Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ranorex Studio pros and cons

Vendor: Ranorex

4.0 out of 5

46 reviews
95% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

Ranorex Studio supports continuous integration by integrating with tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity and offers regression testing and code conversion for flexible automation. While it includes useful libraries for quick recording, users report issues with object recognition in .NET applications and compatibility problems after updates. Support for automating SAP could be more straightforward, and response times from technical support need improvement, especially in the US.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Ranorex Studio offers easy integration with CI tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity.

Regression testing and continuous integration are essential features provided by Ranorex Studio.

Ranorex Studio is a powerful, reliable, and versatile all-around application testing suite with impressive scalability.

Support for Ranorex Studio is quick and responsive, often delivering same-day responses.

Ranorex Studio features a capture and replay tool that automates test case steps effectively, enhancing data security by allowing tests on local machines.

CONS

Ranorex struggles with object recognition in .NET desktop applications and its automation of the SAP application could be improved for simplicity.

Integration with other products is required to output results in desired formats, suggesting enhancements for built-in compatibility.

Ranorex experiences issues rendering web pages with numerous queries, as seen with a heavy load of about 1,000 queries.

Updates in Ranorex can cause compatibility issues with existing projects, requiring simultaneous library upgrades.

Technical support responsiveness is lacking, particularly because it is based in Europe, causing delays for users in the United States.

Ranorex Studio Pros review quotes

TS

Thangavel Sundaram

Test Manager/ QA Consultant at Aspire Systems

Aug 25, 2017

Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity.

Read full review

Systems Architect with 51-200 employees

May 23, 2018

The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process.

Read full review

Test Expert/Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

Jul 4, 2021

This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite.

Read full review

Free Report: Ranorex Studio Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Ranorex Studio. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FP

Quality Control Analyst at SIA

Aug 19, 2019

The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market.

Read full review

Automation Tester at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Aug 19, 2019

Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features.

Read full review

reviewer1363938

Communications Infrastructure, QA Leader at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jul 5, 2020

Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations.

Read full review

reviewer1661484

Director Of Quality Assurance at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Oct 27, 2021

I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective.

Read full review

MR

Quality Assurance Analyst at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 10, 2021

The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance.

Read full review

reviewer1120770

Associate Manager at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Feb 4, 2022

Object identification is good.

Read full review

Software Engineer at BAE Systems

Feb 10, 2022

I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy.

Read full review

Show 5 more reviews (out of 15)

Ranorex Studio Cons review quotes

TS

Thangavel Sundaram

Test Manager/ QA Consultant at Aspire Systems

Aug 25, 2017

Other OS Support, Ranorex Spy performance improvement (Especially for Silverlight controls).

Read full review

Systems Architect with 51-200 employees

May 23, 2018

Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work.

Read full review

Test Expert/Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

Jul 4, 2021

For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it.

Read full review

Free Report: Ranorex Studio Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Ranorex Studio. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FP

Quality Control Analyst at SIA

Aug 19, 2019

One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian.

Read full review

Automation Tester at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Aug 19, 2019

If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it.

Read full review

reviewer1363938

Communications Infrastructure, QA Leader at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jul 5, 2020

The object detection functionality needs to be improved.

Read full review

reviewer1661484

Director Of Quality Assurance at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Oct 27, 2021

Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful.

Read full review

MR

Quality Assurance Analyst at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 10, 2021

I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis.

Read full review

reviewer1120770

Associate Manager at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Feb 4, 2022

The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler.

Read full review

Software Engineer at BAE Systems

Feb 10, 2022

I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code.

Read full review

Show 5 more reviews (out of 15)

Related questions

19

SAP GUI Testing Tool

11

Test automation tools for SAP ERP automation? Anything comparable to Ranorex?

37

Which solution do you prefer: Uipath or Ranorex?

17

Cross-Platform Automated Testing Tool

62

Anyone have a good example of a Test Automation Business Case?

17

When evaluating Functional Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

22

What is the best automation tool to test dynamic data?

26

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

16

Tosca Testsuite Version 10.0

46

What is the best tool for SAP testing?