LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).
**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.
**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).
**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| LambdaTest | 5.7% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 18.9% |
| BrowserStack | 10.7% |
| Other | 64.7% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Functional Testing Tools | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | LambdaTest vs Tricentis Tosca | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | LambdaTest vs OpenText Functional Testing | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | LambdaTest vs UiPath Test Cloud | Aug 29, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | 18.9% | 96% | 112 interviewsAdd to research |
| Katalon Studio | 3.9 | N/A | 89% | 47 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 122 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 97 |
| Large Enterprise | 313 |
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Head of QA at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use LambdaTest for comprehensive testing needs, including cross-browser and device testing. The HyperExecute feature speeds up execution, though reporting could improve. While testing coverage has increased, I continue to assess its full capabilities alongside considering other solutions like Cypress and BrowserStack. |
| Quality Engineer at Belong | 3.5 | We primarily use LambdaTest for app testing, benefiting from automation to improve test execution times. However, its speed, memory, and ease of installation need improvement, and the limited device connectivity can be an issue for testing native features. |
| Senior Software Engineer at Vvolve management consultants | 4.0 | As a DevOps engineer, I use LambdaTest to automate QA testing. Its support for multiple platforms and cloud integration is valuable, though improvements in service account usage and LDAP integration are needed. Moving from BrowserStack to LambdaTest was cost-effective. |
| Presales at Net Solutions | 4.0 | I oversee LambdaTest's functioning in our company, where it reduces manual effort by automating tasks. As a valuable AWS service, it integrates smoothly with our systems. Our IT team handles it, but timely feature improvements could enhance performance. |
| Software Test Engineer at Qualitest | 4.0 | I use LambdaTest to test a website’s UI across different mobile devices efficiently. Its user-friendly interface allows for easy management of multiple devices. However, the automatic logout due to inactivity can be inconvenient when reviewing requirements and specifications. |
| Automation Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees | 2.5 | I used LambdaTest for mobile testing and found it easy to use with comprehensive documentation. However, I was dissatisfied with the technical support and their communication in resolving issues. No previous or alternative solutions were considered, and no cloud provider was specified. |
| Senior Software Quality Assurance Engineer at Equifax Inc. | 4.0 | I find LambdaTest valuable for automation testing and monitoring across multiple browsers and operating systems. However, performing automation testing from the UI is a bit slow and could use improvement. We haven't considered or used other solutions before. |
| Software Development Engineer in Test/QA at DAXAP | 3.5 | In our project, we use LambdaTest for mobile automation, real-time testing, and real device testing. It's valuable for its mobile and cross-browser testing capabilities, though it could improve its testing speed, especially when switching between devices. |
