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to Worksoft’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 7 Digital.ai Continuous Testing reviews

1,684 Views
1,010 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 88 Worksoft Certify reviews

6,079 Views
4,316 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Worksoft Certify and Digital.ai Continuous Testing are competing products in software testing automation. Digital.ai Continuous Testing has an edge due to its advanced features, which some believe justify the cost difference.

Features: Worksoft Certify offers codeless test automation, comprehensive SAP testing capabilities, and an intuitive user interface. Digital.ai Continuous Testing provides AI-driven analytics, extensive cross-platform testing flexibility, and robust performance tracking.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify allows seamless integration with existing systems through intuitive deployment. Digital.ai Continuous Testing offers a strong cloud-based solution, with initial configuration challenges being mitigated by excellent customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Worksoft Certify appeals to budget-conscious companies with its lower setup cost and quicker returns. Digital.ai Continuous Testing, while requiring a higher initial investment, offers greater long-term ROI with its scalability and powerful capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Worksoft Certify

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (3rd)

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 1.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 3.1%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Worksoft Certify	3.1%
Digital.ai Continuous Testing	1.4%
Other	95.5%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mampi Bhattacharya

Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Continuous testing has accelerated daily releases and now provides faster, richer debugging insights

Digital.ai Continuous Testing could be better in certain areas, and I can share my experience-based view on what can be frustrating. One issue is device availability and queue delays during peak CI hours. Sometimes devices are busy, causing tests to queue and the pipeline to slow down unexpectedly, which is especially painful for large regression suites or tight release timelines. Improvements are needed in smarter auto-scaling of device pools and better priority-based scheduling. Additionally, execution speed variability occurs; the same test sometimes runs fast and sometimes slow, depending on device load and network latency, making results less predictable. More stable execution environments and better performance isolation per session would help. Furthermore, debugging can still be indirect; even with logs or videos, I do not fully control the device as I would with local debugging, making it hard to pause and inspect live states or reproduce edge-case issues locally. More interactive debugging and improved local reproduction tools are necessary. Cost versus usage efficiency is another area of concern, as device cloud usage can be expensive and we sometimes have idle or inefficient tests that waste money. Improvements in usage analytics and cost optimization suggestions for smart test selection to run only impacted tests are areas where I believe Digital.ai Continuous Testing could improve.

Read full review

Muddisetty Arun Kumar

WorkSoft Certified Automation Engineer at Qualesce

Automation has delivered strong ROI with AI-driven test prioritization and parallel reporting

The best feature of Worksoft Certify is the automatic report generation. Unlike traditional tools like Selenium or Java-based frameworks where reporting often requires custom coding, Certify handles this natively. We are currently utilizing the 14.5 version, which has modernized these capabilities, though we frequently manage backward compatibility for clients still running on the 12.x version series.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing, and they also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has positively impacted my organization with massive reductions in testing time, enabling us to cut our regression cycle from two to three days down to two to three hours, transition from weekly releases to nearly daily deployments, and reduce production defects by 30 to 50% while significantly improving debugging efficiency and overall team productivity."

"I have seen a clear positive ROI after implementing Digital.ai Continuous Testing, especially in terms of time saving, faster release cycle, and improved efficiency."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has had a pretty positive impact on the organization, especially in terms of speed and reliability."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has had a very positive impact in terms of efficiency and quality."

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."

"We have seen that the initial Worksoft implementation has helped our customers reduce their testing cycle time by 50 percent, and with further continuous improvement, we have seen cycle time reduced up to 75 percent, which is the level of productivity achieved using Worksoft Certify."

"The Capture 2.0 feature is good. Our clients like using it. It does not take long to create documentation."

"It is a fantastic tool."

"We have been able to increase our overall testing maturity and test automation coverage."

"It is a lot easier to maintain test scripts on Worksoft Certify than on other testing tools that we have had in the past."

"During our yearly upgrades, we have now gotten them down to ten days or less. We have Worksoft run all our integration tests, where it used to take probably six weeks to do that manually."

"Most important feature is the ability to automatically perform test without the need of a manual script, it's very fast and can perform overnight testing without human intervention (Lights-out testing)."

"The easy of use and ease of integration of Worksoft Certify are very good."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"Device availability and queue delays during peak CI hours are an issue; sometimes devices are busy, causing tests to queue and the pipeline to slow down unexpectedly, which is especially painful for large regression suites or tight release timelines."

"I believe that it could be more stable. During times when something is not working, it is difficult to find the solution."

"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."

"One challenge is that the initial setup and integration with CI/CD pipelines can sometimes be a bit complex, especially for teams new to automation."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could be improved to make the experience even better."

"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing is a solid tool, but there are a few things that can be frustrating at times."

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing cons

"In the past, when we've tried to automate some of our web apps, it has not been as robust. If there were one thing that could be improved, it's interaction with web applications. The issue we were running into is that it was harder to identify the objects than it is with some of the other architectured applications."

"Certify is integrated with Solution Manager, but this integration could be easier."

"The execution time which is happening with Worksoft Certify is a bit low compared to Playwright and all."

"The user interface isn’t the best."

"We can use it for the web application, but we are facing stability-related challenges. The properties are getting changed. For example, when I am performing any operation on the text box but the development team has done some changes, our Worksoft scripts are getting changed. This is the main challenge that we are facing while developing tests for the web application in Worksoft Certify, where any changes in the backend are indirectly impacting our scripts. For the web application, there is a scarcity of resources. Unlike an SAP application that doesn't require much experience, for the web application, you require experienced people."

