The HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) excels in managing scalable cloud ecosystems with key products like HCP Consul for seamless service networking, HCP Vault for robust secrets management, HCP Packer for automating image creation, and HCP Terraform for efficient infrastructure management. Notable for enhancing organizational productivity, HCP integrates well across clouds, supporting security and operational efficiency while simplifying workflows and boosting collaboration.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) | 8.3% |
| HPE GreenLake | 19.7% |
| Everpure Evergreen One | 18.5% |
| Other | 53.5% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Managed Cloud Services | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) vs CDW Managed Cloud Services | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) vs Kubernetes Everywhere | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) vs HPE GreenLake | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CloudCheckr | 3.9 | 8.6% | 81% | 12 interviewsAdd to research |
| Everpure Evergreen One | 4.7 | 18.5% | 100% | 14 interviewsAdd to research |
For HCP Consul, the secure service networking capabilities, enabling reliable service-to-service communication with robust security protocols, is highly appreciated. The simplicity and automation of networking tasks across clouds are also noted as significant advantages.
For HCP Vault, users praise its secrets management that securely stores, accesses, and manages sensitive data across systems. The advanced identity-based access and comprehensive data protection features are underscored for enabling stringent security measures effectively.
The scalability and interoperability of HCP across different cloud environments are consistently valued, allowing businesses to maintain agility and operational efficiency.
Pricing transparency and overall cost management are mentioned as areas that need better clarity and more flexible options to cater to different scales of enterprise needs.
The platform's interface and user experience could be more intuitive, as some users find it challenging to navigate and manage resources efficiently. There is a call for broader integration capabilities, particularly with other tools and platforms not currently supported, which limits operational flexibility.
Users suggest that customer support responsiveness and the provision of more detailed documentation would significantly improve problem resolution times and user autonomy in troubleshooting.
Many users have noticed a positive return on investment. They highlight the platform's efficiency in managing infrastructure, which notably reduces the time and effort required for configuration and maintenance. Some commented on the cost-effectiveness of scaling operations compared to other solutions, citing the ease of implementation and comprehensive management features that allow their teams to focus on development rather than system upkeep.
Additionally, users appreciate the robust security features, which add significant value by safeguarding their systems while minimizing the need for extensive security management resources.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform's pricing structure is competitive and flexible, which appeals to a variety of business sizes. Considering the platform's features and capabilities, the setup costs are often highlighted as reasonable.
However, some users mentioned a complexity in understanding the full scope of licensing models, suggesting a need for clearer explanation or transparency about what different licenses offer and cost in the long term.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform primarily serves distinct purposes across its range of offered products.
For HCP Consul, users frequently leverage it to manage service networking, enabling seamless service discovery and mesh across multiple cloud environments.
HCP Vault is commonly used for securing, storing, and tightly controlling access to tokens, passwords, certificates, and encryption keys.
HCP Packer is often chosen for its ability to automate the creation of machine and container images for cloud platforms, thoughtfully easing the deployment process.
HCP Terraform is popular for its infrastructure as code capabilities, which facilitates efficient provisioning and management of infrastructure with codified templates.
Customers appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Users also find that the assistance offered is knowledgeable and efficient in resolving issues. Several comments highlight a relatively easy and informative interaction experience with the support personnel, contributing positively to user satisfaction.
The initial setup of HashiCorp Cloud Platform is straightforward and easy, with users particularly appreciating its clean and intuitive user interface that supports seamless navigation and management of cloud resources.
Users highlight its efficient integration capabilities with various public clouds like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, making it an adaptable choice for multi-cloud environments. However, some users suggest that the documentation could be enhanced to better assist during the initial configuration and troubleshooting stages.
Users appreciate the solution's ability to efficiently handle increasing workloads and its flexibility in scaling resources up or down according to demand.
Many appreciate the platform's cloud-agnostic approach, which allows for scaling across different cloud environments. Challenges noted include a learning curve in initially setting up and optimizing the scalability features.
