We use the solution for managing large programs, customer interactions, testing, and calculation purposes of our finance-based company.
Eclipse MicroProfile is an innovative framework tailored for optimizing enterprise Java applications through microservices. It enhances developer productivity by offering standardized APIs that streamline the creation and maintenance of cloud-native applications.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Eclipse MicroProfile | 7.4% |
| Spring Boot | 28.0% |
| Jakarta EE | 16.9% |
| Other | 47.7% |
Designed to meet the demands of modern software architectures, Eclipse MicroProfile provides a comprehensive set of specifications for building scalable and high-performance microservices. It reduces complexity by extending and refining existing Java EE APIs, fostering seamless integration with enterprise solutions. By focusing on areas like configuration, fault tolerance, and security, it ensures robust application performance and operational reliability, making it indispensable for developers in the microservices domain.
What are the key features of Eclipse MicroProfile?In diverse industries, Eclipse MicroProfile is leveraged extensively for developing cloud-native applications in finance, healthcare, and e-commerce. Financial institutions use it to ensure secure transactions and scalability. Healthcare systems benefit from its robust data integration capability. E-commerce platforms enhance user engagement and transaction reliability, positioning Eclipse MicroProfile as a highly adaptable choice for tech-driven enterprises.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Integration Developer at FHI 360 | 4.0 | We use Eclipse MicroProfile to manage programs in our finance company. Its support for dynamic developer profiles is valuable, though speed and online publishing need improvement. The solution's scalability and ease of use make it preferable over others. |
| Partner at SouJava | 4.5 | I use Eclipse MicroProfile to create microservices. While I find it valuable, the tool's messaging needs improvement. I have not considered other solutions or specific cloud providers and have no data on return on investment. |
| Chief Architect at NEUSOFT JAPAN | 4.0 | I've used this solution for a month. It offers a lightweight runtime, which I like, but Kubernetes microserver deployment is challenging. I'm still learning but prefer it to alternatives, rating it 8/10. |

We use the solution for managing large programs, customer interactions, testing, and calculation purposes of our finance-based company.
The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to support dynamic developer profiles. We can easily create multiple accounts and rooms for different developers for application usage. Its features help our teams dynamically match project activities.
The solution's performance speed could be better while working on the browser. Also, they should include an option for online publishing. It will make sharing work easier. We can just publish work online and share a link with other members.
We have been using the solution for 13 years.
The solution is stable.
We have 352 solution users in our organization.
The solution's technical support team is responsive.
The solution's initial setup process is easy and fast. We have to register and subscribe to it via email, create an account, and start working. Although, sometimes, it gets logged out when we load the application.
We prefer the solution over other vendors for its scalability and ease of use. It helps us handle the process of transactional programming business easily.
I recommend the solution to others and rate it an eight out of ten.

We use the solution to create microservices.
The tool needs to improve its messaging.
I don't have much more data or experience with stability.
The solution is scalable.
The tool's setup is easy.
I would rate the product a nine out of ten. It is very important to know Java, and issues about distributed computing and monitoring.
We integrate this software for our customers.
A great feature is the lightweight runtime.
The most difficult part is deployment of the microservers in the Kubernetes environment and building the mechanisms for automated testing.
I've been using this solution for a month.
The solution is stable.
The solution is scalable.
We're currently also using Spring Boot and need to decide whether we'll go with that or with MicroProfile. We don't yet have sufficient familiarity with MicroProfile but I prefer using it.
Installation of our current project will probably take a couple of months because the customer has a three-layer environment. The deployment is carried out in conjunction with the customer's IT department and our team. Some of our customers have 100 users and others have 1,000. We have a maintenance contract with our customers.
This is currently an open-source solution.
We're not yet familiar with MicroProfile, so I can't recommend it although I like using it. Given my experience to date, I rate this product eight out of 10.