We use this solution for the Ministry of Defense and the special agencies.
Easy to use, stable, and easy to install
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
It adds value to our existing platform, and therefore our system becomes more important for the customer.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the ease of use and the full reach of services.
It's pretty decent, and I don't see anything that needs to be improved.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see it integrate with third-party systems.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using IronNet IronDefense for a couple of years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is definitely stable as a system.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability has not yet been researched. It is not something that is growing. There no additional licenses to be added.
We have approximately 600 users in our organization.
We have more customers to be registered, and it is still a solution that we will be using.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer support and technical support should always be easier.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not use another solution previously. We are local and loyal to our vendors.
It is not easy to switch vendors within the mission-critical systems we are installing.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing could always be lower.
Licensing costs are yearly.
What other advice do I have?
Definitely, I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.
I would rate IronNet IronDefense a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