Users regard the stability of the HashiCorp Cloud Platform as solid and reliable. They are impressed with the consistent performance and minimal downtime.
The platform's robust architecture, combined with effective management and monitoring tools, contributes positively to its overall stability, providing a trustworthy environment for managing infrastructure.
There are occasional mentions of issues during updates or integration with other services; however, these are not frequent and are typically resolved efficiently.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 44 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| operations Manager at a university with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I switched to HashiCorp Cloud Platform from Azure for its excellent service and ticketing. I appreciate its usability, observability, and transparency, which provide a unified view and faster problem resolution. This has significantly saved our team time. |
| SR. systems specialists at ASB Bank Ltd | 5.0 | I use HashiCorp Cloud Platform, primarily Vault, for secure credential management in DevOps, finding it easy to integrate with a low learning curve. Its HCL language, stability, and scalability have led to significant cost and time savings, making it a highly recommended solution. |
| Director, Information Technology Audit at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I primarily use HCP for data tokenization and managing user access, finding its organization and permission structure highly valuable for saving time. While I suggest speeding up the process, it's a stable solution, and I rate it 8/10. |
| Database Administrator at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees | 3.5 | I use HashiCorp Cloud Platform as a password vault for privileged accounts, finding its vaults and access easy. It improved our workflow and SOX compliance, saving time. I wish for better audit logging, but it's stable and scalable. I rate it 7/10. |
| DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I find HashiCorp Cloud Platform Terraform excellent for consistent Azure infrastructure deployment, praising its user-friendliness and scalability. However, I am concerned about module updates deleting existing infrastructure and the need for improved documentation for new users. |
| Site Reliability Engineer - Optus AU and Singtel Optus Pty Limited at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I deploy multi-cloud infrastructure with HCP, finding its IaC and shared configurations crucial for collaboration and reducing errors, improving our SLA. It's stable and scalable. My main request is for internal machine configuration. |
| Account technical leader at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use HCP for automated infrastructure provisioning with Terraform, finding its simple automation boosts my organization's efficiency and productivity. I've seen ROI in time saved and recommend trying it, rating it an 8. |
| DevSecOps Engineer at Hamilton Capital Holding | 3.5 | I use HashiCorp Terraform Cloud for deploying infrastructures in my company and appreciate its ability to automate and create reusable modules. However, there is room for improvement with some bug fixes needed. Other solutions were not considered. |
| Global BD & Partner Alliance at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | I appreciate HashiCorp Cloud Platform for its excellent documentation and supportive community, making it easy to find answers. The platform's adaptability and simple update management enable me to handle multiple cloud environments from one device efficiently. |
| Cloud Associate Dev Ops at a computer software company with 201-500 employees | 4.0 | We primarily use HashiCorp Cloud Platform for infrastructure as code (IaC) and secure backend storage. Its IaC feature greatly reduces manual errors and increases efficiency. While it's enterprise-focused, open-source access could benefit students. It's worth the investment. |
My main use case for HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is that we've been using Azure, and we recently switched to HashiCorp because of the service and ease of ticketing systems.
A specific example of how I'm using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) in my day-to-day work is that we usually handle computers, so we are able to visualize it with the dashboards on the cloud.
The best features HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) offers are probably the ease of usability, the observability, and the transparency.
When I mention observability and transparency, those features help me in my work by keeping everything in my view; I don't need to juggle between different platforms, as everything serves as a one unified solution. About transparency, things are crystal clear and laid out openly, making it much easier for consumers like us who manage tons of devices all in one unified platform.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) has positively impacted my organization by making the whole problem-solving process easier, as if there are any ticket issues, things get resolved more easily compared to our previous services.
Issues get resolved much more quickly now, with most of these solutions being almost readily available, and if escalated to a support team, we get a quicker response time, as opposed to the previous solution which involved a lot of back and forth and consumed a lot more time.
I am not entirely sure about how HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) could improve, as I don't have anything on top of my head at the moment.
I have been using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) for the last six months.