"There have been some previous security concerns with the way that Capture has worked. When you turn it on, you don't know what it's capturing. This has raised some concerns in the past, especially in our European regions."

"With the codeless process automation across packaged applications, once in a while, if we get a weird application that's not widely used, it gets a little stickier. First, the software has to learn the fields, so you have to identify all the fields. Once you do that, as long as there isn’t any non-standard code in the application, then it works fine. But there's that one step that you have to do, a step you don't have to do with SAP and Salesforce, for example."

"Worksoft Certify needs a bit of improvement for its web-based processes. It can be difficult because you need to recall the maps, then you still have to add-on for your browser. When you are using the browser-based testing, you cannot even move your mouse or do anything on your system when you are using the web-based testing. Therefore, it needs a bit of improvement on that side. While it does work, it needs improvement. From the SAP side, there is nothing better than Worksoft Certify. However, from the web-based, we are moving towards Fiori. SAP will soon be totally web-based. For Fiori, they need to be great with SAP testing. Thus, Worksoft has to improve the web-based testing part for Certify."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."

"The initial investment is probably a little high. It was a little hard for me to sell, but it was a one-shot deal and that's why it's so high. All we are doing now is paying annual maintenance, which we don't have to do if we don't want upgrades, but we do."

"In general, they changed their license model. Before you had to buy licenses for each component, and now they changed it so you can buy a license and use it for nearly all their applications."

"We could use Certify to do robotic process automation, which is basically running a process on your correction system instead of your test system. Therefore, we may do that in the future."

"We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more."

"We have seen that the initial Worksoft implementation has helped our customers reduce their testing cycle time by 50 percent. With further continuous improvement, we have seen cycle time reduced up to 75 percent. That is the level of productivity achieved using Worksoft Certify."

"I can only judge based on the situation that we had around six years ago when we did the tool evaluation. Worksoft was not the cheapest, but it provided the value. For 25 concurrent licenses, we paid more than €400,000, so it was not cheap. In the end, if you see how much time you are saving and compare it with others, its price is okay. We had also compared its cost with the licensing costs for HP and Tricentis, and they were at another level. Now, as we have already booked the licenses, we only have to pay an annual maintenance fee, which is 70%, and that is okay."

"I don't have much idea about the pricing, but it is a licensed tool, and it is somewhat costly."

"The license cost is quite high. This might not be a consideration for a large company, but it will be for a small company. E.g., Tricentis (their competitor) offers certain exclusive use cases where a company can use it in a certain way, so this is another option that companies consider."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	71

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

Digital.ai Continuous Testing is a solid tool, but there are a few things that can be frustrating at times. One thing I noticed is that the initial setup and configuration can feel complex, especia...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The main use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing has been automating test execution as part of the CI/CD pipeline, especially for ensuring builds are stable before the release. For example, I us...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

Regarding the pricing of Worksoft Certify, I do not know the actual pricing, but the company gets it as a per-license, per-user basis. I do not know the inside information, but I got the feeling th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Worksoft Certify?

The execution time which is happening with Worksoft Certify is a bit low compared to Playwright and all. That is one thing I have found as a little discomfort. When compared, it is comparatively le...

See all answers

Comparisons

TestObject vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 9% of the time

Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 6% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 6% of the time

BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 4% of the time

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 19% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 12% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 6% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 5% of the time

Qualibrate vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

June 2026

Download Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

May 2026

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Also Known As

Experitest Seetest, Experitest

No data available

Overview

Digital.ai Continuous Testing offers automated testing with real device cloud access and CI/CD integration to efficiently manage web and mobile app testing, ensuring reliability and consistency.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing is designed to streamline testing by automating executions across multiple environments and devices, reducing manual efforts and speeding up feedback cycles. With features like cross-browser testing, and integration into CI/CD pipelines, it helps detect defects early and improve release quality. Users benefit from parallel and automated test executions for faster delivery and enhanced compatibility, leveraging Mobile Studio for versatile scripting. However, initial setup can be complex, and users note UI/UX improvements and issue navigation challenges. Despite these, it facilitates quality assurance through its comprehensive testing capabilities.

What are the key features of Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

Real Device Cloud Access: Provides extensive testing across different devices.
CI/CD Integration: Streamlines testing within development pipelines.
Automated Test Execution: Speeds up testing processes with parallel runs.
Cross-Browser Testing: Ensures compatibility and functionality across browsers.
Mobile Studio Scripting: Allows diverse scripting for mobile tests.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficiency Improvements: Significant reduction in manual testing efforts.
Time Savings: Faster feedback and early defect detection.
Reliability & Consistency: Better outcomes with multi-device testing.
Improved Release Quality: Higher delivery and compatibility standards.

Industries utilize Digital.ai Continuous Testing to automate and integrate testing within CI/CD pipelines for web and mobile applications, improving application quality by testing across varied devices and environments. It enhances release quality and delivery speed by verifying new features, detecting bugs early, and supporting accessibility testing. This facilitates rapid feedback by prioritizing critical tests and maintaining stability pre-release.

Digital.ai

Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.

Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.

What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?

Codeless Automation: Enables easy script creation without coding skills.
Capture Feature: Records actions for rapid test development.
SAP Integration: Ensures seamless operation within SAP environments.
Interface Support: Enhances versatility across multiple platforms.
End-to-End Testing: Facilitates comprehensive testing cycles.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces testing time.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Minimizes errors and enhances efficiency.
Supporting Transformations: Aids large-scale SAP and cloud transformations.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with stability and reliability.
Maintenance: Decoupled scripts ensure easy updates and management.

In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Worksoft Certify

June 2026

Free Report: Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.