The solution is used for workload automation.
Dollar Universe Workload Automation offers comprehensive management of enterprise workloads, enabling enhanced automation and management for seamless operations across systems and applications.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Dollar Universe Workload Automation | 1.7% |
| Control-M | 11.4% |
| AutoSys Workload Automation | 6.8% |
| Other | 80.1% |
This technology facilitates dynamic workload distribution, allowing businesses to intelligently manage complex environments. It ensures continual monitoring and optimization of task processing, minimizing delays and enhancing operational efficiency. Its robust capabilities aid organizations in achieving high performance and reliability, adapting to diverse and evolving requirements with ease.
What are the key features of Dollar Universe Workload Automation?In industries like banking, telecommunications, and retail, Dollar Universe Workload Automation is implemented to manage intricate networks of tasks, ensuring real-time data processing and compliance with regulatory protocols. It enhances strategic operational capacity, supporting future growth and complexity.
Dollar Universe Workload Automation was previously known as CA Automic Dollar Universe.
TCS Bancs, Gaumont, Bank Turkey
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Presales Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I use Dollar Universe Workload Automation for workload automation, valuing its stability and scalability. However, I prefer Automic due to its modern interface and integrations. Improvements are needed in Dollar Universe's interface and support for Kubernetes. |
| Exposition Engineer at Cgi Deutschland KG | 4.0 | I use Dollar Universe Workload Automation for workload automation due to budget constraints. One of its most valuable features is its ease of use. However, it needs stability improvements, especially when connecting to scripts or searching for functions. |
| Team Leader at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees | 2.0 | We find the solution stable, scalable, and well-priced for automation. However, unreliable features, data corruption, and poor support disappoint us. Its limited workflow capabilities mean we're seeking alternatives, rating it 4/10. |
The solution is used for workload automation.
The most valuable features of Dollar Universe Workload Automation are stability and scalability.
The interface of Dollar Universe Workload Automation could improve to something more modern. Additionally, Kubernetes is not an option to use in
I have been using Dollar Universe Workload Automation for approximately five years.
Dollar Universe Workload Automation is highly stable.
We have had no complaints about the scalability of Dollar Universe Workload Automation.
This solution is enterprise-grade. However, it can be used for SMBs.
We do not use support often because the solution is stable. There can be support for six years after purchase.
I have experience using both Automic Workload Automation and Dollar Universe Workload Automation, and I find Automic to be the more desirable option to offer to customers. This is due to its modern user interface, a wide selection of pre-built integrations, and substantial investments made in the platform. As a result, I would choose to prioritize promoting Automic Workload Automation for sale.
The initial setup of Dollar Universe Workload Automation is easy.
The price of Dollar Universe Workload Automation is comparable to other solutions on the market. There can be discounts available depending on the business.
The price of the solution is flexible.
As a new customer, you have the opportunity to explore the upcoming new versions of Dollar Universe Workload Automation which are set to bring about many changes and introduce exciting new features to make your life easier. However, if you are a new customer and starting from scratch, I would recommend choosing Automic instead. On the other hand, if you are an existing customer with valuable skills and knowledge of Dollar Universe, and you are content with the current features and functionalities, then it may be more beneficial for you to stick with a higher version of Dollar Universe Workload Automation.
I rate Dollar Universe Workload Automation an eight out of ten.
The solution is used for workload automation.
The solution is easy to use and is one of its most valuable features.
The solution needs stability improvement when connecting to the script or trying to find something. It takes a few seconds to perform the function or needs a complete reorganization.
The solution could be more stable. Sometimes, the client's system stopped working or could no longer process the solution, and it had to be reorganized from the start.
I rate its stability a five out of ten.
It is a scalable solution. Presently, 20 end-users are using the solution.
I rate its scalability a nine out of ten.
The technical support is good, but there is a long waiting time until they respond.
I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.
The initial setup was straightforward. I rate the setup process an eight out of ten. It took a day to deploy the solution.
Two people from a vendor team helped with the implementation of the solution.
The solution is easy to use. One can understand the application in a few weeks. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
We primarily use the solution for automation within our organization.
It's quite stable.
Some of the automation options are quite good.
The scalability is very good.
The pricing is great.
We have found the architecture and the features in the architecture to be quite good.
There are some features that don't work as expected.
For example, the schedule doesn't start at the time that was specified.
Sometimes files can get corrupt, which can be quite dangerous. That's one of our main concerns at the moment.
Technical support is unhelpful.
The redundancies are lacking.
We expected to have workflows that could meet our business requirements. Certain things like automatic lookup on the systems and seeing objects would have been great. The board reporting tool needs to be improved a lot. We have a lot of issues with the product and its workflow capabilities.
I've used the solution for nine years. It's been a while. We've almost used it for a decade.
The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It's pretty reliable and the performance is good.
It's a scalable solution. If we need to expand it, we can. That's my understanding.
Around 15 people have used the solution in our company.
Technical support is not so good for this product. We are not satisfied with the help we get offered.
The pricing is okay. At the moment, we are satisfied with the cost.
We are currently looking for other options right now as this solution doesn't work as we expected.
We're just an end-user and a customer.
I'd rate the solution at a four out of ten. In many ways, we've been disappointed with its capabilities. There are other options on the market that may be better.