I have not encountered any updates or upgrades with HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) yet because we are pretty new users.
Issues get resolved much more quickly now, with most of these solutions being almost readily available, and if escalated to a support team, we get a quicker response time, as opposed to the previous solution which involved a lot of back and forth and consumed a lot more time.
I did not previously use a different solution, so I cannot speak to that.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is deployed in my organization using a hybrid cloud setup.
We use AWS cloud services with our hybrid cloud setup.
The learning curve when I first started using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) has been drastically rewarding, as the team was kind enough to help us lay out the foundation and map through how to proceed with the transition.
I cannot talk about money, but I can certainly mention that we have saved time because the simplification of the UI and the easier ticketing system makes it easier.
I was not part of the team that handled the pricing, setup cost, and licensing, so I don't handle that.
We did not evaluate other options before choosing HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
I manage user roles and permissions within HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) by finding it straightforward, as it is laid out easily for people to adapt.
I monitor the health or performance of our resources within HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP), but I am not aware of a specific dashboard or tool that I rely on, as I do not personally take care of the health monitoring tool for HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) integrates with other tools or platforms we use in our organization by having most of our tools as in-house tools which we just integrate on top of the layer of what we use.
I would rate this review a 9.
My main use case for HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is that we used HashiCorp Consul and HashiCorp Vault. HashiCorp Vault helped us save our secured passwords for our DevOps platform, and we integrated it with our Puppet, which is a configuration management system, as well as our Linux system. All the passwords we secured using HashiCorp Vault, and also for the console, HashiCorp Consul, to integrate with our team channel platform.
A specific example of how I use HashiCorp Vault in my DevOps workflow is that we use it to template our credentials. In the pipeline, we have the templated flow, and in the continuous integration and deployment, HashiCorp Vault is used as a tool to retrieve the password. HashiCorp Consul serves as a front-end user case for our Slack team channel.
Regarding my main use case or other ways I have used HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP), I believe this covers the main one or two things. While working in the bank two years back, I brought HashiCorp products for the same use, and I also used HashiCorp products when I worked for another organization called Focus, which is a telecom company. I believe HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) could be useful for any organization with a DevOps environment, and HashiCorp Vault could be one of the secured ways to save your credentials.
The best features that HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) offers include its HashiCorp language, which is very easy to use, and you can do whatever the organization requires. For DevOps integration, HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is very easy to integrate, and I found the learning curve not hard at all. There is a lot of online documentation and learning materials available, making it quite helpful. Additionally, HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) has two versions: one is professional, and another one is a free version online that you can use as open-source. There are also plenty of documentation and online forums where you can chat with specialists in HashiCorp products.
HashiCorp HCL language makes things easier for my team because it is very straightforward and any programmer can understand it. The syntax is easy, and there is a lot of documentation as well as learning materials available online that can be very useful.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) has positively impacted my organization, leading to a significant budget saving and allowing us to integrate everything the way we wanted. Those positive impacts include a definite plus in terms of security and easier integration. Regarding cost savings, it was a big win for us as the organization has saved a lot. We did not need to have another third-party product, which is often expensive in the market, and the templating of any credentials and passwords was easy to manage in one place.
I am not a specialized HashiCorp engineer, so I cannot make any comments on how HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) can be improved. From a user perspective, I think all aspects are covered in HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP). The user interface is very good, support resources are available, and all documentation is really handy, so I do not see any improvements required.
I have been using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) for the last five to seven years.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is very stable.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is really scalable.
Customer support was great.
Neutral
Previously, we used KeePass as our solution to save credentials, which was merely an application where we mounted the database on our shared drive. It was not a secure way to save the credentials, hence the transition.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that it was easy. The pricing and setup were easy because it was very straightforward to understand.
We have seen a return on investment, specifically regarding money saved. Although I cannot comment on how much money was saved since I was not involved in the financial decisions, in terms of time, we saved a lot. Typically, the implementation time for other projects could stretch to six months, but we achieved everything within three months, marking a significant three-month savings in deploying a new big project.
