Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Qt Group and Ranorex are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Qt Group is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3, while Ranorex is ranked #15. Qt Group holds a 2.9% mindshare in TAt, compared to Ranorex’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Qt Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

3,201 Views
2,593 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

3,324 Views
2,726 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Ranorex Studio and Qt Squish are competing in the software testing automation category. Ranorex Studio often has the upper hand in pricing and support, whereas Qt Squish is valued for its robust feature set and cross-platform capabilities.

Features: Ranorex Studio's standout features include codeless testing capabilities, ease of use, and integration with various testing frameworks. Qt Squish distinguishes itself with its powerful support for cross-platform testing, a wide range of supported programming languages, and scripting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Ranorex Studio could enhance its platform support, integration options, and flexibility for technical users. Qt Squish might improve its user interface to be more beginner-friendly, enhance script management, and reduce its setup complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ranorex Studio offers a straightforward deployment process, emphasizing quick implementation and extensive customer support. Qt Squish provides deployment flexibility with technical support focused on in-depth problem resolution, catering to diverse customer needs.

Pricing and ROI: Ranorex Studio is considered cost-effective, providing competitive setup costs and a clear return on investment through efficient testing. Qt Squish entails higher initial costs but offers significant long-term ROI due to its advanced features and cross-platform capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (19th), Mobile App Testing Tools (9th), Regression Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qt Squish is 2.9%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 4.2%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Qt Squish	2.9%
Ranorex Studio	4.2%
Other	92.9%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"It is very stable."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"I can perform Java SWT."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"Support isn't always helpful. I sometimes need to find solutions myself."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"You need to set up some special environment variables."

"The price could be better."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

"For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis."

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

"It is expensive."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 14% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 8% of the time

Appium vs Qt Squish

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 7% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 17% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 5% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

January 2026

Download Qt Squish product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

January 2026

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Also Known As

froglogic Squish

No data available

Overview

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Qt Group

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio

January 2026

Free Report: Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.