LambdaTest vs Qt Squish comparison

LambdaTest and Qt Group are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7, while Qt Group is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. LambdaTest holds a 2.5% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qt Group’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 28 LambdaTest reviews

2,889 Views
1,271 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

3,201 Views
2,593 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 27, 2025

Qt Squish and LambdaTest compete in the software testing category. LambdaTest appears to have the upper hand due to its cloud-based capabilities, platform diversity, and integration flexibility.

Features: Qt Squish integrates seamlessly with Qt frameworks, making it ideal for GUI regression testing within Qt environments. It offers behavior-driven development support and robust test script creation. LambdaTest stands out with its extensive browser and device compatibility, geolocation testing capabilities, and support for automation grids, allowing parallel testing across numerous platforms.

Room for Improvement: Qt Squish could enhance its object identification capabilities and improve the readability of recorded test scripts. The dependency on the Qt framework limits its use with standalone applications. Improving object management and code documentation could also benefit users. LambdaTest needs to develop better native mobile application testing support and better dashboard analytics for improved user experience. Real devices for testing would provide more accurate results over emulators.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qt Squish offers on-premises deployment, granting users control over their setups. Its technical support is fast and efficient. LambdaTest, being cloud-based, provides deployment flexibility across public and private clouds, with similarly excellent customer service and responsive issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Qt Squish is a costlier solution given its licensing models, but the investment is often justified by its specialized capabilities within its niche. LambdaTest is more budget-friendly with flexible pricing plans, starting at relatively low costs, and offers significant ROI, especially for large-scale enterprises by delivering cost-effective cross-device testing solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (6th)

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 2.5%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qt Squish is 2.9%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
LambdaTest	2.5%
Qt Squish	2.9%
Other	94.6%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Karine Kirche

Practice Specialist at a government with 1-10 employees

Cloud-based testing has simplified remote mobile validation and provides flexible device coverage

I was not impressed with how detailed their analytics and logs are from LambdaTest. The solution we were testing is being used because many of us are working from home. It was easy to implement because with a real phone, we have to bring a real phone to each person. Since three years ago, many employees have been working from home, so we were trying to find a solution for this challenge. We had no need to exploit the information for the analytics generated in the background. The purpose was simply to make it easy for our employees to access a phone. The downsides I noticed include that the pricing was very good, but the visual quality of the image sometimes suffers. The contrast on a real iPhone provides better contrast than with the cloud solution. The only aspect that was less favorable than on a real phone was the contrast of the color.

Read full review

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."

"The primary feature that has significantly improved our test execution times is automation."

"Automation and mobile testing have improved our efficiency."

"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."

"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."

"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."

"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."

"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."

More LambdaTest pros

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"I can perform Java SWT."

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"It is very stable."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

Cons

"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."

"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."

"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."

"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."

"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."

"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."

"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."

More LambdaTest cons

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"Support isn't always helpful. I sometimes need to find solutions myself."

"You need to set up some special environment variables."

"The price could be better."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"This is an affordable product."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

"It is expensive."

"The platform is highly-priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 42% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 14% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 5% of the time

QA Wolf vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 14% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 12% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 8% of the time

Appium vs Qt Squish

Compared 7% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

January 2026

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

January 2026

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

No data available

froglogic Squish

Overview

LambdaTest offers real-time and automated testing across extensive browser and OS combinations with integrations like Jenkins and GitLab. It combines legacy and real device access for diverse compatibility, enhancing functionality and execution speed with HyperExecute and Docker tunneling.

Geared for businesses requiring robust browser compatibility, LambdaTest simplifies large-scale testing needs with seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. Its automation features and parallel testing capabilities help detect UI misalignments quickly while reducing manual efforts. LambdaTest supports cross-browser functionality with comprehensive documentation and platform fusions like AWS for enhanced utility.

What key features make LambdaTest indispensable?

Intuitive Interface: Streamlines user experience.
Real-Time Testing: Thousands of browser and OS combinations available.
Tool Integration: Compatible with Jenkins and GitLab.
Automation and Parallel Testing: Efficient test cycles and process streamlining.
Legacy and Real Device Access: Ensures broad compatibility.
HyperExecute: Boosts execution speed significantly.
Docker Tunnel: Enables local testing with ease.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Comprehensive Documentation: Ensures ease of use and knowledge sharing.
Enhanced Performance: Fusions with platforms like AWS offer improved efficiency.
Global User Compatibility: Reduces manual testing, boosts customer experience.
CI/CD Integration: Consistent performance across teams.
Efficient Resource Utilization: Lowered manual testing efforts and cost efficiency.

In industries demanding high browser compatibility and web responsiveness, teams integrate LambdaTest for automation, real-time testing, and maintaining global user experience standards. Its use in parallel testing cycles alongside industry-driven integrations minimizes timelines and optimizes workflows effectively.

LambdaTest

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Qt Group

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish

January 2026

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. Qt Squish report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.