I would highly recommend HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP). The vendor can contact me if they have any questions or comments about my review. I found this interview really good, and I do not think any changes are needed for the future. I gave this review a rating of ten.
My main use case for HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is tokenization and auditing.
I use HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) to ensure that the data is tokenized and the access authentication and authorization is managed through HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) to ensure that the right people have the right access to it.
There are no other ways I'm using it or benefits I've noticed beyond what I've mentioned.
The best feature HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) offers, in my experience, is organization.
When I mention organization as a top feature of HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP), I mean the role and permission structure.
Permissions are my main feature of interest regarding the capabilities of HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) and any other features such as automation, integration, or security.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) has positively impacted my organization by ensuring that the data is tokenized and the user access is appropriately assigned.
I don't have enough experience with HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) yet to have any recommendations for improvement at this time, but I would suggest speeding up the process.
I have been using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) for a couple of years.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is stable.
I did not notice any difference in HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) regarding scalability, and I didn't notice any downtime.
I've not interacted with the customer support team for HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
I have not used any other solution prior to HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
I'm not sure if I purchased HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) through the AWS Marketplace, as this is a business decision and I'm just auditing against it.
It's too early to tell if I've seen a return on investment.
I have no experience in pricing, setup cost, or licensing with HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
I did not evaluate other options before choosing HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
For my team, that process has no challenge as it's a quick way to identify the access control, making it a good win.
I have seen specific outcomes such as time saved managing permission and also a reduction in the management of access.
If you need to protect data, HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) should be a solution to look at.
I would rate this product an 8 overall.
My main use case for HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is that it serves as a password vault for privileged accounts. I use HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) mainly for privileged account management, utilizing HashiCorp Vaults to give appropriate users access to perform administrative functions.
We decide which users get access based on their roles, essentially on their job titles and the teams they work on. They are typically performing a lot of database administration work with HashiCorp Vault.
The best features HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) offers are the vaults and the ease of accessing the passwords within the vaults; I believe that is probably the most useful.
The ease of accessing passwords and using Vault has positively impacted my team's workflow and productivity, as it changes the way my team handles sensitive credentials. Due to data security audits that we have performed, this is a much more SOX compliant and regulation compliant method of managing passwords.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) has helped with SOX compliance and audits by providing a more secure way for auditors to track whether passwords are in line with company policy and properly protected, mainly as a result of security audits. This has led to measurable outcomes including reduced audit times.
I think HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) can be improved by creating a module for audit to make access to logs easier and to improve the auditability of who is accessing which vaults at which time and being able to generate that information in a report.
I have been using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) for a year.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is stable.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP)'s scalability is very good; it has been very easy to scale.
The customer support has been good so far; I have no complaints.
Positive
Before HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP), I was using a manual process of sharing passwords.
I have seen a return on investment, specifically time saved. I do not have an estimate of how much time my team has saved since implementing HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP); those metrics are not available to me.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very positive.
I did not evaluate any other options before choosing HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
My advice for others looking into HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is to examine your use cases for it and be sure to make any comparisons to other relevant, comparable products. My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. I would rate this product a seven out of ten.
My main use case for HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is to deploy infrastructure. We are a managed cloud, and we use HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) to deploy GCP infrastructure, AWS infrastructure, or Azure infrastructure. We also have some workloads for colocation, and in the past, I used HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) to manage VMware.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is used and complemented for doing internal provisioning with Ansible. HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is not very useful for configuring inside the machines, but for the infrastructure, it is an amazing tool.
The best features HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) offers are Infrastructure as Code, and it keeps everything in one place and shares all the configurations in the cloud. We can share configurations with the teams that can review and deploy from everywhere in the world.
