Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Safer Payments Logo

IBM Safer Payments Reviews

Vendor: IBM
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

What is IBM Safer Payments?

Adapt faster to changing threats and new products by dramatically shrinking the time it takes to test and deploy new profiles, rules, and models. Using a unique cognitive computing approach, IBM Safer Payments profiles the behavior of any entity and delivers best-fit analytics interactively to fraud professionals. This proven technology is already protecting some of the world's largest and most complex payment portfolios. Outthink fraud by rethinking detection.

Get the Fraud Detection and Prevention Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix, FICO Falcon Platform and more!
IBM Safer Payments is the #4 ranked solution in Fraud Detection and Prevention software. PeerSpot users give IBM Safer Payments an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. IBM Safer Payments is most commonly compared to ThreatMetrix: IBM Safer Payments vs ThreatMetrix. IBM Safer Payments is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 63% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 46% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
July 2025
Get the category report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

IBM Safer Payments mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of IBM Safer Payments in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category stands at 3.2%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Safer Payments3.2%
ThreatMetrix11.7%
FICO Falcon Platform8.0%
Other77.1%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

  • "This feature has influenced my decision-making processes because IBM is a big player in this market, and we were looking for someone who could handle the number of transactions that we have, support us, and also had a local presence in the market."
  • "It's a very fast solution. It can make decisions in 10, 20 or 30 milliseconds. Another feature is that it's a white-box solution. Our clients can see the system's operation, including the rules influencing each decision. Additionally, it's an omnichannel solution capable of utilizing information from various digital channels such as card processing, mobile banking, web banking, APMs, and others."

Room for Improvement

  • "My experience with the initial setup of IBM Safer Payments was complex. It was complex because without pre-built-in templates, you need to build integration with different systems."
  • "The tool should enhance its reporting interface by adding more graphical elements like charts, diagrams, etc. Customers now want more vibrant visuals—bright charts with larger tables, perhaps incorporating animations and 3D elements. Sometimes, it's challenging to explain to customers why the current solution, while good, lacks these kinds of visuals."

Pricing

  • "I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Fraud Detection and Prevention Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
46%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Media Company
5%
Wholesaler/Distributor
4%
University
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Government
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Construction Company
1%

Compare IBM Safer Payments with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about IBM Safer Payments

IBM Safer Payments customers

Borgun

Related questions

  • 27
When evaluating Fraud Detection, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 64
What tool do you recommend using for Fraud Detection?
  • 829
What is Cognitive Cybersecurity and what is it used for?
  • 9
How can a business be best prepared to deal with online fraud?
  • 5
Why is Fraud Detection and Prevention important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Fraud Detection and Prevention

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
ThreatMetrix vs IBM Safer Payments Logo
ThreatMetrix vs IBM Safer Payments
FICO Falcon Platform vs IBM Safer Payments Logo
FICO Falcon Platform vs IBM Safer Payments
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management vs IBM Safer Payments Logo
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management vs IBM Safer Payments
SAS Fraud Management vs IBM Safer Payments Logo
SAS Fraud Management vs IBM Safer Payments
Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub vs IBM Safer Payments Logo
Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub vs IBM Safer Payments
IBM Trusteer vs IBM Safer Payments Logo
IBM Trusteer vs IBM Safer Payments
iovation FraudForce vs IBM Safer Payments Logo
iovation FraudForce vs IBM Safer Payments
IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) vs IBM Safer Payments Logo
IBM Financial Crimes Insights (FCI) vs IBM Safer Payments
Fraud Hunting Platform vs IBM Safer Payments Logo
Fraud Hunting Platform vs IBM Safer Payments
See all alternatives
 
IBM Safer Payments Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Business Technology Services at Habib Bank Ltd.4.0I use IBM Safer Payments for near real-time fraud monitoring. The "what if" scenarios and transaction scoring are valuable, though improvements are needed in integration. Comprehensive reporting aids strategy, but ROI is yet unrealized due to its regulatory purpose.
Director at Solidity4.0I use IBM Safer Payments to verify the accuracy of financial transactions, enhancing security and reducing fraud. Its fast, transparent, and easily implemented system supports various payment channels and integrates machine learning, although its reporting interface needs better graphical elements.