We primarily use the solution as an all-in-one tool.
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The flexibility to connect to third-party applications is fantastic.
We like the fact that there's the flexibility to use mobile devices and you can access it from any device.
There's good automation that can help you add comments or approve items.
The service is incredible. If you have a problem in general you have the answers in less than two hours typically. Regularly, you have everything resolved in less than four hours. The technical support has been great.
The stability is excellent.
The initial setup and configuration are straightforward and relatively simple.
What needs improvement?
The pricing could be lower.
They need to continue improving the interface with the third-party options. There is room for improvement in the interfaces with applications. They should be able to integrate a lot better with a lot of these options.
The reporting side can be better. Even though is very good and there are thousands of graphics that you can use, you'd like to do impactful presentations and they need to provide more visualizations.
The solution needs better integration and more direct integration with Jira.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a very mature application. I used the application for nearly eight years and the application improved from one version to the next with high stability.
Therefore, the stability is really fantastic. We are using the cloud now and the cloud is very safe. There are no firewall problems. In general, there are no network problems.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have 250 people using the solution.
How are customer service and technical support?
The support is even better than the tool. It's incredible. The technical support that they have wonderful. Not only do they have the speed and the support, the quality of the people for support are really great. They hire and train people who know the entire system and they can guide you through issues to fix the problem and really they take care of you. You are their number one customer - or, at least they make you feel that way.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used in another customer ALM from Micro Focus, however, I really prefer SpiraTeam.
The stability and the facilities that you obtain with this product are practically the same, however, the difference is when you give a ticket to Micro Focus you will likely obtain the answer in one week, which is not so fast. With Inflectra, you get answers the next day or sooner.
How was the initial setup?
The solution has a software as a service set up and it is done primarily by the company, by Inflectra directly in the cloud.
The configuration of the projects is very simple.
What about the implementation team?
All the installation itself is done by Inflectra directly because it's SaaS and the rest is done by us.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is designed as a Software as a Service, a SaaS.
We don't pay for anything beyond the standard fees. You don't have extras to pay for.
What other advice do I have?
I am the end user. I have a contract to provide testing for customers, however, ultimately the owner of the tool is the customer. For this reason, we're not direct customers.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. I don't like to put 10 due to the fact that I'm sure that something can be improved. That said, if the customer gave me the option to select a product, I'd select SpiraTeam over other tools. The facilities of the tool are more or less the same as the facilities of the ALM or other tools that are in the market. However, the customer support from Inflectra makes you feel like they are working with you. That is the gap in the quality that other options lack. They fix any issue very quickly.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