Sharing configurations with my team has helped our workflow and collaboration because we are managing a big infrastructure of 2,500 machines. This is not a task for a single person, so we need to share the configuration with different teams. There are some teams that are very specialized; for example, security can manage HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) only for the security part, and infrastructure and storage manage their relative parts. This allows us to have segregation in the configuration and deployment of the infrastructure.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) has positively impacted my organization by helping us reduce the number of mistakes made in the infrastructure, and we can keep all the standards. We can show to the auditors how we manage the infrastructure, and we can get and manage all the recommendations and keep track of the recommendation and implementation of all the recommendations for the auditors.
If HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) could implement a way to configure the machines internally, and not only the cloud infrastructure provisioning and the boxes, and if they also added a way that we can easily configure the package or deploy applications inside the boxes, it would be fantastic. At the moment, I require another product to do this configuration.
I have been using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) for the last seven years while working with HashiCorp and Terraform, either in the cloud or private deployment.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is stable in my experience. I have not had any issues with the downtime. It was available during business hours and when I required it, and I never experienced an outage in the platform.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) scalability is good and it worked very well and performed exactly as expected. Sometimes the scripts take a long time to execute, but this is the way that we write the scripts and it is not related to HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
Before HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP), I basically used deployment by hand. We started doing automation seriously with HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP). Previously, we had some bash scripts to do configuration and deployment, but it was not a serious way to do it.
I have not seen a return on investment with HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP), so I am unable to provide these metrics. This is more related to finance. I am basically a user, and I am not aware of the budget or the billing for AWS or HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that because we are using AWS Marketplace now, we can put this in the budget, and we have better control over the pricing of HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
Before choosing HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP), we evaluated Chef and also looked at different products, but we chose HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) because it was the standard for the market.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) helps me manage different environments by making things easy because we can track all the changes in the infrastructure. Initially, the deployment takes more time than doing it by hand, but in the long run, it is better to have HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) so we can track changes over time and detect fixes early.
Our SLA was improved when using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP). We have reports over the past year showing that we can reduce the number of incidents using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is perfect because the product and the interface are simple, and I want to keep it that way. More complexity would be confusing, and I notice that when the product tries to add more characteristics, it makes it difficult to manage. At the moment, HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is perfect because it is simple, and we can find every command in one place and interface. The shared configuration is fantastic.
My advice to others looking into using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is that it is the standard, and it is easy to find employees who are able to manage HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) without more training. If you get HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP), you can start immediately. It is a very easy product, and the language is very easy to learn. You can go from test to production very easily and fast using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) scripts and deploy infrastructure as code very easily. I would rate HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) a seven out of ten.
My main use case for HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is infrastructure provisioning. I use HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) for infrastructure provisioning by using Terraform to automate the process.
The best feature HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) offers is automation. The automation feature stands out for me because it is easy to use and simple.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) has positively impacted my organization by bringing efficiency and increasing productivity. It has brought efficiency and increased productivity by simplifying the team workload and improving time.
I don't know how HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) can be improved.
I have been using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) for six months.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is stable in my experience.
I am not sure about the scalability of HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
I did not need to use customer support.
I did not previously use a different solution before HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP).
I was not involved with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing.
I have seen a return on investment with HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP), primarily in time saved.
Before choosing HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP), I did not evaluate other options.
My advice to others looking into using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) is to try it. I would rate this review an 8.
I use HashiCorp Terraform Cloud for Packer. I use the solution in my company to deploy infrastructures.
When I started using Terraform, it was an open-source tool to automate the infrastructure with which you can try to utilize it and make it a reusable module, making everything easy for regular work.
From an improvement perspective, there is a need to ensure some bug fixes.
I have been using HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) for two years. I am a user of the solution.
I am not working with any company. I am doing some open-source projects and trying to build with open-source tools, how we can implement it in our future architectures, and how we can implement it in our different companies and different scenarios.
The product's initial setup phase is easy.
The solution is deployed on clouds, like GCP and AWS.
The tool's cost depends on how someone is trying to use it. For my side, the tool is not expensive. It is a very flexible product that you can utilize. I think the tool is a little bit expensive for smaller companies, especially startups. MNCs can get the tool at a reduce price.
I recommend the tool to others since it is a lovely product.
The tool is easy for a beginner to learn to use.
I rate Terraform ten out of ten, while Packer is an eight out of ten. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
The tool's documentation is excellent. It's well-organized, easy to use, simple, and easily readable. I can usually find answers to my questions quickly in the docs.
The community support is also great. When I have queries, I can post them on public forums like Reddit or Twitter and get helpful responses. The community is active and supportive.
I find the HCP's adaptability. The update management is simple to use. I can create different environments, usernames, and accounts for multiple cloud setups but manage everything from a single device.
I have been using the product for one year and two months.
I encountered a few bugs that I reported on GitHub, but they were fixed within about a month.
Specifically, I found a bug related to a hybrid cloud solution. It wasn't exactly a bug but more of a small reconciliation issue. I discovered that other users on Reddit had experienced the same issue.
Regarding stability, I would rate HCP as eight point five out of ten.
The main challenge, besides the minor bugs, is the learning curve. It's simply a matter of getting familiar with the tools. Once you get good hands-on practice, it's easy to use for anyone.
The solution's scalability is good. I rate it a nine out of ten. My company has 200 users.
I haven't contacted technical support yet.
HCP's deployment is easy.
I use HashiCorp products daily as a cloud and DevOps engineer. I mainly use Terraform for infrastructure as code to manage cloud infrastructure on AWS, Azure, and GCP. It works well for multi-cloud and hybrid setups. I also use Vault to store secrets like passwords and database credentials. Additionally, I've used Packer to customize infrastructure and systems.
You need knowledge and experience to use Terraform, Vault, and other HashiCorp tools. You at least need basic information about what cloud is, how cloud works, what on-prem is, and what hybrid cloud is. If you consider AWS Cloud Architecting as a certificate holder, it would be a good opportunity to start with Terraform or Vault processes.
I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.
We use the solution mainly for infrastructure as code (IaC) and to securely store a backend file. We can also use it to provide role-based access to users, whereby they can only access certain resources with a certain access limit. The solution is more secure than other storage platforms like GitLab or Bitbucket.
The solution's most valuable feature is infrastructure as code (IaC). When you want to create any resource over the cloud, it usually takes a lot of time and sometimes results in manual errors. There'll be an error whenever we perform something manually over a console.
When I use Terraform instead of using a console to create the same infrastructure, it will simplify my work. I can use the same script repeatedly to create multiple resources of the same kind, which makes my work simpler.
HashiCorp Cloud Platform is an enterprise solution. It would be good if college or university students could explore HashiCorp Cloud Platform to a certain extent as an open-source solution. This would enable them to work on it directly when they come to the industry rather than needing a knowledge transfer.
I've been using the solution for a couple of years. I work in a service-based industry where my clients completely rely on HashiCorp Cloud Platform.
I haven't encountered any issues with the solution's stability. However, when I host it on a server with multiple users, I may encounter some latency issues.
I rate the solution’s stability eight and a half out of ten.
The solution provides seamless scalability. The solution works seamlessly when multiple users use the same script to practice scripting and versioning.
The solution is worth the money.
The solution's pricing is moderate according to industry standard prices.
The solution's integration capabilities are seamless. I can use it to efficiently store the state file in Google bucket and AWS bucket.
Anyone can use the solution. However, you need some experience to follow best practices and use it efficiently and securely. You also need experience to keep the modules in a separate file and securely store the values and variables in a separate file.
Initially, when I started learning the solution, I faced some challenges. Suppose a client previously used the solution, and the cloud had some feature limitations. If the client wants to enhance their resources, I need to update the modules to the recent version and make changes accordingly to the variable files or modules, which is pretty time-consuming.
I would mainly recommend the solution for startups with fewer employees. It allows them to reuse the code and provides good utility. They can directly get into the workflow instead of spending lots of time on the landing zone setup or initial intra-creation.
Overall, I rate the solution eight and a half out of ten.
